Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Case Against Michael Steele (for RNC Chair)
Red State ^ | January 4, 2009 | Robert Bluey

Posted on 01/04/2009 5:49:59 PM PST by St. Louis Conservative

Among the candidates for Republican National Committee chairman, there’s no question Michael Steele is among the most recognizable — a political celebrity thanks to his work for Fox News and run for U.S. Senate in 2006.

Aside from his political celebrity — and knack for being a good talking head — there’s little else about the man that would make him a good chairman. While much has been written about his candidacy and the reasons conservatives should be skeptical, time is running out to convince the 168 members of the RNC they should steer clear of him. Here’s why:

Steele boasts that his chairmanship of GOPAC qualifies him to run the RNC. He cites GOPAC’s work to elect Republicans as good preparation. So how did GOPAC fare under Steele’s leadership? During the 2008 cycle, GOPAC gave 11 candidates seeking U.S. House seats nearly $20,000. Six won and five lost.

Among GOPAC’s expenditures in 2008 was $5,000 to Steele for Maryland, even though Steele wasn’t on the ballot. The money probably went to pay off Steele’s 2006 campaign debt. It also happened to be the third largest expenditure for GOPAC, raising questions about the organization’s priorities under his leadership.

Money has been a problem for Steele in the past. Jennifer Skalka of National Journal’s Hotline reported that when Steele’s consulting business struggled financially, two banks threatened to place liens on his house. Although Steele cleared his debts, these financial issues are factors that must be considered for anyone seeking the RNC chairmanship.

(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: gopac; michaelsteele; rino; rnc; rncchairman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 01/04/2009 5:49:59 PM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Just put Juan Williams in charge. Pull the plug; the GOP as we know it is gone.


2 posted on 01/04/2009 5:54:23 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin ('Taking the moderate path of appeasement leads to abysmal defeat.' - Rush on 11/05/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I pulled the plug and put away my wallet a long time ago. State level is on life support, local level is (mostly) alive and well.


3 posted on 01/04/2009 5:57:39 PM PST by sionnsar (Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

I was amenable to Steele until I heard him doing a radio show. He loves RINOs, wants a big tent party. Screw ‘im.


4 posted on 01/04/2009 5:58:40 PM PST by Sloth (I am the governed, and I hereby withhold my consent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

I live in Maryland so naturally like Steel but this is good information.


5 posted on 01/04/2009 5:59:19 PM PST by sickoflibs (GWB : "Give me a 700B blank check to save the UAW until Obama takes office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

Steele also favors affirmative action and is against repealing Roe vs Wade.


6 posted on 01/04/2009 6:01:19 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

True. The Bush/McCain/Bill Kristol/Michael Gerson/David Frum GOP is gone, and good riddence. We are rebuilding and we can come back stronger, but we need to make good decisions regarding our leadership.


7 posted on 01/04/2009 6:06:46 PM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

I have always liked Steele; but when I heard he is for affirmative action and some other things. I said nope.


8 posted on 01/04/2009 6:06:47 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Thanks St. Louis Conservative: good info about Michael Steele but I would reserve judgment until I verified these critiques. I heard Ken Blackwell on Rush or some other talk show..and he sounded very intelligent and seems to recognize the need for the GOP to come back to its Conservative roots. I hope he wins.


9 posted on 01/04/2009 6:07:03 PM PST by Mountain Mary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

I heard him, probably talking with Hannity, and when he started talking about bringing new people into the party I began to write him off. And he might have used the disqualifying phrase (for me): “reach out”.

Until the party stops thinking it must pander to specific groups, and begins appealing to everyone with the same principles and ideas, I think it’ll remain the distant minority party created for us by the Bushes, Rove, McCain and their RINO running buddies.


10 posted on 01/04/2009 6:16:16 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

he’s got very little to say, heard him on a Local DC show with his former boss, Bob Ehrlich and Ehrlich had a much better grasp of strategy and conditions than Steele, was not impressed at all.


11 posted on 01/04/2009 6:16:37 PM PST by lmc12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Ok, I’ll go ahead and type this .... many think Steele is the answer to Obama because he is black. We need true Conservative leadership. Let’s stop and take a look at why the GOP lost and understand that more RINOS or moderates is not the answer. We “NEED” Conservatives.


12 posted on 01/04/2009 6:28:55 PM PST by Paige ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing," Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
Steele seems rather wimpy on the Second Amendment as well. The little I have heard indicates a “golfers with guns” attitude. Essentially, regulation is ok as long as they don't go after “hunting” guns.
13 posted on 01/04/2009 6:39:08 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paige

You are right, but how do we get them? It is not as if they are out there and we can exchange a RINO for a conservative. If we reject all the RINO’s and don’t somehow bring in people that are conservitive....from wherever you think you may find them, then we are going to become a neat, tidy LITTLE group.

The Democrats do as well as they do because they include ANYONE in the party. They are getting stronger and stronger, bringing in more and more people, while we knit pick our members and spew out those that don’t fit in our cookie cutter. A dangerous road this.


14 posted on 01/04/2009 6:42:18 PM PST by Hanna548 (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

ping


15 posted on 01/04/2009 6:48:36 PM PST by StatenIsland (The '08 Election: It's about the survival of our country, not making a point...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paige
"Ok, I’ll go ahead and type this .... many think Steele is the answer to Obama because he is black."

Yeah, and if we just want to pick a black guy, Ken Blackwell is probably a better choice anyhow. :-P I liked the idea of Steele as RNC chair initially - I think he ran a good campaign in MD, loved the "puppies" ad - but the more I hear the more disenchanted I become. I think we can do better.

16 posted on 01/04/2009 7:12:55 PM PST by Dan Middleton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
I don't know why the GOP just doesn't turn to Ron Paul. Paul united the GOP base. He brought in the libertarians & constitutionalists, and he brought in young adults too. He also brought in folks who never gave a rat's ass about politics before too. All the Republican Party has to do is study a tape of one of Paul's rallies. Why did Paul get over $20 million dollars in the 4th Quarter of 2007? You'd think the GOP would get a clue but it won't. They're going to continue on the same destructive path that has caused them to lose credibility and 2 consecutive elections.

At this point, it really doesn't matter who the GOP pick. Steele is an awful choice, he's someone the GOP will pick just to say they're not mean-old racists. The problem with the party is that it is not dreaming anymore, there are no new ideas, no visionaries, no contrast with the Democrats. The GOP is more interested in accepting and lessening the growth of socialism rather than stopping it completely in its track. Watch what happens when Gov Palin runs in 2012. The party elites are going to join with the Dems and MSM to railroad her just like the GOP & Fox News did to Ron Paul.

17 posted on 01/04/2009 7:56:46 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88
I heard him, probably talking with Hannity, and when he started talking about bringing new people into the party I began to write him off. And he might have used the disqualifying phrase (for me): “reach out”.

IMHO... reaching out is the ONLY way we will ever be in control again. Some of the narrow mindedness on this forum will keep us out of power for a long, long, time. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the big tent philosophy as long as we have common goals.

18 posted on 01/04/2009 8:04:36 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All
I don't know why the GOP just doesn't turn to Ron Paul

A Libertarian in charge of the GOP? Surely you jest.

19 posted on 01/04/2009 8:54:11 PM PST by Sir Hailstone (I'm a Dollar-a-Day FReeper. Are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Irish Eyes; Will88
Think back eight weeks or so. We (and I use the pronoun advisedly) ran a desultory, namby-pamby trimmer whose only distinctive trait is a pathological desire to be liked by everyone, whereas the other fellow had a professionally honed message, imbecilic though it was, and promoted it enthusiastically.

Next time, given another choice between pseudo-socialism and the real thing, what do you think the marching morons will vote for? Face it: the other guys hold the patent on identity-group politics. The only things that we-can-do-that-too "reaching out" would accomplish would be to dilute conservatism and encourage even more conservatives to sit on their hands in disgust.

No, what we need to do is reach through the labels to the people themselves. That's a rant for another day, but a certain recent VP candidate gave us reason to believe that it might just work.

(And before anyone starts pointing fingers, yes, I voted. For Sarah and her running-mate. I also spent too many hours last fall doing pointless phone "surveys" from McPalin HQ in my city. Quoth the Raven.)

20 posted on 01/04/2009 9:10:52 PM PST by Tenniel2 ("When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one" -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson