Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama should press forward with missile defense
The Kansas City Star ^ | Sat, Jan. 10, 2009 | E. THOMAS MCCLANAHAN

Posted on 01/11/2009 11:00:01 AM PST by lizol

Obama should press forward with missile defense

By E. THOMAS MCCLANAHAN The Kansas City Star

Barack Obama’s first test came pretty quickly. But we still don’t know how he will respond.

The day after the election, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev reiterated Moscow’s threat to place short-range missiles near Poland if the U.S. builds a missile-defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic.

NATO has endorsed missile defense for Europe. The U.S. and Poland have agreed that missile interceptors will be placed on Polish soil. The question is whether Obama will back away from that in the face of Russian threats.

The answer, so far, is unclear.

Soon after his election, Obama spoke to Russian President Lech Kaczynski, who said he was told the “missile defense project would continue.” But Obama’s transition team issued a statement saying the president-elect had made no such commitment.

The confusion highlights Obama’s tendency to straddle the missile-defense issue.

In a debate with Sen. John McCain, he said, “I actually believe that we need missile defense, because of Iran and North Korea and the potential for them to obtain or to launch nuclear weapons.” But he also has pledged to “cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.”

As his transition team put it, Obama supports a missile defense system “when the technology is proved to be workable.”

This is the favored language of missile-defense skeptics or outright opponents. Of course it has to be workable. Who’s in favor of an unworkable system?

The problem is, missile defense is a system of systems, and the way to test it is to develop it. It has to be built before it can be tested. The same thing applied to the Global Positioning System.

(Excerpt) Read more at kansascity.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agenda; antimissiledefense; bhoforeignpolicy; bhonationalsecurity; missiledefense; obama; poland; russia

1 posted on 01/11/2009 11:00:02 AM PST by lizol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lizol

For some strange reason, liberals are for missile defense. Suddenly. I’m sure it has nothing to do with politics....


2 posted on 01/11/2009 11:08:15 AM PST by ScreamingFist (Annihilation - The result of underestimating your enemies. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

http://www.alternet.org/story/107666/


3 posted on 01/11/2009 11:14:45 AM PST by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6UZaGan0CI


4 posted on 01/11/2009 11:30:10 AM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Obama will take it down, or will negoiatate some sort of agreement which allows Moscow and Beijing to see the technology as an agreement for setting up the system.


5 posted on 01/11/2009 5:03:22 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson