Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Opinion: A Memo to the UAW from the Taxpayer
TheStreet.com ^ | 15 December 2008 | Dan Fitzpatrick

Posted on 12/15/2008 12:54:51 PM PST by The Pack Knight

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Couldn't say it better myself. Collective bargaining agreements are private contracts, and so are the rights and obligations that arise from them. The Auto Workers have a right to everything they bargained for - but only the party they bargained with is obligated to fulfill those rights. Last I checked, the taxpayers never agreed to be a surety for either party.

It's a shame if the retired auto workers don't get all of their pensions, but it simply is not our problem. If GM and the others can't pay, then they can't pay. Most of us don't get pensions and never will, and it isn't right that we be asked to pay for theirs.

1 posted on 12/15/2008 12:54:54 PM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
First, we want to make it clear that we do not consider you overpaid or lazy.

Well...speak for yourself. I think the UAW workers are overpaid and the fact that Ford lost $9 billion while Toyota made $4 billion suggests the same conclusion. You guys made your bed, you go right ahead and sleep in it. Just don't ask me for a financial blanket to cover up both yours and managements' excesses.

2 posted on 12/15/2008 1:01:25 PM PST by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

I wonder if the UAW will reply.


3 posted on 12/15/2008 1:02:02 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
"First, we want to make it clear that we do not consider you overpaid or lazy."

Speak for yourself. I wholeheartedly consider these union members to be both overpaid and in many cases lazy. I will not voluntarily subsidize said pay, benefits and retirement when 98% of us taxpayers have nothing resembling it.

4 posted on 12/15/2008 1:02:21 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Barack Obama: In Error and arrogant -- he's errogant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

bump


5 posted on 12/15/2008 1:03:02 PM PST by Sans-Culotte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

The steel industry went through this.


6 posted on 12/15/2008 1:03:15 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
We'll probably wind up bailing you out because we know that tens of millions of dollars went into the last election cycle, and favors need to be repaid by our newly elected representatives. We get that. We don't like it, but we get it.

...and President Bush is determined to make that "probably wind up bailing you out" a definite...

7 posted on 12/15/2008 1:05:04 PM PST by meandog (Wasilla warrior in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

It is not my problem as the taxpayer. I never was part of the contract. Bankruptcy is the best solution. A taxpayer bailout without fixing their costs structure is a band aid on a terminal cancer patient.

the cold hard fact is there are too many cars built globally and too few customers. The situation is worse due to a global economic slowdown. Cars from China and India will only make it worse. Argentina got automakers to sell cars there at cost. Argentina is a socialist/kleptocracy along the lines of Chicago and the new Obama admin.


8 posted on 12/15/2008 1:06:36 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

I second that emotion. Being in the logistics and transportation business, we would never schedule a delivery after 12PM because we knew we would have to wait until the next shift because the previous one would have met their quota of 7. (Compare that to a Honda plant- 40+ per shift)

It is about the economy, stupid!
Nuclear Winter In Shipping

The Wall Street Journal is reporting Freight Haulers Slam on the Brakes.

Expecting the Weakest Year in Three Decades, Truck, Rail and Ocean Shipping Firms Are Cutting Back. In a normal year, Gordon Trucking Inc. might replace 20% of its fleet of 1,500 big rigs with new trucks. But given the bleak outlook for the freight business, the Pacific, Wash., hauler doesn’t intend to buy a single new truck next year.

“We’re settling in for nuclear winter in the first half of 2009,” says Steve Gordon, operating chief for the company, which hauls everything from paper products to electronics.

He’s not alone. Some industry executives and analysts predict that 2009 could be the worst year for freight-transportation volume in three decades or more. ….

(Should I get a bailout?)


9 posted on 12/15/2008 1:07:56 PM PST by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: econjack

I agree, though I think the point is it isn’t for us to say who is “overpaid” or “underpaid.” They’re being paid exactly what they contracted for. The fact that they’re being paid so much that their employers are uncompetitive and unprofitable is between, well, them and their employers.

Also, I’ll note the common union argument that the $73/hour figure includes “legacy costs” beyond their base wages. No one forced them to demand hire-to-grave pensions and benefits; it’s all compensation that the union bargained for. It makes no difference whether that compensation is paid entirely through a paycheck or partially through a pension plan; it still comes out of the employer’s labor expenses.


10 posted on 12/15/2008 1:08:36 PM PST by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
Time for a new career ~ after spending 38 years working in an industry where every single American citizen above the age of 5 thinks they OWN your employer, and that THEY are your boss, it's pretty clear my advice is going to be needed at General Motors, Chrysler and Ford (if they take the money), and definitely among the members of the UAW.

Just about any postal employee (former or present) can tell you all about the problem, but they'll also tell you that all you need to do is make sure you don't have any "uniform" parts on you or in your car, and just keep your mouth shut.

Alas, I worked mostly in organizational elements over the years where it was necessary to deal WITH the public on this very issue

Not revealing any secrets here, but guarantee UAW members and other Big Three employees are heading into a time of their lives where they will grow to despise all the busy bodies who want to tell them how to run THEIR business with THEIR money, and why YOU should fix their car for free, and, BTW, give 'em a big refund!

11 posted on 12/15/2008 1:08:42 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

Put 50 billion into unemployment benefits for everyone getting laid off and let the auto industry figure out how to get back in the game on their own.


12 posted on 12/15/2008 1:09:04 PM PST by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

FTA “we do not consider you overpaid...”.

Oh yes I do. The unions killed their own golden goose through decades of greedy union contracts, getting unreasonable benefits and pay.

We have(now HAD) a GM plant in Janesville,WI. Any friends I had in school who had parents with a job at GM (1970s +1980’s) had it made.

Of course they worked hard, but they were well compensated. They made more per hour than most could dream of making.

The unions broke the US Auto Industry making greedy pay and benefits demands. Also add in blame with the gov’t, for demanding they make cars to the gov’t whims and enviro-wacko ideas that made producing the cars at a good price impossible.


13 posted on 12/15/2008 1:10:15 PM PST by TheConservativeParty ("A ship in harbor is safe, but that is not why the ship was built." by The First Gal of AK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Sure did. I’ll direct you to one of my favorite companies, Nucor. Their entire workforce is non-union, and their workers are primarily compensated through performance incentives. Also, they only have two levels of management between the CEO and the floor workers at the mills. They’ve been profitable for 40+ years straight in an industry in which common knowledge says Americans can’t compete with the Japanese and Chinese.

This is the sort of 21st century business plan the auto industry needs to look at.


14 posted on 12/15/2008 1:11:37 PM PST by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Shhhhh, don’t mention Argentina!
They funded their auto ‘bailout’ by seizing 401Ks! To appease the 401K owners, they made the auto companies produce 2 models to be sold at cost and funded from the 401Ks!


15 posted on 12/15/2008 1:12:17 PM PST by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

***It’s a shame if the retired auto workers don’t get all of their pensions, but it simply is not our problem.**

They should do like I did when I retired. Take the cash payout and invest it in Bernard Madoff’s hedge fund! I’ll make zillions!

Oh, wait...;-)


16 posted on 12/15/2008 1:12:17 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (NEVER FORGET TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
when the chips are down. It is time for you to jump in, be patriotic

This essay expresses my thoughts exactly. I do want to emphasis one point.

The UAW along with the bailout proponents say "IT MUST BE DONE TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COUNTRY"

OK, then I say "IF THE UAW REFUSES CONCESSIONS, THEN I SAY YOU ARE TRAITORS TO THE USA"

I own 3 gm cars and I bought a new gm car in August during the employee discount promotion. I now consider the UAW traitiors and AS GOD AS MY WITNESS, I WILL NEVER BUY ANOTHER UAW CAR OR ANYTHING ELSE AS LONG AS I LIVE.

I WILL NOT SUPPORT TRAITORS.

17 posted on 12/15/2008 1:12:48 PM PST by staytrue (YES WE CAN, (everyone should get in the practice of saying it, it will soon be manditory))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeParty

If only the unions didn’t hate the companies they work for so much. It’s gonna take years to undo this mentality! ‘Hate’ is such an effective weapon!


18 posted on 12/15/2008 1:14:55 PM PST by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dixie Yooper

Neither the government or the worker pays for regular Unemployment Insurance (U.I.) it is paid for by a tax on employers: http://workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/unemploy/uifactsheet.asp

U.I. for Federal workers, ex-military and extensions is paid for by the government, however.


19 posted on 12/15/2008 1:16:31 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Barack Obama: In Error and arrogant -- he's errogant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

You should send that to every state and federal senator, representative, mid-level government cronie, and any other
relevant party with an e-mail address you can find.

Twice.


20 posted on 12/15/2008 1:18:43 PM PST by ronnyquest ("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson