Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Regeneration no longer just about braking
Gizmag.com ^ | 01/02/09 | Paul Evans

Posted on 01/02/2009 7:50:43 AM PST by Reaganesque

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
A picture of the shock absorber:

Makes sense to me. Combine these shocks with regenerative brakes, solar cells on the exposed surfaces of the vehicle, fuel cells and what have you and we might have something that could compete with a gas fueled car. We'll see. It is getting interesting out there, though.

1 posted on 01/02/2009 7:50:44 AM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Won’t work on a smooth road.


2 posted on 01/02/2009 7:54:41 AM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Good post. Thanks!


3 posted on 01/02/2009 7:54:46 AM PST by optiguy (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.----- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

BTTT


4 posted on 01/02/2009 7:54:51 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

With some of the washboard dirt roads around here, I could sell power back to the grid.


5 posted on 01/02/2009 7:56:00 AM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution - 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
If you could apply this concept to stereo systems, my neighbor could recapture most of the energy he puts into his low rider.
6 posted on 01/02/2009 7:56:21 AM PST by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Looks pretty expensive

Sir, we replaced all four shocks and rotated your tires for free!!!

Here's your bill:
$ 2,500 plus your 25 % carbon tax, 10 % state tax, 15 % federal tax
Total is $3,750

(Tips are appreciated)

7 posted on 01/02/2009 7:59:44 AM PST by Popman (Dont worry Barney Frank has your ass-ets covered!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

What about wind energy that could be captured by turbines as the car is driven?


8 posted on 01/02/2009 8:01:10 AM PST by TheThinker (Shame and guilt mongering is the Left's favorite tool of control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

The road doesn’t have to be rough. Turning, braking, accelerating and just the normal vibration from any road surface would generate electricity. Heck, you could park the vehicle and jump up and down on the bumper and it would generate electricity. If the vehicle is moving, such a system could recover some energy from that movement.


9 posted on 01/02/2009 8:02:01 AM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Just another excuse for the government not to repair potholes.


10 posted on 01/02/2009 8:03:06 AM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker

LOL!


11 posted on 01/02/2009 8:03:29 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Won’t work on a smooth road.

A smooth road is more energy efficient, now that you mention it.

12 posted on 01/02/2009 8:06:13 AM PST by Mark was here (The earth is bipolar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Any quantitative estimate of how much would be generated? Also, the more you try to recover, the firmer the ride. The more power you try to extract from a generator, the harder you have to turn it (or in this case, push it).


13 posted on 01/02/2009 8:08:05 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

I’m for anything that will allow us to say F*** Y** to OPEC....


14 posted on 01/02/2009 8:08:05 AM PST by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque; sully777; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; muleskinner; ...

Shocking! Ping!.........


15 posted on 01/02/2009 8:11:41 AM PST by Red Badger (I was sad because I had no shoes to throw, until I met a reporter who had no feet.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Me too, buddy. Me too. So long as it works.


16 posted on 01/02/2009 8:12:11 AM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I am shocked........

17 posted on 01/02/2009 8:12:25 AM PST by Red Badger (I was sad because I had no shoes to throw, until I met a reporter who had no feet.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

then it should sell well here in Minnesota.


18 posted on 01/02/2009 8:13:32 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

This is very interesting. I can see how a hydraulic drive would be much smoother and economical than a mechanical drive with more moving parts.
Approaching shocks is interesting also. I have been involved in racing and know how hot a working shock gets on a rough track. shocks are a very important part of the set up. Thats why NASCAR has shock engineers.

Harnessing the kinetic energy from shocks has a lot of potential. I find it a fascinating approach.


19 posted on 01/02/2009 8:13:49 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (Since when is paying more, but getting less, considered Patriotic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

You could add piezo-electic materials to the speakers. Vibration causes them to produce electricity. Someone has already proposed putting such materials underneath roads so that everyday traffic would generate electricity for cities. They would lay it down as part of the road building/repairing process so, it wouldn’t cost all that much more.


20 posted on 01/02/2009 8:14:42 AM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson