Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama selects Leon Panetta? Why not Oprah?
The Collins Report ^ | Jan. 6, 2009 | Kevin "Coach" Collins

Posted on 01/06/2009 5:42:56 AM PST by jmaroneps37

If anyone needed more proof that Democrats are children who truly don’t understand how the world works, the selection of lifelong party hack Leon Panetta as the new Director of the Central Intelligence Agency should blow away all doubt.

Barack Obama indicated he picked Panetta because he is thought of as a good manager who understands government bureaucracy. The unspoken “attributes” Panetta brings are his naïve objections to the methods of modern spying and counter intelligence operations.

His pronouncement that America “must not use torture under any circumstances” elevates his selection from stupid to dangerous.

To a Democrat lawyer who was a 1st Lieutenant in the Army, understanding why terrorists cannot be treated like bank robbers is indeed a daunting task.

But someone whose naivety matched his own was the quality Obama wanted as he builds his Administration. The importance of the job means nothing.

Obama apparently thinks that Panetta’s total lack of experience or qualifications makes him the perfect man to protect us in these dangerous times. That this makes no sense means nothing.

Obama could have tapped Oprah Winfrey as the new CIA Director and done better given his rationale. Oprah hates torture and can manage people.

Oprah has managed more money than Panetta has ever administered. She probably has personally met and spent time with many of the world’s leaders.

Notwithstanding the questionable virility of most Democrat politicians, Oprah would have no trouble out crying Panetta at press conferences as she condemned water boarding.

Certainly Oprah is against torture and would be more able to sway public opinion against water boarding and such nasty practices as the dreaded underwear on the head torture.

Oprah could personally fund the new “Humanitarian Desk” at The Company. That would save money for Obama. Panetta couldn’t do that.

Oprah would have...

(Excerpt) Read more at Collinsreport.net ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cia; joke; obamaregime; obamatransitionfile; panetta; punetta
If this wasn't so serious it would be laugh out loud funny. But it is serious. Obama apparently has no concept of the danger we are in.
1 posted on 01/06/2009 5:42:56 AM PST by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Biden foresaw this when he said Barry would be tested. Picks like Panetta open the front door to terrorists and put out the welcome mat.


2 posted on 01/06/2009 5:45:44 AM PST by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

The choice of a bureaucrat like Panetta to head CIA - during wartime no less- shows that Bambi
Doesn’t respect (or understand) the CIA or US Intelligence Community (aka “pigs” to his mentors like Ayers)
Doesn’t believe (and understand) we are at war
Expects to get his “intelligence” on real threats (to his power) from other sources

Oprah wouldn’t any any worse...perhaps she could start an “NIE of the Month” club


3 posted on 01/06/2009 5:47:43 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Oprah wasn’t selected because she’s gained too much weight, and she blames Michelle Obama for it.


4 posted on 01/06/2009 5:51:13 AM PST by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Why not Oprah? Because she couldn’t afford the paycut not to mention the fact that she has a life beyond Washington DC? Or, maybe because Obama feels that Paneta is capable of doing more damage to our intelligence gathering capabilities than Oprah? Just thinking out loud here.


5 posted on 01/06/2009 5:52:33 AM PST by Reaganesque (BCS - The "C" is silent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Isn’t Oprah being touted as our new National Nanny?


6 posted on 01/06/2009 5:57:52 AM PST by OpusatFR (Neither Republican or Democrat. Monarchist with allegience to The Only One.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

For a Democrat, everything is politics. The only real threats Mr. Obama sees in the world are his political opponents. Hence his support for the Fairness Doctrine. Foreigners with bombs and guns are not a direct threat to his and his party’s political power thus, they barely show up on his radar screen.


7 posted on 01/06/2009 5:58:39 AM PST by Reaganesque (BCS - The "C" is silent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Bingo. Panetta’s mission isn’t to protect the country, it is to protect the Messiah.


8 posted on 01/06/2009 6:01:17 AM PST by IGOTMINE (1911s FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

exactly- priorities are showing here

they see Republicans, “conservatives” and uppity democrats as a bigger threat to “America” than terrorism, China or Russia

full internal controls will be established soon after January 21. A doctrinally clueless and long time loyal party bureacrat at CIA may be a useful tool


9 posted on 01/06/2009 6:05:22 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
0bama managed to tick off 2 powerful Senators (Feinstein and Rockefeller) of his own party with this incredible choice (choosing an intelligence virgin to head the CIA!). What happened to all of the charm and "healing" ability O was supposed to have? The Internet terms "epic fail" (AKA a massive fudge-up) and "lulz" (schadenfreude; laughing at someone else's misfortune) may well apply here.
10 posted on 01/06/2009 6:09:42 AM PST by seatrout (I wouldn't know most "American Idol" winners if I tripped over them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

I’m surprised that Slyvester Stallone wasn’t picked to be SecDef. Good thing he wasn’t. Can you imagine the confusion resulting from a “Rahmbo” and a Rambo in 44’s Administration?


11 posted on 01/06/2009 6:14:24 AM PST by Night Hides Not (Don't blame me...I voted for Palin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

bttt


12 posted on 01/06/2009 6:18:24 AM PST by timestax ( CNNLIES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Hey, 60 plus percent of the idiots out there wanted CHANGE. How’s that for CHANGE? I HOPE they like it.


13 posted on 01/06/2009 6:44:16 AM PST by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
Leon Panetta will step aside for Sandy Burglar.
"Musical chairs from the Clinton Administration that we can believe in."
14 posted on 01/06/2009 6:54:38 AM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Puñetta?


15 posted on 01/06/2009 7:04:31 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Because Leon had government experience.

Oprah will be picked for DIRNSA.


16 posted on 01/06/2009 7:43:55 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (All hail the Obamasiah! Kneel before Obamohammad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax

bttt


17 posted on 01/06/2009 9:36:26 AM PST by timestax ( CNNLIES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IGOTMINE

More likely, this is another Hillary-approved appointment so she can keep tabs on Obama.

For the first time in US History, we have a shadow government.


18 posted on 01/06/2009 9:38:44 AM PST by Palladin (When will Bill Ayers start bombing buildings again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

19 posted on 01/06/2009 10:10:12 AM PST by ajay_kumar (Wake me up when the NON-Natural Citizen is out of office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Our enemies must be laughing their fool heads off.


20 posted on 01/06/2009 10:20:25 AM PST by IM2MAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson