Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Hooking Up’ Is Nothing New (Worried parents of commitment-phobe coeds, take comfort)
Pajamas Media ^ | Dec 27,2008 | Katherine Berry

Posted on 12/27/2008 10:22:47 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Earlier this week, I got a frantic call from a friend whose daughter has been away for her first semester at college. “She’s not bringing her boyfriend home,” my friend wailed. “In fact, she says he’s not really her boyfriend at all!”

The “he” in question was a male my friend’s daughter had repeatedly mentioned she spent time with socially: going to the movies and out to dinner, seeing concerts, once spending an entire weekend camping at a state park. Oh, there were always other people around, but the regularity of their contact led my friend to believe her daughter was involved in a relationship of romantic significance.

What my friend failed to understand is that her daughter hasn’t been actually serious with this boy; rather, they’ve been “hooking up,” a social norm that some blame for [1] the demise of dating since it involves participation in group social activities often followed by couples pairing off for some form of commitment-free sexual activity at the end of the night.

Of course, not every instance of hooking up involves actual intercourse. The author of a recent New York Times [1] op-ed piece on the matter explains that’s not the case:

I should point out that just because more young people seem to be hooking up instead of dating doesn’t mean that they’re having more sex (they’ve been having less, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) or having sex with strangers (they’re more likely to hook up with a friend, according to a 2006 paper in the Journal of Adolescent Research).

So if they’re not having sex every time they hook up, why don’t they just call it dating? The answer comes down to recognizing that the attitudes of this generation of college students toward sex and relationships — specifically that the two aren’t necessarily related — is the direct legacy of previous generations.

For those who remember our cultural heritage, this is nothing new. Legalization of the birth control pill in the 1960s precipitated a sexual revolution and an era of “free love.” Cocaine fueled public sex in discos throughout the ’70s and morphed into the rave scene of the 1980s when club-goers popped ecstasy and humped like bunnies.

But while previous generations still followed the dating paradigm — becoming increasingly sexually intimate as their emotional intimacy grew over a series of one-on-one encounters — there is [2] no expectation of emotional intimacy before hooking up among 20-somethings. It is, in that sense, the epitome of the “free love” and sexual liberation their parents sought during their own college years.

Of course, that’s not something easily explained to this generation of parents who are so accustomed to [3] hovering like helicopters and micro-managing their children’s lives right down to enticing their teens into signing [4] purity pledges. Sure, they may have had their wild years in college, but the thought of their children experiencing the same thing brings on panic attacks. Never mind that their kids might be opting to hook up because they [5] know they’re not ready for relationships, or that they’re more interested in focusing on their studies and future careers than finding a future spouse.

Perhaps parents should take comfort from one of the largest studies of the [6] sociology behind hooking up. In her book Hooking Up: Sex, Dating, and Relationships on Campus (New York University Press, 2008), Professor Kathleen A. Bogel explains that even after years of hooking up on campus, college students ultimately follow the same traditional paths their parents did, even if they continue to find it a bit confusing.

When students leave college, there is a discernable shift to more formal dating. It was amazing to interview young alumni who were very much a part of the hookup culture in college who now say that they almost exclusively go on dates (except when they are “down the shore,” i.e., at beach resorts during the summer in a very college-like atmosphere). But the transition to the post-college dating scene was not necessarily an easy one. Many of the 20-something-year-old men and women I spoke with were confused over how to act in certain scenarios after college, not knowing if they were on a date or just “hanging out and hooking up.” Some of the people I interviewed had never been on a formal date until after college, so figuring out the rules for the “new” system was a big adjustment for them.

Just as their parents managed to figure out that “new” system, so will today’s college students; they’re just going to do it in their own time and at their own pace. But if there’s one benefit to all of the hooking up they’ve been doing in college, it’s that they’ll have a better idea of the type of person they do want to settle down with since they will have tried out so many other types. Also, for all of their experience, they’ll probably be pretty darn good in bed.

Not that I’m about to tell that to my friend.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Article printed from Pajamas Media: http://pajamasmedia.com

URL to article: http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/hooking-up-is-nothing-new/

URLs in this post: [1] the demise of dating: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/13/opinion/13blow.html

[2] no expectation of emotional intimacy before hooking up: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/2/3/3/1/pages23315/p23315-2.php

[3] hovering like helicopters: http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/helicopter-parents-heading-for-a-crash/

[4] purity pledges: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/ReproductiveHealth/story?id=5906523&page=1

[5] know they’re not ready for relationships: http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2008/12/14/boo_hoo_hookup.html

[6] sociology behind hooking up: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/01/29/hookups


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hookingup; moralabsolutes; shackingup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 12/27/2008 10:22:48 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“But if there’s one benefit to all of the hooking up they’ve been doing in college, it’s that they’ll have a better idea of the type of person they do want to settle down with since they will have tried out so many other types. Also, for all of their experience, they’ll probably be pretty darn good in bed.”

I’m sorry to say but this kind of thing just makes it harder to be ever satisfied.


2 posted on 12/27/2008 10:25:58 AM PST by Maelstorm (Ignorance is bliss. When no one knows what you are doing you can do what you want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hooking up? What’s that?

Yes, I have been living under a rock for the last 23 years.


3 posted on 12/27/2008 10:29:15 AM PST by wastedyears (In Canada, Santa says "Ho Ho, eh?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bump for later reading.


4 posted on 12/27/2008 10:30:26 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (I want a hippopotamus for Christmas. Only a hippopotamus will do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Having string free sex and going on about your merry way. Not just for the hound dog boys anymore.


5 posted on 12/27/2008 10:31:00 AM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yes. And in addition to the benefits you mentioned, your friend’s daughter might be able to make thousands in a Valtrex commercial.

Just a matter of time....


6 posted on 12/27/2008 10:33:39 AM PST by TFMcGuire (Life is tough. It is even tougher if you are stupid--John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Here's an interesting take on this "sexual freedom" from an MRA, of all people.
7 posted on 12/27/2008 10:38:11 AM PST by TwelveOfTwenty (How much money has your 401K lost since the Democrats took Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

How do I describe this? There is the polite way - Friends with “benefits” or there is the crass way, “f***buddies”.


8 posted on 12/27/2008 10:38:29 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

I don’t know, I’ve never bothered with any of that stuff. Ever


9 posted on 12/27/2008 10:39:03 AM PST by wastedyears (In Canada, Santa says "Ho Ho, eh?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What I’ve observed for a long time is that the people who dated a lot of people in high school continue to do so at the expense of marriages and long term relationships. They always seem to find somebody new. Kind of like Hollywood. And I always think there was a lot of hooking up. I think they used to call them one night stands. There’s nothing new under the Sun. It partly has to do with opportunity.


10 posted on 12/27/2008 10:43:02 AM PST by LongTimeMILurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Given the number of STDs out there, the likelihood of abortion if a pregnancy results from a tryst with a guy who isn’t even a boyfriend and the emotional baggage one brings into a marriage from past sexual partners, I’m not comforted by this information at all.


11 posted on 12/27/2008 10:45:39 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (I want a hippopotamus for Christmas. Only a hippopotamus will do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
“f***buddies”

Oh, OK.

12 posted on 12/27/2008 10:46:42 AM PST by randog (Hope is a bad business plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

Also referred to as “friends with benefits”. . . .


13 posted on 12/27/2008 10:49:39 AM PST by Salgak (Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border: I dare you to try and cross it. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
So now the straight people behave like homosexuals. Isn't that special.

No need for gay marriage, the straight kind has been homosexualized.

14 posted on 12/27/2008 10:51:54 AM PST by trek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Yeah, agree.

Using the “logic” in that statement from the article, a hooker has the best odds of finding a mate, as she “tried out so many other types.”


15 posted on 12/27/2008 10:54:27 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Spending four years in casual relationships that are intimate but yet not really intimate, relationships that are transient and just expected to have a nebulous, finite duration ... expected to drift into nothingness at some point ... I find it very hard to believe that this won't result in an increase in our already staggeringly high divorce rates.

People need to figure out that the dominant social patterns (the "everybody's doing it" concepts) are ALL geared toward hurting society. Drugs, divorce, casual sex, homosexuality, porn, whatever. Civilization is under assault and saying "tish, tish it's always been this way" is a good way to show people that you've bought into the lie.

16 posted on 12/27/2008 10:57:41 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

LOL Apparently I have too. I haven’t the foggiest notion what it is.


17 posted on 12/27/2008 11:08:25 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

A slight variation of your “crass” term actually is the term the college kids use. Check out urbandictionary.com.


18 posted on 12/27/2008 11:09:51 AM PST by Dawn531
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Gee, young people having sex. How unusual.


19 posted on 12/27/2008 11:10:21 AM PST by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Neither is "swinging" although it merely trickled down to other classes of people as mass affluence reached the west.

"Hooking up" is not something to be taken lightly. I am the farthest thing from a churchman, but the consequences of disease (you can still get HPV even with condoms) and unwanted pregnancy are not a laughing matter.

20 posted on 12/27/2008 11:12:17 AM PST by Clemenza (Red is the Color of Virility, Blue is the Color of Impotence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson