Typical Democrat approach -- rhetoric and planning stupid and dangerous actions, without understanding the full implications of those actions.
What is Holder and Obama going to say WHEN ( NOT "if") we will have an attack on the US that could have been prevented if we interrogated captured terrorists?
To: FocusNexus
Waterboarding=torture
Another spaced out loser.... welcome to 0bammyLand
2 posted on
01/15/2009 1:32:06 PM PST by
dennisw
(On the thirty first floor a gold plated door won't keep out the Lord's burning rage ---FBB)
To: FocusNexus
Blame Bush for the attack.
3 posted on
01/15/2009 1:32:28 PM PST by
Joiseydude
(Let the Hero, born of woman, crush the serpent with his heel,)
To: FocusNexus
Business for his trial lawyer buddies at taxpayer expense. Another scam in a long line coming.
4 posted on
01/15/2009 1:32:41 PM PST by
Neoliberalnot
((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
To: FocusNexus
What is Holder and Obama going to say WHEN ( NOT "if") we will have an attack on the US that could have been prevented if we interrogated captured terrorists?
You will never hear about it because they will shut down talk radio
5 posted on
01/15/2009 1:33:23 PM PST by
dennisw
(On the thirty first floor a gold plated door won't keep out the Lord's burning rage ---FBB)
To: FocusNexus
“Holder said torture does not lead to reliable intelligence”
And some US court decisions don't lead to reliable verdicts.
That's why we don't want them tried here.
6 posted on
01/15/2009 1:33:51 PM PST by
wolfcreek
(I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
To: FocusNexus
As a practical matter, Holder said torture does not lead to reliable intelligence.
Bullshit. Why do commies always say this?
We always verify the information we get because torture or no torture we are dealing with scum of the earth
9 posted on
01/15/2009 1:35:40 PM PST by
dennisw
(On the thirty first floor a gold plated door won't keep out the Lord's burning rage ---FBB)
To: FocusNexus
I wonder if he believes burning children alive to their death is torture? (Waco)
To: FocusNexus
Great just what we need. Terrorists in front of the same type of jury pool that set OJ free the first time around.
Future note to the military...there aren’t any survivors to capture.
13 posted on
01/15/2009 1:37:32 PM PST by
Domandred
(Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.)
To: FocusNexus
Oops.....didn’t read them their Miranda rights.
All are released.
15 posted on
01/15/2009 1:39:21 PM PST by
ElectricStrawberry
(1/27th Infantry Wolfhounds...cut in half during the Clinton years.)
To: FocusNexus
0be and Holder (Pardoner) are retards wrt the US Constitution.
22 posted on
01/15/2009 1:51:21 PM PST by
Paladin2
(No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
To: FocusNexus
The terrorists will get taxpayer trials where lawyer cronies defending terrorists will make $5 million per trial.
23 posted on
01/15/2009 1:51:38 PM PST by
Frantzie
To: FocusNexus
Just wait to see what he'll do to legal gunowners...Thank you Orrin Hatch and the rest of the repubricrats for backing this marxist son of a bitch.
FMCDH(BITS)
26 posted on
01/15/2009 2:11:12 PM PST by
nothingnew
(I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
To: FocusNexus
As a practical matter, Holder said torture does not lead to reliable intelligence. And on principle, he said the United States needs to live up to its own high standards, even in the face of fear and terrorism. I wonder how the people that are on the front lines of the WOT feel about this?
The enemy has no rules and the administration has no clue.
28 posted on
01/15/2009 2:15:30 PM PST by
oldbrowser
(Break up the federal government.)
To: FocusNexus
This is how utterly stupid and insane democrats have to be.
We’ve had counterterrorism measures that have worked for over 7 years now, and this bamboozling idiot wants to change what’s working!?
29 posted on
01/15/2009 2:33:57 PM PST by
sirchtruth
(Gravity Of The Situation...)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; justiceseeker93; ..
TARP Inspector General Asked to Investigate
Citigroup and Bank of America Donations to Rainbow/PUSH
National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) | January 15, 2009 | Peter Flaherty
Posted on 01/15/2009 12:36:44 PM PST by Ooh-Ah
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2165259/posts
30 posted on
01/15/2009 2:35:31 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: FocusNexus
What is Holder and Obama going to say WHEN ( NOT "if") we will have an attack on the US that could have been prevented if we interrogated captured terrorists?Leave D.C. very quickly when the American people rise up and take their country back.
31 posted on
01/15/2009 2:40:30 PM PST by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: FocusNexus
In a Fantasy League for Attorney Generals, do you anticipate that Holder would be drafted before or after the memorable Janet Reno?....Even without remembering who Carter’s AG was, and even before Holder begins, they’d go last, for me. I’d even pick John Mitchell ahead of those two.
To: FocusNexus
To: FocusNexus
Typical Democrat approach -- rhetoric and planning stupid and dangerous actions, without understanding the full implications of those actions. What is Holder and Obama going to say WHEN ( NOT "if") we will have an attack on the US that could have been prevented if we interrogated captured terrorists?
"It's Bush's fault!" What else?
Frankly, the glaring absence of any hard questioning of Eric Holder by Republican committee members is as nauseating as it is predictable. They've all gone left and have become useless. The current GOP as represented in congress is pathetic and absolutely spineless. I can't watch them, anymore. Praising leftists and shying away from ruffling the feathers of Obama nominees, even when these people are unqualified. This is now 'business as usual' for Republicans in congress, with a very few exceptions.
This country is screwed. The voters went for the media-driven celebrity candidate - and got him. If I have to hear how the inauguration of Barack Hussein Obama is 'historical' one more time, I'll puke on my TV set. Yeah, he's Black but how many of the people who blindly voted for Obama (not counting the fraudulent votes) really knew what he stood for besides some amorphous 'change'?
Now, we'll all reap the whirlwind of borderline-insane leftist policies that will endanger every American and incompetent political hacks playing 'leader' while they suck their thumbs if this nation is attacked as it was on September 11th, 2001.
I don't even want to think of what the leftists in his administration will do to the U.S. economy with their anti-business policies that usually end up punishing the poor and the middle class they always pretend to care so much about during their campaigns.
Well, American wanted 'change' - and we're going to get it. I'm no fan of Mencken but he did have a point when he wrote: "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard. Here it comes, folks....good and hard.
34 posted on
01/15/2009 2:51:55 PM PST by
Jim Scott
(Never, never, never give up! - Winston Churchill)
To: FocusNexus
There is no Republican party left. They are all RINO’s. Hatch is nothing but a Dem butt kisser. Holder is the Constitutions worst nightmare and the terrorists dream come true.
35 posted on
01/15/2009 3:21:52 PM PST by
mojitojoe
(Not my president.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson