Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hispanics bolster Border Patrol: They now hold 52 percent of agents' jobs
Houston Chronicle ^ | December 29, 2008 | James Pinkerton

Posted on 12/31/2008 10:10:44 AM PST by reaganaut1

...

[T]he expanded border agency is now 54 percent minority. Hispanics [...] comprise 52 percent of the agents.

Since the Bush administration mandated hiring 6,000 new agents to boost the force to 18,000 by the end of this year, the ranks of Hispanic agents have mushroomed. The roughly 6,400 Hispanic agents on duty in 2006 increased 45 percent to about 9,300 last month.

...

But there are some concerns about thousands of new agents enforcing laws in the same communities where they have strong family ties, some that extend across the border.

''The problem I think that will come up are with people who are born and raised there, and have associates on both sides of the border. I don't think that's especially good from an integrity standpoint," said James Dorcy, a director of the National Association of Retired Border Patrol Officers.

''The drug cartels are trying to do everything they can to infiltrate the Border Patrol right now," Dorcy said.

His organization and the National Border Patrol Council worry that the rapid buildup of the Border Patrol, along with an outsourcing of background investigations of applicants to private contractors, has allowed unsuitable candidates to become federal agents

Their concerns have some validity, as a number of agents have been caught taking bribes to allow illegal immigrants, as well as drugs, to cross the border.

Last week a federal judge in McAllen sentenced ex-Border Patrol officer Reynaldo Zuniga, 34, to seven years in prison for drug smuggling. The officer, from the Valley city of Harlingen, was paid to pick up a cocaine smuggler on the Rio Grande and drop him off at a hamburger stand nearby.

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aliens; borderpatrol; hispanics; immigrantlist; ramosandcompean
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 12/31/2008 10:10:44 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Bienvenidos to the badged foxes guarding the chicken coop


2 posted on 12/31/2008 10:13:45 AM PST by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Why do we have to be bean-counters?


3 posted on 12/31/2008 10:17:07 AM PST by Migraine (Diversity is great... ...until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Therein lies part of the problem.


4 posted on 12/31/2008 10:17:13 AM PST by Americanexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

As long as they are Americans, and will do the job, I dont care.


5 posted on 12/31/2008 10:17:57 AM PST by Mark was here (The earth is bipolar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgc1122
How many of them are illegal aliens themselves, have relatives still in Mexico?

I believed the numbers to be much higher as every thing I read has a "spokesman" or agent who is Hispanic.

No wonder our borders are so porous.

6 posted on 12/31/2008 10:18:54 AM PST by zerosix (native sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“But there are some concerns about thousands of new agents enforcing laws in the same communities where they have strong family ties, some that extend across the border.”

Gee, ya think???


7 posted on 12/31/2008 10:19:51 AM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Fox, meet hen house.


8 posted on 12/31/2008 10:20:32 AM PST by dfwgator (I hate Illinois Marxists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here

Yep

The fact that most are fluent in the language used by the majority of the individuals they come in contact with, is a big plus.


9 posted on 12/31/2008 10:21:30 AM PST by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..

ping


10 posted on 12/31/2008 10:22:00 AM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Sadly these agents can be as pure as the driven snow and have the greatest love of America but all it would take is the drug cartel grabbing Cousin Pedro off the streets and telling the agent what he or she must do to see Pedro alive again. They are vulnerable to this sort of pressure no matter how virtuous they are. And their families members on both sides of the border are also vulnerable to be snatched or threatened. If you want affirnative action, assign them to the Canadian border and assign northerners to police the Mexican border.


11 posted on 12/31/2008 10:22:50 AM PST by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zerosix

Check out US Immigration on the US-Canada border. They’re pretty much relaxed and can be jerks at times. because they know they don’t have to deal with the politics of the mexicans pouring into the country. There’s a reason why more BP agents want the US-C positions..one just needs to deal with the cold.


12 posted on 12/31/2008 10:24:51 AM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint
Sadly,the War On Drugs has been a dismal failure except in the erosion of civil liberties and justification for the militarization of the police.

A return to the traditional American policies of the first one hundred and so years of this Republic would solve much.Legalize and tax all drugs with the provision clearly spelled out that intoxication of any form will not excuse the user from responsibility for his or her actions.Make it perfectly clear than many jobs will require continuation of drug-free testing and those who wish to use certain substances voluntarily restrict their employment options.

Prohibition didn't work in the 1920s and hasn't worked in the last 30 years either.

Those who stand to lose by legalization are the drug and dope gangs,pushers,and the statist control freaks.

13 posted on 12/31/2008 10:34:20 AM PST by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will yo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here
Several years ago I applied to the Border Patrol. They did a thorough background investigation and I had to list every one of my family members, living and dead, and their nationalities. An investigator drove over 100 miles (from Houston to College Station) to my home and interviewed me for an hour or so. So far, everything normal.

However, when I went for my actual job interview, I was blown away by the fact that only one Border Patrol employee was a caucasian. Everyone else was hispanic.

That said, you must be a citizen to get hired.

One thing the investigator asked me that stuck over the years was "have you ever done anything that you could be blackmailed for?"

14 posted on 12/31/2008 10:54:08 AM PST by I Buried My Guns (No Tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Brilliant!

Republican goal: Shore up the border by hiring more border patrol agents.

Bush accomplishment: Hand over the jobs to people who have a vested interest in not patrolling the border.


15 posted on 12/31/2008 10:54:14 AM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham

I disagree with you on legalizing drugs. For me, the closer analogy to legalizing drugs today is not what happened with prohibition but what happened with abortion. When prohibition was tried and abandoned, the general populace was still very much self-regulated by their faiths and work ethics where state welfare was not a parachute for failure to support yourself. For those reasons alone, habitual intoxication was never part of accepted culture. Those who did usually had short, brutal lives.

By the time abortion was legalized, faith had eroded big time. Kids were no longer grounded in honor and morality but instead steeped in “Do your own thing”, “if it feels good, do it”, “there’s no right or wrong”, “Imagine no religions” etc. When abortion was legalized, its proponents were claiming that there were approximately 140,000 “backstreet abortions” a year. They argued that abortion would still be rare but safe. What happened is that the government imprimatur on abortions sent a message to our younger generation that it was “okay”. Abortion skyrocketed because government has become the ultimate authority for irreligious kids. Today we see abortifacient pills advertised on television as a way to cure a “mistake”. The act of legalizing abortion defined the morality of abortion for millions of people.

Now consider the drug trade. The same effect will probably happen. Nor will it do much to curb illegal trade. Any government-sanctioned drugs are likely to be tame compared to what can be compounded by illegal drug producers. The legal drugs will whet the taste for drugs and the drug people will be glad to produce higher highs and lower lows for a price.

I do understand the argument of legalizing it but I don’t think it would work for long and we would be at the same point but with more damaging, more intoxicating, more dangerous drugs and destroyed drug addicts on our hands. With our nanny state mentality, those druggies would be burdens for decades.


16 posted on 12/31/2008 10:57:21 AM PST by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mgc1122

>>>Bienvenidos to the badged foxes guarding the chicken coop

You mean foxes like Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean?


17 posted on 12/31/2008 11:04:20 AM PST by NC28203
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Some of the best Agents in the Patrol are of Mexican descent. Unfortunately they, like their Anglo counterparts don’t curry much favor with the politically correct establishment.


18 posted on 12/31/2008 11:06:35 AM PST by Ajnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
I don't have too much problem with this, as long as all applicants are thoroughly vetted and those with extensive and close cross border ties either rejected, or sent to the Canadian border, to free up other agents to man the southern border.

I still remember how surprised I was to hear a "darker than Obama" Tejana friend rant about "those D@** Mexicans", even though her grandparent were Mexicans."

Of course my mother's family wasn't too happy with Kaiser Bill and the Austrian Corporal either, despite her great grandparents coming from near Heidelberg. (Also some of her great Aunts and Uncles too, but not her grandfather, who born in the US)

19 posted on 12/31/2008 11:06:46 AM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgc1122

“HEY, AMIGOS, OVER HERE TO THE HOLE WE’VE CUT IN THIS STUPID FENCE!”


20 posted on 12/31/2008 11:10:12 AM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson