Skip to comments.
Soviet MiG-21 approaches its twilight years
Associated Press ^
| 2008-12-14
| SLOBODAN LEKIC
Posted on 12/31/2008 10:42:16 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
Edited on 01/01/2009 7:29:56 AM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
Soviet MiG-21 approaches its twilight years
By SLOBODAN LEKIC Associated Press
An icon of the Cold War, the MiG-21 came to symbolize the military might of the Soviet Union as it squared off against the West in conflicts from Vietnam to Africa and the Middle East.
Now, exactly 50 years after it entered service, the jet fighter is approaching the twilight of its career in frontline service _ with NATO, the former Soviet Union's main rival.
[snip]
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; mig21; migs; russia; ussr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: sukhoi-30mki
That’s like saying Elizabeth Taylor is approaching her twilight years.
2
posted on
12/31/2008 10:45:07 PM PST
by
Rokke
To: sukhoi-30mki
3
posted on
12/31/2008 10:46:04 PM PST
by
OL Hickory
(Where is the America I knew as a boy?)
To: sukhoi-30mki
4
posted on
12/31/2008 10:49:51 PM PST
by
valkyry1
To: Rokke
I read that the F16 did adopt some of the Mig21 design elements, is this true you know of?
5
posted on
12/31/2008 10:51:49 PM PST
by
valkyry1
To: valkyry1
Yes.
The Soviets were failures in many of the things they tried.
But they were, and still are, very, very accomplished when it comes to aerospace technology.
Partly out of necessity. The Soviet Union covers 11 time zones!
6
posted on
12/31/2008 10:53:48 PM PST
by
djf
(< Tagline closed until further notice. Awaiting bailout >)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Still, more than 10,000 MiG-21s were built, making it the most widely produced jet fighter ever built. More than the F-16? Or F-4? I've gotta look that up.
7
posted on
12/31/2008 10:59:54 PM PST
by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
The Mig-21 is not stealthy. American pilots did fire Sparrow missiles at long range, because the rules of engagement precluded it in most cases. Instead, they were forced to first positively ID the Vietnamese fighters. This is where the small visual cross section helped.
The Delta-winged Mig-21, despite having a tail was not a dogfighter like the earlier Mig-15. Instead, the Vietnamese used them to swoop in at high speeds, launch their 4 Aphid infra red missiles, and then flee at high speed.
8
posted on
12/31/2008 11:00:21 PM PST
by
rmlew
(The loyal opposition to a regime dedicated to overthrowing the Constitution are accomplices.)
To: buccaneer81
Not much more than 5000 F4’s were built IIRC
9
posted on
12/31/2008 11:02:08 PM PST
by
valkyry1
To: valkyry1
Not much more than 5000 F4s were built IIRCYeah, you're right. I also saw that over 3000 F-16s are still in service. Can't be more than a few hundred that have been destroyed.
10
posted on
12/31/2008 11:04:39 PM PST
by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: valkyry1
I don’t know what specific features of the MiG-21 made it into the F16, but it did prove the value of a small, lightweight fighter to the US military.
11
posted on
12/31/2008 11:12:51 PM PST
by
ZirconEncrustedTweezers
(Some people like cupcakes better. I, for one, care less for them.)
To: valkyry1
Single seat, single engine, single tail, delta wing. Four elements of any great fighter. Of course you can actually see out of an F-16. And an F-16 has never been shot down by a Mig. And the Mig-21 was a terrible bomber.
12
posted on
12/31/2008 11:17:12 PM PST
by
Rokke
To: ZirconEncrustedTweezers
I think for one thing, the incorporation of the delta wing planform with a horizontal stab behind it.
Although on the F16, they clipped the end of the wing to give the wing a deeper chord.
13
posted on
12/31/2008 11:19:02 PM PST
by
valkyry1
To: Rokke
Of course you can actually see out of an F-16. And an F-16 has never been shot down by a Mig. And the Mig-21 was a terrible bomber.So other than those details, it was really effective ;)
14
posted on
12/31/2008 11:21:59 PM PST
by
valkyry1
To: Rokke
The Mig would/could not maintain airspeed in high gain turns like the F16, correct?
15
posted on
12/31/2008 11:24:25 PM PST
by
valkyry1
To: rmlew
the Vietnamese used them to swoop in at high speeds, launch their 4 Aphid infra red missiles, and then flee at high speed.
That's on the mark. The 21s would take off from Kep and Phuc Yen for a mugging at mach 2+ and split before engaging CAP A/C. Problem was there were friendlies in the air, Thuds, A-4s and A-6s which complicated the AOB rules. CAP was at a disadvantage due to the minimal visual and had to rely on acquisition radar (and others) to shoot without making positive visual id.
But on the bright side, at the end of the air war, the MiG 21s were stashed in caves along the Red River valley after the NVNAF lost so many assets, they couldn't afford any more. A logistical victory.
16
posted on
12/31/2008 11:29:57 PM PST
by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
“In the 1970s, the U.S. introduced two jets which outperformed the MiG-21 _ the new F-15 Eagles and F-16 Fighting Falcons. The Soviets countered with MiG-29s and Sukhoi-27s.”
Interesting how the article skips right over the Flogger (Mig-23/27).
17
posted on
12/31/2008 11:30:04 PM PST
by
DemforBush
(Millions of conservatives have got your back, Sarah!)
To: Rokke

Need a nice photo on this thread
18
posted on
12/31/2008 11:33:20 PM PST
by
Loud Mime
(Things were better when cigarette companies could advertise and lawyers could not....LM)
To: valkyry1
“The Mig would/could not maintain airspeed in high gain turns like the F16, correct?”
Correct. Although there are later variations of Mig-21’s with larger motors that can turn a little better. But an F-16 can easily turn inside a Mig and stay there until it runs out of gas, which would be long after the Mig. More importantly, the F-16 has a radar and long range missiles that make actually turning with a Mig-21 irrelevent.
19
posted on
12/31/2008 11:38:10 PM PST
by
Rokke
To: sukhoi-30mki
I believe that North Korea still has some in its inventories...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson