Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Secret Animal Rights Agenda Of America’s Next Regulatory Czar [No more fishin' and huntin']
Consumer Freedom ^ | Jan 15, 2009

Posted on 01/16/2009 9:45:12 AM PST by upchuck

Barack Obama’s pick for “regulatory czar,” Harvard Law School Professor Cass Sunstein, may be the incoming president’s most popular appointment so far. Judging from his resume -- best-selling author, “pre-eminent legal scholar of our time,” and an endorsement from The Wall Street Journal -- we can almost understand why. Almost. Because as we’re telling the media today, there’s one troubling portion of the new Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) Administrator’s C.V. that has seems to have flown under everyone’s radar: Cass Sunstein is a radical animal rights activist.

Don’t believe us? Sunstein has made no secret of his devotion to the cause of establishing legal “rights” for livestock, wildlife, and pets. “[T]here should be extensive regulation of the use of animals in entertainment, scientific experiments, and agriculture,” Sunstein wrote in a 2002 working paper while at the University of Chicago Law school.

“Extensive regulation of the use of animals.” That's PETA-speak for using government to get everything PETA and the Humane Society of the United States can't get through gentle pressure or not-so-gentle coercion. Not exactly the kind of thing American ranchers, restaurateurs, hunters, and biomedical researchers (to say nothing of ordinary consumers) would like to hear from their next “regulatory czar.”

A version of the same paper also appeared as the introduction to Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions, a 2004 book that Sunstein co-edited with then-girlfriend Martha Nussbaum. In that book, Sunstein set out an ambitious plan to give animals the legal “right” to file lawsuits. We're not joking:

“[A]nimals should be permitted to bring suit, with human beings as their representatives, to prevent violations of current law … Any animals that are entitled to bring suit would be represented by (human) counsel, who would owe guardian like obligations and make decisions, subject to those obligations, on their clients’ behalf.”

It doesn't end there. Sunstein delivered a keynote speech at Harvard University’s 2007 “Facing Animals” conference. (Click here to watch the video; his speech starts around 39:00.) Keep in mind that as OIRA Administrator, Sunstein will have the political authority to implement a massive federal government overhaul. Consider this tidbit:

“We ought to ban hunting, I suggest, if there isn’t a purpose other than sport and fun. That should be against the law. It’s time now.”

Sunstein also argued in favor of “eliminating current practices such as greyhound racing, cosmetic testing, and meat eating, most controversially.”

He concluded his Harvard speech by expressing his “more ambitious animating concern” that the current treatment of livestock and other animals should be considered “a form of unconscionable barbarity not the same as, but in many ways morally akin to, slavery and mass extermination of human beings.” Sound familiar?

As the individual about to assume “the most important position that Americans know nothing about,” Sunstein owes the public an honest appraisal of his animal rights goals before taking office. Will the next four years be a dream-come-true for anti-meat, anti-hunting, and anti-everything-else radicals? Time will tell. For now, meat lovers might want to stock their freezers.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; 2002; 2007; animalwhackos; animarights; bho2008; bhobanglist; bhocabinet; bhoenvironment; bhointerior; bhooira; chicagocell; environment; facinganimals; fishing; greyhoundracing; greyhounds; harvard; hunting; meat; oira; samanthapower; sunstein; vegetarianism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: upchuck

Hey! I’m a huge conservationist, but I have to say that I’d rather enjoy my life if they outlaw hunting and fishing. I’ll merely hunt and fish as a darn well please, without regard to seasons or limits and take what I want and need when I fell like it. Finally, I will never have to wear that stupid orange vest again while I’m bowhunting on my own land.

Please, make my day.


21 posted on 01/16/2009 10:04:20 AM PST by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Sunstein set out an ambitious plan to give animals the legal “right” to file lawsuits

Oh yeah - that's something our cats really need...

Girl Cat: You petted Boy Cat first - I'm suing!

Boy Cat: You gave Girl Cat an extra treat - I'm suing!

Girl Cat: You won't let me sleep on your pillow - I'm suing!

Boy Cat: Why can't I have my own McDonalds cheeseburger? I'm suing!

22 posted on 01/16/2009 10:07:34 AM PST by meowmeow (In Loving Memory of Our Dear Viking Kitty (1987-2006))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meowmeow

I honestly believe that these people are mentally ill.

The sad part is that they now run the asylum.

TM


23 posted on 01/16/2009 10:11:01 AM PST by poindexters brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: poindexters brother
I honestly believe that these people are mentally ill.

I totally believe that too - with a spiritual twist...

Romans 1:28 Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done.

24 posted on 01/16/2009 10:17:26 AM PST by meowmeow (In Loving Memory of Our Dear Viking Kitty (1987-2006))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

When Bubba can’t hunt deer, he’ll hunt czars. I guaran-damn-tee it.


25 posted on 01/16/2009 11:41:24 AM PST by TexasRepublic (Silly muslim persons! I fling my pigskin shoes in your general direction!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
… Any animals that are entitled to bring suit would be represented by (human) counsel, who would owe guardian like obligations and make decisions, subject to those obligations, on their clients’ behalf.”

When will unborn humans have these protections?

26 posted on 01/16/2009 11:42:00 AM PST by TigersEye (One shot revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omega4412

Bump!


27 posted on 01/16/2009 11:58:09 AM PST by upchuck (Get ready for 2009: Pray; Raise/conserve cash; Pay your debts; Pray; Stockpile; Buy ammo; Pray)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
I thought the twerp was older.

He wrote a screed just after the impeachment wars called "Republic.com".

Sunstein's 2001 book, Republic.com, argued that the Internet may weaken democracy because it allows citizens to isolate themselves within groups that share their own views and experiences, and thus cut themselves off from any information that might challenge their beliefs, a phenomenon known as cyberbalkanization.

Many think that he was using Free Republic as a touchstone or model for his ideas in the book.

Of course, Sunstein is a fool, for Free Republic serves as a place to isolate us from the gibbering semi-literacies of the drooling Lefty "publik skool gradjewites"...

28 posted on 01/16/2009 1:43:46 PM PST by an amused spectator (Citizen Kenyan: The man who created The Sock-Puppet Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson