Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/19/2008 9:38:13 AM PST by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ari-freedom
It is sometimes claimed that changes in radiation from space, so-called galactic cosmic rays,

Not COSIMIC rays you freaking morons. SOLAR ONES!! Solar emitions go in cycles Cosmic ones are the background radiation of the universe. No one claims THOSE cause global warming.
2 posted on 12/19/2008 9:40:42 AM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom

Cosmic rays are much different than solar thermal radiation.


4 posted on 12/19/2008 9:45:20 AM PST by Flightdeck (Go Longhorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom

How convienient. What made them make such a silly claim, Satan?


7 posted on 12/19/2008 9:47:42 AM PST by Camel Joe ("All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others"- The Pigs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom

One can easily detect the bias of an article by noting whether the phenomenon is being considered to affect “global warming” or “climate change”. The former assumes global warming and shows that the writer is primarily concerned with shoring up their failing theory.


8 posted on 12/19/2008 9:49:51 AM PST by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...


FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH


Quoting 'psudoscience daily' can be bad for your health...
9 posted on 12/19/2008 9:49:58 AM PST by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom
Did they use the hadCRUT or GISS or UAH temperature databases, or did they use the UN Climate Council one that had Medieval Warm Period and Maunder Minimum taken out, I wonder?
11 posted on 12/19/2008 9:56:41 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom

How hilarious.

The sun, which is the ultimate source of warmth on the earth and daily heats and cools us, couldn’t possibly be the cause of temperature variations.

No, the real culprit has to be an increase of carbon in the atmosphere from 350 per MILLION to 370 or so!


12 posted on 12/19/2008 9:57:49 AM PST by Elpasser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom

This reminds me of THE LAST CENTURION, a current novel absolutely every freeper should read. The narrator, an unapologetic conservative, is apoplectic with the idiots who continue to trumpet global warming nonsense even as the planet slips into a “mini ice age.”

MM


13 posted on 12/19/2008 9:58:13 AM PST by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom


I dunno, those cosmic rays are nothing to mess around with!
16 posted on 12/19/2008 10:01:40 AM PST by GodBlessRonaldReagan (Wakka-ding-hoy - battle cry of the Plexus Rangers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom
However, the researchers who stick to this hypothesis find little support amongst colleagues.

Ignaz Semmelweis stuck to his hypothesis that "childbed fever" could be lessened/prevented if doctors attending women who had recently given birth washed their hands well between patients, despite finding little support amongst colleagues.

Copernicus stuck to his hypothesis that the Earth was not the center of the universe, despite finding little support amongst colleagues.

As Michael Crichton put it,

Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.

17 posted on 12/19/2008 10:06:07 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom

There are decades of research correlating ice core samples to solar activity. Researchers can see the cores correspond. There is research correlating mud core samples that correlate climate change to solar activity.


20 posted on 12/19/2008 10:12:11 AM PST by egannacht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom

Cosmic Craze? What Cosmic Craze?......................


22 posted on 12/19/2008 10:16:08 AM PST by Red Badger (I was sad because I had no shoes to throw, until I met a reporter who had no feet.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom

Cosmic rays are too minuscule to create a warming trend but minuscule amounts of additional CO2 from humans is creating a warming trend without a doubt?


24 posted on 12/19/2008 10:18:26 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom

Well we know it’s not carbon dioxide.


26 posted on 12/19/2008 10:45:13 AM PST by ChessExpert (The Dow was at 12,400 when Democrats took control of Congress. What is it today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom
Cosmic rays?! WHAT A BUNCH OF IDIOTS!!! LOL!!!
27 posted on 12/19/2008 11:07:07 AM PST by LiberConservative (That temperatures are actually falling now illustrates how fast the world is warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom

>> Center for Climate and Environmental Research <<

IE: a think tank set up to create data to support global-warming lunacy. Otherwise it would be a Center for Atmosphetic Science, or something like that.


29 posted on 12/19/2008 11:53:13 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom
It is the combination of increased Cosmic Rays and Decreased Solar Energy that cause Global Cooling. Just look at what is happening in the Northern US this winter for an example of the process. Record snow levels, record cold. Science that is backed by real time observation. Gee. What a concept. So conversely, the combination of Decreased Cosmic Rays and Increased Solar Energy causes Global Warming and Drought. That theory just gained weight in Eastern Australia by examining drought rates over the last 100 years.
31 posted on 12/19/2008 1:22:46 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom; Genesis defender; proud_yank; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

34 posted on 12/19/2008 2:50:23 PM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom
I doubt Cosmic Ray is in a condition to explain much of anything.


37 posted on 12/20/2008 5:15:44 AM PST by uglybiker (1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d 2 g3t l41d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson