Posted on 12/19/2008 4:41:24 PM PST by neverdem
The U.S. Army is deploying the same kind of "math and missiles" unit that defeated roadside bombs in Iraq, to Afghanistan. For the last two years, "Task Force Odin" has used of manned and UAV aerial reconnaissance aircraft, along with pattern analysis and data mining, to find IEDs (roadside bombs), and the people who plant them in Iraq.
Task Force Odin was reported in the media mainly as aircraft and UAVs watching the roads for signs of IEDs, and UAVs, while helicopters and gunships opened fire on terrorists trying to set up roadside bombs. Explosions and dead bodies are more of mass media staple than massive use of math, no matter how critical the number crunching was to the undertaking.
Task Force Odin is really about two very different technologies. On the one hand there was the effort to provide Internet like access to live video feeds from aircraft and UAVs. The U.S. Air Force and SOCOM (Special Operations Command) have been particularly keen on this, and has shared the technology with the other services, and friendly nations. The less publicized effort was Constant Hawk. This was a U.S. Army image analysis system that's basically just another pattern analysis system. However, it's been a very successful system when it comes to finding newly planted IEDs. Last year, the U.S. Army named Constant Hawk one of the top ten inventions of the year. The army does this to give some of the more obscure, yet very valuable, developments some well deserved recognition.
Pattern analysis is one of the fundamental tools Operations Research (OR) practitioners have been using since World War II (when the newly developed field of OR got its first big workout). Pattern analysis is widely used on Wall Street, by engineers, law enforcement, marketing specialists, and now, the military. Constant Hawk uses a special video camera system to observe a locality and find useful patterns of behavior. Some of the Constant Hawk systems are mounted on light (C-12s, mainly) aircraft, others are mounted on ground structures. Special software compares photos from different times. When changes are noted, they are checked more closely, which has resulted in the early detection of thousands of roadside bombs and terrorist ambushes. This has largely eliminated roadside bomb attacks on supply convoys, which travel the same routes all the time. But those routes are also watched by Constant Hawk. No matter what the enemy does, the Hawk will notice. Eventually, the Hawk, and several other efforts, morphed into Task Force Odin. The Task Force Odin led to the death of over 3,000 terrorists caught in the act of setting up roadside bombs, or lying in wait to set them off and attack their victims with gunfire. Hundreds more terrorists were captured, and many thousands of roadside bombs were avoided or destroyed before they could go off.
All this geeekery works, and the troops like tools of this sort mainly because the systems retain photos of areas they have patrolled, and allows them to retrieve photos of a particular place on a particular day. Often, the troops returning from, or going out on a patrol, can use the pattern analysis skills we all have, to spot something suspicious, or potentially so.
A related math tool is predictive analysis. This has been widely used in Iraq to determine who the bombers are, where they are, and where they are most likely to place their bombs next. This has enabled the geeks-with-guns (the Army OR specialists) to offer regular "weather reports" about expected IED activity. The troops take these reports very seriously, especially by those who run the hundreds of daily convoys that move people and supplies around Iraq. If your route is predicted to be "hot", you pay extra attention that day, and often spot IEDs that, as predicted, were there. Usually, the predictions are used to send the engineers and EOD (Explosive Ordnance Disposal) teams out to scout and clean the route. It's the feedback from these guys that has brought the geeks their reputation. If the geeks, and their tools (computers, aerial images, and math), say there is something bad out there, they are generally right. For the geeks, it's all pretty obvious. Given enough data, you can predict all sorts of things, or just about anything, really. But to many people, including most reporters, it's all still magic. Task Force Odin is the latest name for an effort that has been going on for over four years, and traces its origins back to World War II, and the invention of Operations Research in the decade before that.
Afghanistan is different from Iraq, in terms of geography and the psychology of the enemy. But this doesn't matter to the math machine. It analyzes, it understands, and it tells you what the bad guys are up to and where they are.
This is a big key in the intelligence cycle. Why this shit is posted just blows my mind.
Yeah. Some thing one should just let the enemy assign to ‘evil spirits’...
All part of what the rags call "American magic." They fear it.
But what have we been doing the last 50 years? Handing out PhDs to them in math and physics like they're so many popsicles. It'll eventually come back to hurt us, too. Because the math machine doesn't care who uses it or who gets hurt.
I don't believe anything here is classified, or StrategyPage.com would be prosecuted. Wouldn't letting the enemy know that "we got their number" be very demoralizing?
You mean like the NYT has been prosecuted every time they have disclosed critical methods on their front page?
It’s posted becuase it’s not even remotely sensitive information. It’s not successful on account of subterfuge or complexity.
Basically the article is saying that whatever the enemy does will be noticed, analyzed and acted upon. It is not specific enough to be useful to the enemy.
Like Borels Monkeys ?
Variations go back to Aristotle, but the modern version of the infinite-monkey theorem was introduced in 1913 by French mathematician Émile Borel. You know the deal: An infinite number of monkeys pecking at typewriters for an infinite length of time will “almost surely” produce the complete works of Shakespeare. Seems unlikely, because our minds have a hard time grasping the infinite.
Mathematically, it’s true.
Why they were not, I would like to know.
Here's his NYT obit picture from Aug 2007:
LMAO !!
“This is a big key in the intelligence cycle. Why this shit is posted just blows my mind.”
Bet the terrorists have downloaded the operational manual long ago.
You and me both, you and me both, my FRiend...
I'm almost certain this is the technology Bob Woodward was making reference to when interviewed by 60 Minutes several months ago. He was saying if he were one of the bad guys in Iraq and knew what the U.S. was capable of, he'd get the hell out of town.
Do you think that the enemy doesn’t know that our guys are VERY good at finding IED’s and killing terrorists?
Knowing how we are VERY good at finding IED's gives them a place to start thinking about ways to game our system.
If I were running military ops I would use the MSM jackals to release DISINFORMATION for perusal by my enemies. For example, this article emphasizes the role of UAVs in finding IEDs. Maybe that’s not the key at all. Or maybe it is. Keep the enemy guessing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.