Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AG takes himself out of Madoff fraud probe[Attorney General Michael Mukasey]
AP ^ | 17 Dec 2008 | PETE YOST and MARCY GORDON

Posted on 12/21/2008 10:37:57 AM PST by BGHater

The fraud investigation of Wall Street money manager Bernard L. Madoff took unusual twists Wednesday as the U.S. attorney general removed himself and the Securities and Exchange Commission looked into the relationship between Madoff's niece and a former SEC attorney who reviewed Madoff's business.

The developments reflect growing criticism that Wall Street and regulators in Washington have grown too close. Madoff himself has boasted of his ties to the SEC.

The question of Madoff's connection to regulators goes to the heart of the investigation of the alleged $50 billion fraud, SEC Chairman Christopher Cox told reporters.

Congress jumped into the Madoff scandal, too. The chairman of the House capital markets subcommittee, Rep. Paul Kanjorski, D-Pa., announced an inquiry that will begin early next month into what may be the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time and how the government failed to detect it.

In New York, Madoff showed up at the federal courthouse to sign some papers in his case, wearing a baseball cap and walking silently past a reporter who asked Madoff whether he had anything to say to his alleged victims. Free on $10 million bail, Madoff now has a curfew and an ankle-bracelet to monitor his movements.

U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey recused himself from the Madoff probe because his son, Marc Mukasey, is representing Frank DiPascali, a top financial officer at Madoff's investment firm. The Justice Department refused to say when Mukasey became aware of the conflict but confirmed Wednesday he was removing himself from all aspects of the case.

DiPascali was the Madoff employee who had the most day-to-day contact with the firm's investors. Several described him as the man they reached by phone when they had questions about the firm's investment strategy, or wanted to add or subtract money from their accounts.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: dipascali; economy; madoff; mukasey; spitzer

1 posted on 12/21/2008 10:37:57 AM PST by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Can the corruption get any more widespread???


2 posted on 12/21/2008 10:40:01 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Rats ... leaving a sinking ship.


3 posted on 12/21/2008 10:42:25 AM PST by OldNavyVet (Character counts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater


Turn on the light and the rats and roaches start to scatter.
Nothing to see here folks ... move along.
4 posted on 12/21/2008 10:45:22 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life ;o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Can the corruption get any more widespread???

Let's hope that it doesn't extend into the command structure of the armed services....it's coming to that.

5 posted on 12/21/2008 10:49:15 AM PST by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Free on $10 million bail

I thought and read that he didn't make bail.

What do I expect is the drive-by media .

6 posted on 12/21/2008 10:59:40 AM PST by razorback-bert (Save the planet...it is the only known one with beer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

It will be interesting to see how many high-profile Jews in government have to be excluded from roles in regulatory, legal or criminal actions because they were victims or they’re closely related to victims.

For example: Let’s say that Spitzer had not been caught schtupping the girlie. He’d still be AG on NY State, and he’d be the johnny-on-the-spot for going after “crooked” Wall St actors whom the SEC ignored. That’s how Spitzer has been styling himself since the sub-prime blowup.

Except that Spitzer is a Madoff victim too. He’d have to recuse himself.


7 posted on 12/21/2008 11:05:39 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

I really ‘don’t’ wanna know where the money went. I have a bad feeling.


8 posted on 12/21/2008 11:08:00 AM PST by BGHater (Obama is a Neocon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
"For example: Let’s say that Spitzer had not been caught schtupping the girlie. He’d still be AG on NY State,......"

Spitzer was governor of New York when he got caught "schtupping".

9 posted on 12/21/2008 11:15:30 AM PST by Mila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mila

Yes, you’re right. Brain fart.

Spitzer would have been all over this Madoff deal tho. There would be no higher-profile case for him to launch the “All Elliot, All the Time” news channel service.

And even if he were still governor, he’d look like a dope, because he got sucked into a deal that was “too good to be true” on the face of it.


10 posted on 12/21/2008 11:19:09 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

I do want to know where the money went. I have a ‘bad feeling’ too. It is likely going to expose rampant corruption inside the financial regulator agencies, as well as a layered fraud in non-profits, banks, hedge funds, etc.

We can probably agree that given the actors involved, it wouldn’t be a good show for the liberal Democrats from NYC/NJ/FL.


11 posted on 12/21/2008 11:21:10 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

“According to a National Public Radio report, Mr. Spitzer revealed at a holiday party this week that his family real estate firm had invested money with Bernard L. Madoff, the financier who authorities have said confessed to a $50 billion fraud.”


12 posted on 12/21/2008 11:22:08 AM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Enough of this. Make Madoff an honorary Congressman in charge of Social Security. He is a pro.


13 posted on 12/21/2008 11:24:27 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey recused himself from the Madoff probe because his son, Marc Mukasey, is representing Frank DiPascali, a top financial officer at Madoff's investment firm. The Justice Department refused to say when Mukasey became aware of the conflict but confirmed Wednesday he was removing himself from all aspects of the case.

No, there's nothing suspicious about this....

14 posted on 12/21/2008 11:26:20 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Ten bucks says Mukasey was actually an investor in Madoff’s scheme.


15 posted on 12/21/2008 11:29:53 AM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I wonder if any of this caused that ‘breakdown’ weeks before the Madoff scandal became known.
16 posted on 12/21/2008 11:33:52 AM PST by BGHater (Obama is a Neocon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Someboidy in the Boston, NYC and DC SEC offices was running interference for Bernie Maddoff. This person(s) needs to get 20 years in jail.


17 posted on 12/21/2008 11:42:42 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Mukasey’s son didn’t have to accept a Madoff partner as a client. But he did, and both Mukaseys knew full well that the elder would have to recuse himself as a result. There’s a reason for this.

I don’t know yet what the reason is yet, but there’s a reason.
This stuff doesn’t happen in a vacuum.


18 posted on 12/21/2008 2:20:06 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson