"A strong hand in a velvet glove... extended to the globe on behalf of the most anticipated presidency in generations. "
1 posted on
01/01/2009 9:48:36 AM PST by
melt
To: melt
Huma is still carrying her luggage for her, I see...
2 posted on
01/01/2009 9:51:24 AM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
('Taking the moderate path of appeasement leads to abysmal defeat.' - Rush on 11/05/08)
To: melt
Loser
Inevitable
Not!
3 posted on
01/01/2009 9:52:26 AM PST by
Dilbert56
(Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
At least the article mentioned Sarah. As an afterthought.
Look out, Hilly. She's comin' to git 'cha, LOL!
5 posted on
01/01/2009 9:54:18 AM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
('Taking the moderate path of appeasement leads to abysmal defeat.' - Rush on 11/05/08)
To: melt
So Hillary Clinton will become with the dawn of a new White House. Madam Secretary of State. A strong hand in a velvet glove, extended to the globe on behalf of the most anticipated presidency in generations. OH REALLY?!!?
(on both counts)
7 posted on
01/01/2009 9:55:29 AM PST by
Publius6961
(Change is not a plan; Hope is not a strategy.)
To: melt
9 posted on
01/01/2009 10:06:18 AM PST by
boomop1
To: melt
Funny, I never heard Condi Rice described as the most powerful woman in the world.
To: melt
I will look forward to all her accomplishments, I’m sure she will bring as much change to the world as she did for northern NYS. LOL!!!
11 posted on
01/01/2009 10:10:33 AM PST by
Bringbackthedraft
(Liberals fear the return of The Cleaver Family.)
To: melt
A literal and figurative PANT LOAD.
12 posted on
01/01/2009 10:11:48 AM PST by
VRWC For Truth
(Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
To: melt
New Yorker of the YearShe's been a New Yorker for how long? 7, 8 years?
To: melt
I’d never use the word “class” in conjunction with Hillary Clinton, I’d replace the “l” with an “r”.
Laura Bush? Now that’s class.
To: melt
No doubt Omarosa Obama is not amused.
16 posted on
01/01/2009 10:23:40 AM PST by
Carley
To: melt
I'm curious.
Shouldn't this fawning piece of drivel be in the 'Opinion' section of the paper, rather than the 'Politics' section?
Or is it just another example of media bias masquerading as "news"?
To: melt
***.....no American played a greater role last year in influencing the choice of the 44th President of the United States***
....than the memory of a Bill Clinton stained white house.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson