Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Government aid could save U.S. newspapers, spark debate
Reuters ^ | 12/31/08 | Robert MacMillan

Posted on 01/01/2009 7:36:57 AM PST by RangerM

Connecticut lawmaker Frank Nicastro sees saving the local newspaper as his duty. But others think he and his colleagues are setting a worrisome precedent for government involvement in the U.S. press.

Nicastro represents Connecticut's 79th assembly district, which includes Bristol, a city of about 61,000 people outside Hartford, the state capital. Its paper, The Bristol Press, may fold within days, along with The Herald in nearby New Britain.

That is because publisher Journal Register, in danger of being crushed under hundreds of millions of dollars of debt, says it cannot afford to keep them open anymore.

Nicastro and fellow legislators want the papers to survive, and petitioned the state government to do something about it. "The media is a vitally important part of America," he said, particularly local papers that cover news ignored by big papers and television and radio stations.

To some experts, that sounds like a bailout, a word that resurfaced this year after the U.S. government agreed to give hundreds of billions of dollars to the automobile and financial sectors.

Relying on government help raises ethical questions for the press, whose traditional role has been to operate free from government influence as it tries to hold politicians accountable to the people who elected them. Even some publishers desperate for help are wary of this route.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bailout; biasmeanslayoffs; houseorgan; puppetmedia; trysellingthetruth
What good is it to be in power, if you've lost your propaganda machine?

(BTW, I did a search and came up empty. Apologies if duplicate post)

1 posted on 01/01/2009 7:36:57 AM PST by RangerM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RangerM

Makes perfect sense to me. The media has provided billions of dollars of free advertising for liberal Democratic causes. Why shouldn’t the taxpayer be expected to compensate them for providing that service?


2 posted on 01/01/2009 7:38:53 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

Great, bail out the enemy.


3 posted on 01/01/2009 7:40:08 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

A press paid for and owned by the government? Why not? The DNC owns the press anyway.


4 posted on 01/01/2009 7:40:55 AM PST by ScottinVA (All I needed to know about islam I learned on 9-11.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Public radio; public TV. Why not public newspaper ?


5 posted on 01/01/2009 7:42:14 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Let’s see.....

Unionized auto workers support Democrats....auto industry gets money.

Liberal media supports Democrats...liberal media gets money.

Of course, it is Republicans that are in the pocket of special interests.


6 posted on 01/01/2009 7:44:57 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Public radio; public TV. Why not public newspaper ?
For now, at least you don't have to use public radio or public television. There are alternatives. But,if newspapers are government run, will competition be allowed?
7 posted on 01/01/2009 7:48:59 AM PST by jmcenanly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

They don’t print anything worth reading so why try to save them?


8 posted on 01/01/2009 8:08:45 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

The good citizens of CT should pay Mr Frank Nicastro a visit with roofing tar and some ‘Martha Stewart’ down pillows.


9 posted on 01/01/2009 8:11:47 AM PST by ex91B10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly
"But,if newspapers are government run, will competition be allowed?"

Newspapers are pretty much obsolete now, but no matter, the government does seem to 'run' the news media. With girly men like Crissy Mathews, he of the Obama thrill running up his leg, making public statements like "It's my job to make sure the Obama Administration works", and all the other liberal gummint lackies in the media, I'd say the government owns the media, for all intents and purposes. Just wait till they decide to place controls on the internet, including taxes and fees for emails, forcing 'fairness doctrine' restrictions on sites like FR, and blacking it out when they feel it's 'necessary', or shutting down 'anti-government' sites. I've read that the U.S. Navy has blacked out certain conservative web sites at times, limiting sailors' information. The potential for government control over everything has grown in leaps and bounds under this present Administration; look for it to get even worse under Sheik Hussein Obama.

10 posted on 01/01/2009 8:11:53 AM PST by rangeryder (If a man says something in the woods, is he still wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

We have all heard the “freedom = separation” argument with respect to religion. Imagine the outcry if a politician suggested that the Southern Baptist, Catholic, or Mormon churches deserved a bailout.


11 posted on 01/01/2009 8:12:58 AM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

The people have already given all the aid the press will ever need. Its called the 1st amendment.


12 posted on 01/01/2009 8:31:34 AM PST by KingLudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

Oh no, I am not for giving money to Newsphobes. For the definition of a Newsphobe, see the following link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2157200/posts


13 posted on 01/01/2009 9:03:38 AM PST by do the dhue (They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. - One of General Abram's men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

I’ve heard the the New York Times and several of the other “dying dailies” newspapers are quietly lobbying for Federal bailout money, too! Let’em DIE. Technologically OBSOLETE....buggy-whips in a Space Shuttle era.


14 posted on 01/01/2009 9:19:46 AM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

I wouldn’t buy a newspaper owned by a government. The only exception I would make is the Voice of America, but they’re forbidden by law to broadcast to Americans.


15 posted on 01/01/2009 9:24:16 AM PST by GAB-1955 (Kicking and Screaming into the Kingdom of Heaven! (USCG Aux))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson