Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

“Yes he did.”

If he had authority over the Confederacy then his Emancipation Proclamation would have freed the slaves. It freed no one, and you know it. You can cover your ears and chant “lalalalalalalalalala” all you want, but the fact remains the Confederate States of America was a separate and sovereign nation for the four years it existed. The only influence Lincoln had over it was at the point of a gun.


63 posted on 12/29/2008 5:27:09 PM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: ought-six
The only influence Lincoln had over it was at the point of a gun.

Yeah, like Mao said.
65 posted on 12/29/2008 5:29:11 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: ought-six
If he had authority over the Confederacy then his Emancipation Proclamation would have freed the slaves.

It did.

It freed no one, and you know it.

What it meant was that slaves could flee their masters and not have to worry about being returned if caught, as the Fugitive Slave Laws required. And hundreds of thousands of Southern slaves took advantage of it.

You can cover your ears and chant “lalalalalalalalalala” all you want, but the fact remains the Confederate States of America was a separate and sovereign nation for the four years it existed.

No other country at the time agreed with you. In their eyes the confederacy was a rebellious part of the U.S. No more, and no less.

69 posted on 12/29/2008 6:16:09 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson