Posted on 12/29/2008 8:54:49 AM PST by IrishMike
I have often written about the ignorance that has resulted from decades of pathetic, dumbed-down parenting and schooling, and, sadly, there's no shortage of material on this subject.
There is often a profound difference between morality and legality, and, if this were a just world, a good percentage of the American Left would be tried for treason. If that seems a radical statement, I ask you: What price should be paid for sowing the seeds of your nation's destruction? What should be the punishment for creating millions of people so ignorant, so effete, so corrupted in judgment that they are unable to sustain a free republic, resist enemies foreign and domestic, and perpetuate their culture? I'll leave that to you to decide and just talk a bit about the state of the electorate.
I have often written about the ignorance that has resulted from decades of pathetic, dumbed-down parenting and schooling, and, sadly, there's no shortage of material on this subject. In fact, you could probably read three large volumes on it and not know all Americans don't know about what they should know. However, one short article recently written by economics professor and columnist Dr. Walter Williams perhaps tells us all we need to know. It is called "Ignorance reigns supreme" and relates the findings of a national survey measuring people's knowledge of civics titled "Our Fading Heritage: Americans Fail a Basic Test on Their History and Institutions." Its findings are staggering, although not at all surprising to me. For starters, 71 percent of Americans surveyed failed the test, and the average score on it was 49 percent. As for some details, Williams tells us (some of the following information he gleaned from sources other than the survey):
Only 27 percent know the Bill of Rights expressly prohibits establishing an official religion for the United States . . . 25 percent [of college seniors] did not know that Columbus landed in the Western Hemisphere before the year 1500; 42 percent could not place the Civil War in the correct half-century; and 31 percent thought Reconstruction came after World War II . . . 50 percent of whites and more than 80 percent of blacks couldn't state in writing the argument made in a newspaper column; 56 percent could not calculate the right tip . . . 98 percent could identify rap artist Snoop Dogg and Beavis and Butt-Head, but only 34 percent knew George Washington was the general at the battle of Yorktown.
Williams then opines:
With limited thinking abilities and knowledge of our heritage, we Americans set ourselves up as easy prey for charlatans, hustlers and quacks [i.e., that is, at least 80 percent of our politicians]. If we don't know the constitutional limits placed on Congress and the White House, politicians can do just about anything they wish to control our lives, from deciding what kind of light bulbs we can use to whether the government can take over our health care system or bailout failing businesses. We just think Congress can do anything upon which they can get a majority vote.
Without a doubt. To put it differently, how can we protect our rights as Americans if we don't understand civics and the Constitution and thus cannot know what those rights are? And how can we preserve our culture and traditions – and know what we're relinquishing by not doing so and the consequences of this sin of omission – if we don't know what they are? Rhetorical questions both.
Most distressingly, the civics survey found that almost 25 percent of us believe that Congress shares its foreign policy powers with the United Nations. If Americans believe such nonsense, can we expect them to vigorously oppose efforts to move us closer to one-world government? If people already believe that a certain degree of our sovereignty is gone, then all the internationalists need do is make it official; they will be able to relinquish precisely that degree of sovereignty without opposition from those ignorant citizens.
Yet, despite this abject ignorance, we still have get-out-the-dopes drives. What percent of the electorate should actually vote? Well, take the 71 percent that failed the civics test and subtract it from the total, and you'll have the answer.
Of course, though, fewer and fewer Americans can make that calculation all the time.
Whatever, whatever, whatever. Your kids are grown, and it’s great you help out at the Sunday School. But it’s time for you to do more. Start a school. Or a daycare. Do something besides snarl on-line all day at other conservatives. Put your money where your big mouth is, woman.
Your kids are grown, and it’s great you help out at the Sunday School.
I know that you an honest person and I conclude that you accidentally missed a sentence in my previous post. I stated that my husband and I are missionaries to our denomination's local Spanish ward. This will require about 20 hours a week. I fully expect that much of that time will be spent teaching reading and English to both adults and children. In addition we help with our grandchildren's homeschool. This adds up to being far more in unpaid service than merely "helping out" on Sunday.
Ideas are very powerful and the pen is often far mightier than starting one school. Also...Please read my tag line.
The pen is mightier than the sword. Bulwer-Lytton was not the only one, nor was he the first, to have the thought. The Greek poet Euripides, who died about 406 B.C., said, "The tongue is mightier than the blade." In 1600 Shakespeare had Rosencrantz in Hamlet say that "... many wearing rapiers are afraid of goosequills." In 1621 Robert Burton wrote The Anatomy of Melancholy, in which he stated: "From this it is clear how much more cruel the pen may be than the sword." Also preceding Bulwer-Lytton was Thomas Jefferson, who in 1796 sent a letter to Thomas Paine in which he wrote: "Go on doing with your pen what in other times was done with the sword."
http://www.trivia-library.com/b/origins-of-sayings-the-pen-is-mightier-than-the-sword.htm
So this, then, is why you’re authorized to tell the rest of us that what we are doing is not good enough? Because we aren’t simply doing exactly what you are doing?
I can not defend a strawman argument of your creation.
Please post the link where I or anyone has claimed that you or anyone else was not “good enough”.
On the contrary, I have stated that you are honest, moral, and ethical and my posts have **clearly** implied that your would only do the very best for your students and would never do anything to mislead or harm them.
Don’t even try that, anyone can see what you’re up to. Singing your own praises all day, cutting others down, making arch accusations ... please. Pharisee. You’re not a conservative. You’re just a religious fanatic. We’re done, I have no more time for this. Go ahead and have the last word.
No I don't. I wish one of the conservative think tanks would pick up on the idea....Or...Maybe the Rose and Milton Friedman foundation.
Conservatives **must** stop waiting for Godot. Government vouchers and tax credits will never come soon enough to save our nation. We must act now and do so privately.
The one draw back that I see would be zoning and health regulations being thrown against the conservative “mini-school” teachers. But...Honestly, why should they be held to stricter standards than ...say...home daycare providers?
Thanks for the ping!
Because even if we now balance the budget and make spending equal to taxes, we will still have trillions in debt unfortunately.
I missed that one also. I said to decrease both taxes and spending, but what do I know. Anyway, now we have the Democrats.
Oh, I guess that was a poorly worded question as I took it to mean that those things were in effect from the word go.
Actually that is a pretty good list of questions - The only one I really had to think about was the Socrates/Plato one.
Makes you think that Americans need to pass refresher courses before they are allowed to vote every four years
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.