ping
Ok ...
... so Andy Martin files before the election on Oct. 18 (not his first motion, but his second motion):
http://contrariancommentary.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/andy-martin-hawaii-lawsuit-2-emergency-motion/
Then Obama goes to Hawaii, presumably to visit Toot on Oct. 24:
http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081024/NEWS05/810240360
Then Hawaii judge “conducts vigorous hearing on Obama birth certificate battle, reserves ruling” on Andy’s second filing, not closing it (takes it “under advisement) in mid-Nov:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2134526/posts
About the same time in mid-Nov, Toots has a funeral service, which Obama doesn’t attend: http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Nov15/0,4670,ObamaGrandmother,00.html
Since then, Pidgeon’s case is accepted, and files emergency discovery: http://decalogosintl.org/documents/motion_to_expedite_discovery.pdf
Obama plans to celebrate Christmas in Hawaii, there on Dec. 22
The Washington Supreme Court hears oral arguments on Jan 8, the same day Congress meets to count the Electoral votes.
... dots for those who wish to connect them...
I’m sorry I never could connect those dot puzzles. Can you spell it out for me? These state courts are coordinating? Obama is taking a suitcase full of cash to Hawaii to buy the judge? The race will be final before the first hearing is held?
The SC wiffed on this, right? What happene to Berg - dismissed, remanded back? What about the one that was last Friday. Did they dump it yesterday.
Someone needs to build a chart on the web with these.
Who said the WA SC is going to hear oral arguments on this case? En Banc does not necessarily mean there will be oral arguments.
I just called the WASC. There is an administrative conference on Januray 8 to consider the case. There will be no oral arguments on that date.
Because it is petition for a writ on mandamus against Reed, the WASC is required to issue a written decision addressing the law and the facts. On the other hand, just because the WA constitution requires that they issue a written opinion addressing the facts and the law does not mean they will actually do it.