Broe v. Reed: Motion for Expedited Discovery, Subpoenas (Obama's Washington case)

The Right Side of Life ^ | 12/16/08 | James Broe

[BP2]

Broe v. Reed: Motion for Expedited Discovery, Subpoenas December 16th, 2008

Yesterday, DecaLogosIntl.org reported that James Broe, one of 13 Plaintiffs in Broe v. Reed, has filed a motion for expedited discovery and authority to issue subpoenas in Washington State Supreme Court:

http://decalogosintl.org/documents/motion_to_expedite_discovery.pdf

Names and Designation of Persons Filing Motion

COMES NOW, James E. Broe, Kenneth R. Seal, Robert Baker, Mark Sussman, Stan Walter, Bill Wise, Andy Stevens, Ed Crawford, Jason Lagen, Louise Workman, Jocelyn Murcelli, Mike Murcelli and Kevin McDowell, by and through counsel of record Stephen Pidgeon, pursuant to RAP 17.3(a), the Rules of Discovery, CR 26-37, and CR 45 governing the issuance of subpoenas, and Move this Honorable Court for an order allowing the issuance of two subpoenas for the purpose of obtaining admissible evidence in this case, and expediting discovery pursuant to the proposed schedule.

Relief Requested

Plaintiffs seek an Order allowing plaintiffs expedited discovery by means of two subpoenas, one to be served on the Secretary of State of the State of Washington, to discover the following items: I) the Declaration of Candidacy of Barack Obama as filed in the State of Washington; 2) all records concerning the candidacy and disallowance of Socialist Worker’s Party candidate Frank Colero within the Secretary of State’s office; and one to be served upon the Director of the Department of Health in the State of Hawaii, to discover the following items: 3) the Birth Certificate of Barack Obama in Hawaii, and 4) all supporting documentation regarding the registration of the birth of Barack Obama in Hawaii. Plaintiffs seek an order which establishes the following schedule.

Plaintiffs are to serve the Secretary of State of the State of Washington with a Subpoena in the form attached hereto as approved by the Court no later than the close of business on Friday, December 19, 2008, and responses shall be served upon Plaintiffs’ counsel Stephen Pidgeon no later than the close of business on December 28, 2008.

Plaintiffs are to serve the State of Hawaii Department of Health with a Subpoena in the form attached hereto as approved by the Court no later than the close of business on Monday, December 22, 2008, and responses shall be served upon Plaintiffs’ ‘counsel. no later than the close of business on December 28, 2008.

[HighlyOpinionated]

Hey, SeaHawkFan,

Please complete your “about” page here at FR with some background info on yourself and your interests.

Thanks.

And anyone else who has a blank page, please consider writing a line or two about yourself. Pictures of your hobbies, etc, are good too.

[real_patriotic_american]

I believe that there is a similar case to this in California as well.

http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244

[Red Steel]

Plaintiffs are to serve the State of Hawaii Department of Health with a Subpoena in the form attached hereto as approved by the Court no later than the close of business on Monday, December 22, 2008, and responses shall be served upon Plaintiffs’ ‘counsel. no later than the close of business on December 28, 2008.

This it for Obama.

Obama has been recently hobnobbing with influential people in Hawaii in the first week of this month. He will be in Hawaii for Christmas starting on the 22nd Dec. He's shopping around for help. Obama needs an expertly made long form birth certificate.

Under the premise that Obama is screwed. Obama goes for it by throwing millions of dollars in leftover campaign funds to get the best help, a forger. The forger will need a blank form of the BC long form circa 1961. He'll have to find a doctor or mid-wife signature and a doctor or mid-wife to vouch for it.. so they'll likely forge the signature of a dead one. The mid-wife would be easier for the forger to do. No hospital to deal with. He'll need an old typewriter. After Obama's forger has a grade A forged BC, he will have to replace it with the real one locked away. A switch operation. The easiest way is to bribe the people who have access to his real long form BC to do the switch with the bogus document, and to change the related computer database to reflect the bogus BC information. Mission Impossible? ;-)

The question is will Obama pull it off, or will he even attempt it? Or is Obama in Hawaii only for the sunshine? Or is Obama secretly in love with Governor Linda Lingle? LoL!

[SeaHawkFan]

He'll need an old typewriter.

That won't be hard. Finding a ribbon and paper from that long ago would be the real problem.

[FreeAtlanta]

For the longest, I wondered why it simply wasn't replaced or created by a forgery. Maybe, Obama and the various people involved are afraid they will be found out? With the media flying cover, I don't know why they would care if they were found out. The worthless "journalist" would just ignore the story.

Well, often, the coverup becomes worse than the actual crime (See, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton's blue dress). Hopefully, all this will cripple any far left-wing agenda that the Democrats-corrupt jerks- have.

[Red Steel]

Hopefully, all this will cripple any far left-wing agenda that the Democrats-corrupt jerks- have.

Yes, I predict if Obama survives his BC fiasco, he'll still have so many scandals flying around his head his communist agenda will suffer retardation.

[Frantzie]

Woo Hoo! “Don’t taze me bro!” Good news and more patriots not giving up. :-)

Leo liked Steve Pidgeon’s case but the problem may be WA state’s corruption. :-(

Best of luck to you and let us know if we can help. I have endless admiration for Leo, Cort, Orly, Pidgeon and others with the courage to stand up to the coup.

I read today in the WSJ that SCOTUS voted to allow a case of Gitmo terrorists that were subjected to harsh words. My guess is their pizzas at gitmo were not at the right temperature or the thread counts in the sheets were less than 700.

It seems like SCOTUS is more concerned with terrorists rights than citizens rights and the Constitution. I still have some faith in Scalia, thomas, Roberts and Alito.

[BP2]

ping

Ok ...

... so Andy Martin files before the election on Oct. 18 (not his first motion, but his second motion):
http://contrariancommentary.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/andy-martin-hawaii-lawsuit-2-emergency-motion/

Then Obama goes to Hawaii, presumably to visit Toot on Oct. 24:
http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081024/NEWS05/810240360

Then Hawaii judge “conducts vigorous hearing on Obama birth certificate battle, reserves ruling” on Andy’s second filing, not closing it (takes it “under advisement) in mid-Nov:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2134526/posts

About the same time in mid-Nov, Toots has a funeral service, which Obama doesn’t attend: http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Nov15/0,4670,ObamaGrandmother,00.html

Since then, Pidgeon’s case is accepted, and files emergency discovery: http://decalogosintl.org/documents/motion_to_expedite_discovery.pdf

Obama plans to celebrate Christmas in Hawaii, there on Dec. 22

The Washington Supreme Court hears oral arguments on Jan 8, the same day Congress meets to count the Electoral votes.

... dots for those who wish to connect them...

[sionnsar]

Thanks to truth49 for the ping.

Say WA? Evergreen State ping

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.

Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.

[STARWISE]

~~PING!

[Jack Black]

Hey, SeaHawkFan, Please complete your “about” page here at FR with some background info on yourself and your interests. Thanks. And anyone else who has a blank page, please consider writing a line or two about yourself. Pictures of your hobbies, etc, are good too.

Or, just copy the the Civil War II ping list and Gadsen's Flag picture off mine. It looks like we may need both soon!

[Jack Black]

I’m sorry I never could connect those dot puzzles. Can you spell it out for me? These state courts are coordinating? Obama is taking a suitcase full of cash to Hawaii to buy the judge? The race will be final before the first hearing is held?

The SC wiffed on this, right? What happene to Berg - dismissed, remanded back? What about the one that was last Friday. Did they dump it yesterday.

Someone needs to build a chart on the web with these.

[Faith]

I’m sorry I never could connect those dot puzzles. Can you spell it out for me?

I'm with you, Jack. Please help us understand, BP2, and anyone else having a reasoned analysis. I'd love to read your theories about these actions.

[hoosiermama]

Prayers for you.

[seekthetruth]

What Great News!!

Heard about this last night and wanted the details. Thanks for the details!

I believe there is more news to come that will begin to bring the truth to light!

[SeaHawkFan]

The Washington Supreme Court hears oral arguments on Jan 8, the same day Congress meets to count the Electoral votes.

Who said the WA SC is going to hear oral arguments on this case? En Banc does not necessarily mean there will be oral arguments.

[SeaHawkFan]

The Washington Supreme Court hears oral arguments on Jan 8, the same day Congress meets to count the Electoral votes.

I just called the WASC. There is an administrative conference on Januray 8 to consider the case. There will be no oral arguments on that date.

Because it is petition for a writ on mandamus against Reed, the WASC is required to issue a written decision addressing the law and the facts. On the other hand, just because the WA constitution requires that they issue a written opinion addressing the facts and the law does not mean they will actually do it.

[penelopesire]

This is promising! Continuing prayers for our country.

[BP2]

Thanks for the clarification on that, SeaHawkFan.

Myself and others are trying to help them where we can. The biggest concern is the discovery phase. But I think Steve’s got it covered — he’s coordinating with other attorneys on other cases in other states...

[4woodenboats]

I think some of our local members took down their "about" pages any facts that could ID them when we realized members of the press were investigating and printing our names, jobs, and where we lived, none of which was posted in the instance I'm thinking of (not me).

They don't just call this a Soviet Socialist state just because of the oversized, original statue of Lenin or the observance of atheism as a recognized religion, ya know.