Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/28/2008 11:57:09 PM PST by mtk1980
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: mtk1980
Anyone who wants to WIN will definately use "disproportionate" force.
2 posted on 12/28/2008 11:59:52 PM PST by expatguy (Support "An American Expat in Southeast Asia" - DONATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980

NO. Too slow, too little and not enough. (My opinion)


3 posted on 12/29/2008 12:00:59 AM PST by This_far
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980

In a word, no.


4 posted on 12/29/2008 12:07:50 AM PST by Danae (Amerikan Unity My Ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980

“Did Israel Use “Disproportionate Force” in Gaza?”

I hope so.

You don’t win a war by using equal force.

Just consider what we would do if Mexico was launching rockets into San Diego killing Americans on a regular basis...


5 posted on 12/29/2008 12:16:16 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980

As I recall, if you find yourself in a “fair fight,” you need to rethink your tactics.

How can their response be “disproportinate” with Hamas’s almost daily missile shelling of Israel for years?


6 posted on 12/29/2008 12:17:16 AM PST by DakotaRed (Don't you wish you had supported a conservative when you had the chance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980
What is with this concern that Israel abide by International Law TM???

Are we to believe that launching rocket and mortar attacks on Israeli civilians is all peachy with International LawTM???

Why is it that only one of the participants in a fight against Muslims is expected to abide by International LawTM???

7 posted on 12/29/2008 12:25:28 AM PST by TChris (So many useful idiots...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980

This has been bugging me every time I hear the phrase! Since Hamas has been lobbing approx. 3000+ missiles over into Israel in the past year, then ‘disproportionate’ means Israel gets to lob 3000+ missiles over into Gaza over the next year, correct??

/sarc

Praying for the peace of Jerusalem!!


8 posted on 12/29/2008 12:26:27 AM PST by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980

War should never use anything but disproportional force because disproportional force ensures that war doesn’t pay for those you are attacking. The idea of “proportional force” comes from academic idiots who want to make war rational, yet they don’t seem to grasp that if one makes war rational, then war becomes just another policy tool and if the aggressors can count on a proportional response, then they have no reason not to use force in the first place. No, war should be as disproportional and irrational as possible to make it as unthinkable as possible for your enemies. Anyone who talks about “proportional warfare” doesn’t grasp warfare. To quote Patton wrote in 1930, “War is not a contest with gloves. It is resorted to only when laws (which are rules) have failed.” Patton understood war, even then. Ivory tower academics don’t and shouldn’t be let anywhere near military policy.


9 posted on 12/29/2008 12:33:05 AM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980

It’s not a tennis match with a referee to keep it “fair.”


10 posted on 12/29/2008 1:00:10 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980

“Proportionate Force??” What the Hell is that?

It is a silly academic concept, like “Reasonable Force” — you know, the standard that the Law in some jurisdictions makes you apply if you are defending yourself or someone else from assault. It is easy to analyze in hindsight, but very difficult to apply while you are dodging the meat-ax that the psychopath is swinging at you.

“Disproportionate Force?” Hello, they just fired a rocket at you: their intentions are not in doubt. They do not like you and they mean you harm. They are hostile and if they had anything bigger they would launch that at you too. If they could they would exterminate you and all your mates, just for fun.

Short of squashing them all like a bug, what is the correct, academic “Proportional” response to all that?

Better seek some guidance from one of those pointy-headed intellectuals with thick glasses who made up these rules. Even tho’ he’s never had a real fight in all his life, he has a professional opinion on the subject and he’s presented papers in peer-reviewed Journals on “Proportional Force”. In fact, he’s a recognized International Expert!


11 posted on 12/29/2008 1:09:42 AM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980

Yes way too limited. There are no “civilians in a war”. They are all one big happy family of crazed muslims. They were all dancing in the streets on 911. Let them die in the same streets.


12 posted on 12/29/2008 1:36:16 AM PST by screaminsunshine (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980
According to international law, Israel is not required to calibrate its use of force precisely

There's no such thing as "international law".

14 posted on 12/29/2008 1:49:05 AM PST by Jim Noble (Long May Our Land Be Bright With Freedom's Holy Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980

Is there such a thing as “disproportionate force” in a war?


15 posted on 12/29/2008 1:53:23 AM PST by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980
Did the palesimians uses "disproportionate" force firing from, and on, UNARMED CIVILIAN AREAS?

Feed em fish heads Israel!!!!

17 posted on 12/29/2008 2:42:29 AM PST by rawcatslyentist (Proud non productive worker under directive 10-289)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980

is israel using disproportional force? well this belongs to every ones personal view in my oppinion. if you look at the numbers only then yes. 1 killed israeli and 300+ killed palestinians in retaliation is disproportianal but on the other side what should israel do wait longer (so the numbers of killed jews can rise to make it more “proportinal”) bevore they retaliate??? the real tragedy in my oppinion is that both “sides” are stuck in a no win situation and many inocent people on both sides will die because of that in the future. and sad to say but it looks like this will go on forever.


18 posted on 12/29/2008 2:42:52 AM PST by austrian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980

All this hand wringing about Israel’s actions... Where was the hand wringing last week? What about the months and years before that, while the Palestinians lobbed rockets into Israel. Where was the hand wringing then?

These (oh me oh my those evil Israelis bemoaning) back stabbing bastards should be tarred and feathered.

Where was the call for a ceasefire when the Palestinians were the ones shooting rockets into Israel?


20 posted on 12/29/2008 3:02:17 AM PST by DoughtyOne (I see that Kenya's favorite son has a new weekly Saturday morning radio show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980
ĩ
21 posted on 12/29/2008 3:11:16 AM PST by arthurus ( H.L. Mencken said, "Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980

Disproportionate Force... what a preposterous term. I remember in the final days before leaving for Iraq, my Soldiers were in a use of force briefing prepared by lawyers and being faithfully regurgitated by a young LT. This disproportionate force B.S. was delivered to them and as an example of it’s relevance they were told if they were being shot at with small arms by a single enemy, the appropriate response would be to engage that enemy only with small arms fire until it was suppressed or neutralized. After this sensitizing, cultural awareness and international law nonsense was over - I held them in place and told them; if someone means to do you or your buddy harm - you bring to bear all the firepower at your disposal with extreme violence, shock and destruction. Break the enemy of it’s will to fight as quickly and permanently as possible. Following the initial occupation, my unit spent 15 months in Baghdad and lost not a single Soldier to enemy action.


22 posted on 12/29/2008 3:34:18 AM PST by Army MP Retired (There Will Be Many False Prophets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980
Its a mistake to think you can adjudicate war. If war can be managed by attorneys with brief cases, with suits and ties, serving subpoenas and fashioning brilliant arguments before judges behind mahogany benches, you are not yet at war.War is by its very nature an extra-legal enterprise, it is the state of affairs that exists when lawyers and policemen and judges are no longer able to manage a confrontation. At that point, the men in suits take a recess, and the men with guns go in to kill the men who couldn’t be reasoned with, them and anyone standing near them, you wipe out their leadership and everything of value that can be used to keep them alive, you wipe out whole towns if necessary, whole armies, and when you have completely re-drawn the map and created a new status quo to replace the old toxic one, only then do you let the men in suits with the briefcases resume control.War is the parenthesis that occupies the space between the failure of the old status quo and the birth of the new one. When rule-of-law resumes, when a new circumstance has emerged that permits the resumption of rule-of-law, the war is over

Borrowed from a Freeper

24 posted on 12/29/2008 4:12:51 AM PST by Popman (Dont worry Barney Frank has your ass-ets covered!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mtk1980
America responded proportionately, time and time again to the attacks on our people and our way of life, wrought by the religion of peace, from about the time just past the Munich Olympics until September 10th, 2001. For the policy of measured, restrained and proportional responses, America suffered (on it's own soil) it's greatest wound since World War II, of which occurred on September 11th, 2001. So much for proportional responses...
26 posted on 12/29/2008 4:47:30 AM PST by freepersup (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson