Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strategic Collapse at the Army War College
Pajama Media ^ | January 14, 2009 | Patrick Poole

Posted on 01/14/2009 8:22:52 AM PST by PurpleMan

This intellectual and strategic groundwork for the “long war” against Islamic terrorism will never be accomplished as long as our senior service schools and military academies continue to neglect this vital area of strategic study. Regardless of what one might think about the relation between Islamic theology and jihadist justifications for terror, it is a fact that they believe they are operating in accordance with Islamic tradition. Islamic war doctrine ought to be studied on that basis alone.

(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armywarcollege; holywar; islam; jihad; military; muslim; religion; religiouswar; rop; trop; usarmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 01/14/2009 8:22:53 AM PST by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

bump for read later. Thanks for posting.


2 posted on 01/14/2009 8:26:03 AM PST by EverOnward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EverOnward

bflr


3 posted on 01/14/2009 8:31:42 AM PST by RaceBannon (We have sown the wind, but we will reap the whirlwind. NObama. Not my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan
This is a discouraging piece but truthful.

There is only one, inescapable conclusion: America cannot defeat the Islamic enemy because we no longer agree upon who WE are as a nation.

When you have advisers within our own Defense Department taking a sympathetic view of vicious, murdering Islamic nutballs, how can you have hope for our side?

4 posted on 01/14/2009 8:32:04 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
“...we no longer agree upon who WE are as a nation.”

We do not have the political or national will to protect our own sovereignty.

It reminds me of the descriptions of the fall of Rome. There were so many ihabitants of Rome who were NOT Romans... who had no stake in the success of Rome as a national entity, who only and always cared for their personal, immediate and temporary well-being... I seem to recall this distinctly

5 posted on 01/14/2009 8:41:47 AM PST by SMARTY ("Stay together, pay the soldiers and forget everything else" Lucius Septimus Severus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

Some Freepers may recall the scandal of Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon England, who seemed to be in love with Hesham Islam, a Muslim agent who was working in the Pentagon.

It took months to dig through the evidence and demonstrate that this Muslim had told serial lies about his life. He had a top security clearance, was educating everyone in the military about how NICE Muslims are, and evidently no one ever bothered to check out his life story until FR and various conservative blogs raised a fuss.

Gordon England is still in place, although Hesham Islam was given the boot. England should have been kicked into the gutter for that business.

For instance, see this:

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=16101


6 posted on 01/14/2009 8:45:15 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

Leadership needed. Not elected officials.


7 posted on 01/14/2009 8:45:43 AM PST by alarm rider ("Father, let me dedicate all this year to thee". Lawrence Tuttiett (1825-1897))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority

I think the issue is a nation fighting a religion. It is sort of like fighting the Viet Cong. There is no country to attack, only an ideology.

An ideology with several hundred million people, world wide who at the drop of a hat can cause a global war.

You cannot take it on alone. You need global support and who will support us?


8 posted on 01/14/2009 8:48:48 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz ("Control the information, you control the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

Here is an enemy telling us exactly what they are going to do and why but we choose to not act on the info. Brilliant!


9 posted on 01/14/2009 8:49:34 AM PST by Right Wing Assault (What's Obama's Secret?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

More links to Hesham Islam, Steve Caughlin,

Islamic Law Expert Fired for Being a ‘Christian Zealot’?:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,322450,00.html

Who is Hesham Islam?:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/1564

Parsing the truth at the Pentagon:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/1600

Should government employ terrorist sympathizers?:
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/gaffney022008.php3


10 posted on 01/14/2009 8:51:42 AM PST by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
I used to think increasing world trade would help the world move away from barbarism and tyranny.

The result has actually been the opposite.

We actively buy from China, a brutal and murderous dictatorship which only serves its tyrants to maintain their boots on the necks of the Chinese people. Wal-Mart is the great facilitator of Chinese tyranny and we American consumers are accomplices.

Right now we see American demand for Chinese goods has fallen dramatically and the Chinese people are more ready to rise against the tyrants who oppress them than they were when Americans were buying everything the Chinese could make for us.

We also buy too much oil from Saudi Arabia, a country which outlaws the practice of Christianity and exports Islamic terrorism.

We should not trade with ANY country that does not respect the rights of its own people or other cultures.

We should be fighting Saudi Arabia and China, NOT FILLING THEIR COFFERS WITH OUR MONEY!

Increased world trade has caused more tyranny and brutality than ever.

11 posted on 01/14/2009 9:08:41 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

I posted this report he’s talking about last week. It was disturbing to me, but no one else seemed to pick up on it.

HAMAS and Israel: Conflicting Strategies of Group-Based Politics
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2159410/posts


12 posted on 01/14/2009 9:53:46 AM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz; All

“There is no country to attack, only ideology.” And terror cell groups.

I have just finished reading a book on Special Ops warfare. An important point made was that the big military is not very comfortable with elite troops, and is structured to marginalize their input and power. Also the CIA does not require the kind of rigorous training and retraining that Special Ops warriors go through regularly. The book gives many good examples of the importance of irregular warfare throughout history, with 100 pages devoted to the period 1945 to 2010, and lessons to be learned and implemented.

“To Dare & To Conquer: Special Operations and the Destiny of Nations, from Achilles to Al Qaeda,” (2006) by Derek Leebaert.

The important point is that we need more highly trained irregular warriors to combat hidden terror cells and the like.


13 posted on 01/14/2009 10:16:15 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan
At issue is the study, or lack of study of asymmetric warfare:

Conflict between inferior and superior forces driven by ideology and supported by partisan and/or irregular forces.

The US Marine Corps Warfighting Lab, established in 1995, at Quantico, VA specializes in asymmetric and unconventional warfare. There are no tactical or logistical boundaries at the lab.

One chronic problem with other "war colleges" is the drive and perceived need to assume importance to people who fight, the Hitlers, Stalins, bin Ladens, etc. That makes for very nice "White Papers" that bring the authors attention/promotions/speaking engagements.

The problem is that jihadism organizes around tasks, making authentic study very difficult.

This is the fundamental problem in our "war colleges", the time pressure to produce reports. Many attend for a few short years and think they can google their way to success.

14 posted on 01/14/2009 10:16:58 AM PST by gandalftb (An appeaser feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault
Here is an enemy telling us exactly what they are going to do and why but we choose to not act on the info. Brilliant!

Well, actually, I think a lot of what they tell us, is in hopes that we will choose to act on the info.

The question isn't always how to act, it can sometimes be when to act. And in some cases, the question is whether to act at all.

15 posted on 01/14/2009 10:19:23 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

Lawyer activism in the US is all over the place. It’s a huge loophole for terrorists and communists.

We are supposed to stand in the way of suicide bombing activists, but it seems that it’s not going to be done either.

Oh well, I guess we’ll have to wait to see Congress turn into Saudi Arabia or Kenyan Embassies. We have embraced their policies.


16 posted on 01/14/2009 10:27:39 AM PST by JudgemAll (control freaks, their world & their problem with my gun and my protecting my private party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

Marker


17 posted on 01/14/2009 10:35:14 AM PST by JDoutrider (Heading to Galt's Gulch... It is time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
We should not trade with ANY country that does not respect the rights of its own people or other cultures.

We should be fighting Saudi Arabia and China, NOT FILLING THEIR COFFERS WITH OUR MONEY!

Increased world trade has caused more tyranny and brutality than ever.

For the last 30 years, I could not believe we were trading with our enemies. I thought the "constructive engagement" model must have been invented by people much smarter than I, because I had never seen wealth turn a despicable person into a good one. In fact, it is usually quite the opposite.

I hate being right.

18 posted on 01/14/2009 10:53:08 AM PST by Starfleet Command
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
My two adopted sons left the Army after years in SpecOps becasue of the very reasons you cite. They were both fed up with being marginalized by the Big Army and misused by area commanders. Both had extensive time in Iraq and Afghanistan. They saw many of their friends killed or wounded in ill advised missions with poor planing and poor logistics.
19 posted on 01/14/2009 10:59:41 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Government only does one thing well - WASTE MONEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$; All

My son is headed back to Afghanistan later this year. He is also SF and pretty cynical about it all. If you are interested I posted several Vanities based on our email while he was there in 2006. Just check my personal page for the title. He also served during Gulf War I, from Aug. 9, 1990 to April, 1991, with the 82nd Airborne Sheridan tanks.


20 posted on 01/14/2009 1:43:43 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson