Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Op-Ed: Sutter County must address rising pension debt problem
Appeal-Democrat ^ | 12/14/8 | Pat Miller

Posted on 12/15/2008 2:31:30 PM PST by SmithL

Sutter County pension costs continue to go up millions of dollars each year, requiring more and more of our tax dollars to be spent for employee benefits and on servicing the pension debt thus reducing services to the citizens of Sutter County. If changes are not made, the pension debt will eventually consume most of the county's budget. The latest report from the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) released in October states that Sutter County owes CalPERS $44.8 million as of June 30, 2007.

In just six years, from June 2001 to June 2007, Sutter County went from $28.8 million in the black to $44.8 million in the red — a minus $73.6 million. The increase in costs can be attributed to two factors: 1) decreases in CalPERS investment returns and 2) the 2004 formula increase from 2 percent at 55 to 2.7 percent at 55 passed by the Sutter County Board of Supervisors without a financial analysis and without public discussion. Current stock market losses, which have not been factored into future payments, are certain to increase the county's contribution rate substantially in years to come. The increase in future payments will not be realized until 2011-2012 because CalPERS calculates payments using 2-year-old information and "smooths" increases in contribution rates over a 15-year period.

We are now paying 24.5 percent of each miscellaneous employee's salary and 31.9 percent for safety employees to CalPERS. That includes the employees' share of the pension cost which the county pays — 8 percent for miscellaneous and 9 percent for safety. Employee salaries and benefits are 34.8 percent of the county's 2008-2009 budget and getting larger each year —along with the county's debt to CalPERS. Next year the percentages will rise to 24.75 percent for miscellaneous and 33.3 percent for safety employees.

County officials have repeatedly stated that Sutter County is in "excellent financial shape" and has $30 million to $40 million in reserves. It is quite evident that we now owe more than we have in the bank. This year we are paying $2,851,074 on that $36.8 million debt which includes over $2.6 million annually in interest at CalPERS' 7.75 percent interest rate. Next year the interest alone will cost us more than $3.1 million.

Sutter County pensions are excessive on their face, giving employees with 30 years service 81 percent of their last year's salary. On top of their county pension, they will collect Social Security benefits, giving some county retirees more than when they were working. To be clear, the current pension formula cannot be changed for existing employees unless they agree to the change or the county undergoes reorganization under bankruptcy laws. Action needs to be taken now to bring our pension costs under control. To that end, the Sutter County Taxpayers Association recommends:

1. Change the formula for new employees to 2 percent at age 60+ or aligned with Social Security retirement.

2. Base retirement pay on the more typical three-year average instead of the current last year salary. People are living longer, are healthier and many routinely choose to work into their 70s.

3. Have employees pay their 8 percent or 9 percent share. State employees pay a share into their retirement accounts, the vast majority of the private sector pay into their own retirement; county employees should too.

4. Require a vote of the people for any county pension increases. Orange County voters just passed a local measure with a 75 percent majority to require that any increase in county pensions first has to have an actuarial report of expected future costs and be approved by the voters.

Please contact your county supervisors and urge them to act now to address the problem before the county ends up cutting essential services to pay these padded pensions that are absolutely unheard of in the private sector, and that drain the pocketbooks of Sutter's citizens.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: goldenstate; pensiondebt; yourtaxdollarsatwork
Pat Miller is president of the Sutter County Taxpayers Association.
1 posted on 12/15/2008 2:31:31 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

And this is different than Social Security how?


2 posted on 12/15/2008 2:34:35 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (SARAH *** JOE *** 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Madoff was a piker when it came to Ponzis.


3 posted on 12/15/2008 2:37:12 PM PST by Travis McGee (--www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
If changes are not made, the pension debt will eventually consume most of the county's budget

No big surprise to anyone who is following this. 90% of the counties will be facing this in the next 10 years.

Add into that teachers retirements, 100% of all counties (or state) in the Untied States will have to increase taxes at least 50% just for retired public employees.

What Colorado has done, and it's probably the model followed in the rest of the states, is when they had a big surplus in the State Employees Retirement Pension plan, rather than let it 'go to waste' they made huge increases in the retirement benefits.

Auto workers bailout? PEANUTS. This is going to dwarf anything we've seen so far.

Fortunately, this can easily be solved by raising taxes, and thus fueling the economy.

4 posted on 12/15/2008 2:38:00 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction;, one of the five top worries of the American farmer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Public employee pensions are killing CA. Slowly people are waking up to that fact. Until they are brought in line with the private sector, no CA gov’t can hope to be fiscally responsible.


5 posted on 12/15/2008 2:38:21 PM PST by Lou Budvis ("I did not have sex with that woman..." = "I did not have contact with the governor..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The best paid employees in my little Gulf coast county are county employees. Without a lawsuit to challenge a court order based on the voting rights act, nothing will change.


6 posted on 12/15/2008 2:38:42 PM PST by Jacquerie (More Central Planning is not the solution to the failure of Central Planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
This is the socialism that the voters want. The county pays retirements with money it doesn't have, resulting in a downward spiraling debt. Services are continued for illegal aliens but curtailed for the taxpayer, e.g., police, fire districts and public maintenance are the first to go (missed by the taxpayer;) welfare benefits, schooling and health care are continued for the illegal alien.

Pulling the illegals from the equation, the normal working stiff will suffer from the curtailed public services while the government employee is generously pensioned, even if living elsewhere.

7 posted on 12/15/2008 2:51:13 PM PST by Thommas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Fortunately, this can easily be solved by raising taxes, and thus fueling the economy.

Hahahahaha! Nice touch.

8 posted on 12/15/2008 2:53:53 PM PST by Thommas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
I suppose it's no coincidence that Yuba City is by tradition ranked dead last year after year in all those places-rated books.

The town is pretty much a strip mall with homes built on the circumference. Nice view of the Sutter Buttes though.

9 posted on 12/15/2008 2:57:51 PM PST by Flycatcher (Strong copy for a strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

BUMP!


10 posted on 12/15/2008 3:02:38 PM PST by Publius6961 (Change is not a plan; Hope is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Thommas

Hehe. Thanks, I was hoping someone would get it.


11 posted on 12/15/2008 4:28:31 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction;, one of the five top worries of the American farmer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Because it's a "Defined Benefit" plan which can only be changed if the employee agrees in writing beforehand, or if the County files bankruptcy.

That's a damned big difference.

L

12 posted on 12/15/2008 8:11:32 PM PST by Lurker ("America is at that awkward stage. " Claire Wolfe, call your office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
I know what you mean.....people squawk at the UAW but compared to what the teachers and police and various govt class employees get, the UAW is getting peanuts.....

don't some of these govt people realize that we can't exist as a country if so many of them are getting so much?.....it just can not go on.....its impossible...

13 posted on 12/16/2008 3:09:07 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson