Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VeniVidiVici
"Wrongly rejected absentee ballots" means they've already made a judgment on them.

Is this an all-Democrat or mostly-Democrat court? I think someone said here the other day that they were all Democrats. In that case, they'll find for Frnaken, and the Supreme Court of the US may not see any reason to get involved.

If Franken can get within 133 votes, he's probably home free, since there is the precinct with the 133 ballots which may have been run through the machine twice. The additional 133 voters may not exist, but their votes will be added to Franken's total.

Are any of the RINO senators likely to jump ship if the Democrats get to 59...or will they just vote with the Democrats when it counts?

5 posted on 12/15/2008 3:23:08 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus
I think the board also decided to count the missing 133 votes when they decided to revisit the rejected absentee ballots.

-PJ

11 posted on 12/15/2008 3:38:30 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus

Judges in Minnesota are elected based on non-partisan elections which occur every six years. If someone vacates the position before the six year term is up, the governor appoints a replacement.

Four of the seven justices were appointed by Tim Pawlenty.

One was appointed by Arne Carlson.

One was appointed by Jesse Ventura.

One (HoF NFL defensive tackle) Alan Page won an election outright on his own and was never appointed.


16 posted on 12/15/2008 3:48:29 PM PST by Sam Spade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus

Did the court say the absentee ballots were “wrongly rejected”, or was that just the AP article that characterized them that way?


21 posted on 12/15/2008 4:05:42 PM PST by Purrcival (Obama and Biden: The Marx Brothers! (Thanks FReeper Enduring Freedom for the tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus
The additional 133 voters may not exist, but their votes will be added to Franken's total.

I believe that among the 133 votes Franken had a 46-vote margin, so the net gain would be a lot less than 133.

23 posted on 12/15/2008 4:12:47 PM PST by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus
........since there is the precinct with the 133 ballots which may have been run through the machine twice. The additional 133 voters may not exist, but their votes will be added to Franken's total.

Is it possible to do this ? I did not even think of that possibility.

26 posted on 12/15/2008 4:59:11 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus
Are any of the RINO senators likely to jump ship if the Democrats get to 59...or will they just vote with the Democrats when it counts?
McCain?
44 posted on 12/15/2008 7:21:41 PM PST by TV Dinners (Hope is not a Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus

No, they have much more power by threatening to vote with the Dems if we don’t bow to their demands.

That means Snowe, Collins, and Spectre will be controlling our agenda.

Ugh, wake me up in 2 years.


48 posted on 12/15/2008 8:33:21 PM PST by Identity on Free Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus
Exactly! Minnesota SC leans left and Pawlenty is a RINO.
52 posted on 12/15/2008 10:43:13 PM PST by tomymind (McCain is my President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson