Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

“Has someone got an explanation for why I should see it differently?”

They really are apples and oranges. The interceptor missiles are small and have no warhead. They just hit the target and use kinetic energy to destroy it. It is not going to be mistaken for a ballistic missile with a warhead which would be much larger.

The problem the Russians have with it is not that it might be offensive but that they think it might actually work defensively and that diminishes their nuclear threat.


19 posted on 12/19/2008 3:09:58 AM PST by james500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: james500; DoughtyOne
The problem the Russians have with it is not that it might be offensive but that they think it might actually work defensively and that diminishes their nuclear threat.

That's partly true but it doesn't stops here. The continuation is that the Russians believe the USA will attack Russia with conventional means when they see no threat in the Russian nukes.

28 posted on 12/19/2008 6:18:27 AM PST by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: james500

Thanks James.


41 posted on 12/19/2008 11:03:13 AM PST by DoughtyOne (I see that Kenya's favorite son has a new weekly Saturday morning radio show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson