Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No More Bailouts [Bachmann]
RedState via The Hill Blog ^ | 2008-12-08 | Michele Bachmann

Posted on 12/12/2008 10:12:06 PM PST by rabscuttle385

It’s official. Washington’s favorite word this year is “bailout.” It’s been overused by Congress’ elite in hopes of rescuing their corporate friends from poor decision-making. It’s been used to pick the pockets of the already hurting taxpayer. It’s become a euphemism for robbing Peter to pay Paul.

The last thing a struggling, hard-working family needs is another Washington bailout which forces them further into debt and financial turmoil – especially during these tough times.

Past bailouts have thus far failed. Whether it was Bear Stearns or the larger Wall Street bailout, these government handouts have not done what they promised. There’s no stability in the marketplace. The Dow continues to plummet or yo-yo, at best. The only goals the bailouts have actually accomplished are to anger the American people and leave them — and their children — to foot a massive bill.

Next week, the Democrat-controlled Congress is expected to call Members back to Washington, with President-Elect Obama’s blessing, to consider a second auto industry bailout. Yes, that’s right, a second one.

In September, Congress passed legislation that established a $25-billion loan program for the automotive industry. And, last month, Detroit automakers jetted back to Washington, asking for another $25 billion. A couple weeks later, the Big Three revised their proposal and are now seeking $34 billion — much of it they say they’ll need by the end of the year. Didn’t their mothers teach them to finish what’s on their plates before asking for seconds?

There’s little doubt that the American auto industry is in trouble. But, the Democrat-controlled Congress appears hellbent on a bailout. They’re reluctant to entertain all the potential reorganization options that may include short-term hardships but long-term, broad-based benefits. In fact, Speaker Pelosi stated that Chapter 11 bankruptcy – a form of bankruptcy that allows a corporation to reorganize their business without killing the company –is off the table.

Some have argued that the auto industry should be drawing on the money from the initial auto bailout instead of siphoning off additional money from the massive Wall Street bailout. In fact, the Administration and a bipartisan group of Senators has discussed restructuring those loans to be more helpful under the current circumstances. But, this commonsense approach gets little notice by Congressional leadership.

I understand that our nation’s auto companies are hurting and that times are tough for many of its employees. But what these companies need are restructuring not bailouts.

The Big Three must readjust their product plans to create vehicles that Americans want to buy. The issue isn’t that individuals are not purchasing cars; it’s that they are not purchasing American cars. Foreign companies are unveiling vehicles that Americans want to buy. They’re using technology and marketing that works. And because American auto dealers costs are so much higher- an estimated $2000 more per car- their competitors are able to put in more extras without pricing their products out of the market.

In addition, a wholesale reorganization of management practices is essential to keeping Detroit automakers alive. Take General Motors for example, GM is drowning under the high costs of employee benefits. Due to the negotiation of long-term retirement and health packages, GM currently supports more retired employees than present employees. Taking care of your retirees is good, but not to the point where it’s forcing you into a hole. The former head of the UAW, Walter Reuther, once said it best: “Getting more and more pay for less and less work is a dead-end street.”

As Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez recently said on CNN, “There’s a line of companies of industries waiting at Treasury just to see if they can get their hands on those $700 billion.” If we use those funds for the automakers now, will troubled mortgage holders ever see any help? To add insult to injury, Congressional Democrats are reportedly working on a plan to send a $500 billion stimulus plan to the Obama White House on Inauguration Day. Clearly, they haven’t learned from their mistakes.

I opposed the massive Wall Street bailout package in October because I didn’t think it was the right remedy for what ails our economy, and I supported serious and fundamental reforms in its place.

Washington needs to stop handing out your money like its Monopoly money. Each dollar is hard-earned and the men and woman who worked so hard for it deserve more respect from their government than to be treated like an ATM. Our economy grew strong on the backs of Main Street; from the ideas and sheer sweat of innovators and entrepreneurs flush with the American spirit. Risk-taking is part of that adventure. But when government guarantees against failure, risk and reward becomes meaningless. Eventually, that will crush our economy- and that eventually may not be that far down the road.

President-Elect Barack Obama recently noted in an interview on 60 Minutes that “we shouldn’t worry about the deficit next year or even the year after,” but I am concerned that it is precisely that type of lax attitude that will pull the taxpayers and the economy into far deeper economic problems. Future bailouts and more debt will break the backs of American taxpayers this is something that our nation cannot afford.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: 110th; bailout; bailoutnation; financialcrisis; michelebachmann; mn; panicof2008

1 posted on 12/12/2008 10:12:07 PM PST by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PAR35; TigerLikesRooster; bamahead; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; MadLibDisease; ...
*Ping!*
2 posted on 12/12/2008 10:12:43 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Money, Banking, and Financial Markets Ping List.

"Money, not morality, is the principle commerce of civilized nations."
—Thomas Jefferson

FR Keywords: moneylist, bankinglist, financelist

Please tag all relevant threads with the aforementioned keywords.

This can be a very high-volume ping list at times.

Ping list jointly pinged by rabscuttle385 and TigerLikesRooster.

To join the ping list:
FReepmail rabscuttle385 with the subject line add  moneylist.
(Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop moneylist.)


3 posted on 12/12/2008 10:12:59 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Amusing seeing the sheeple go ballistic over a 25 billion dollar auto bailout while ignoring the trillions in bailout money for banks and Wall St firms


4 posted on 12/12/2008 10:18:40 PM PST by dennisw (Never bet on Islam! ::::: Never bet on a false prophet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

It was also very nice of the entire national RNC to turn their back on Rep. Bachmann during the last two months of the ‘08 election cycle-not! Conservatives, at every political level, still seriously need to find a stable and reliable “entity” that really, successfully helps all conservative causes forever!


5 posted on 12/12/2008 10:19:27 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore (Conservatives obey the rules. Leftists cheat. Who probably has the political advantage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore; Eric Blair 2084
It was also very nice of the entire national RNC to turn their back on Rep. Bachmann during the last two months of the ‘08 election cycle-not!

Actually, another Freeper told me about her in the late stages of the election cycle, and I liked her so much that I sent a nice campaign contribution.

6 posted on 12/12/2008 10:20:53 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

This amounts to a downpayment.


7 posted on 12/12/2008 10:35:49 PM PST by RobbyS (ECCE homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

TRILLIONS for Wall St. Keep your eye on the ball


8 posted on 12/12/2008 10:39:28 PM PST by dennisw (Never bet on Islam! ::::: Never bet on a false prophet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; johnthebaptistmoore; dennisw

Bachmann railed against the TARP bailout. Then she went on Chrissy Matthews and he attempted to bait her into saying 0 was un-American. Instead she railed on leftists in Congress as being un-American.

Two days later, Colin Powell took her on in his post-interview endorsement of 0. Next day, she had pubbie opposition as a write-in via money from Pelosi’s PAC and another $2 million dropped on her RAT challenger.

Bachmann still won.

Seats held by true (social & fiscal) female conservatives are the latest strike ground for RATS. Bachmann won this round, but they will likely come back for her again just like they do any black Republican who runs for anything so much as dog-catcher.


9 posted on 12/12/2008 10:55:58 PM PST by AmericanGirlRising (The cow is in the ditch. We know how it got there. Now help me get it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
Conservatives, at every political level, still seriously need to find a stable and reliable “entity” that really, successfully helps all conservative causes forever! I've been thinking that we conservatives on the net should have an alternative ready in case rinos and moderates continue to cling to power in the GOP. I know we are the majority and it is our money that supports these fools. Why not have a separate entity ready to support our candidates, from primaries to election day. I think the resources are there to track potential candidates at all levels of government, something the GOP should be doing anyway. Bachmann is an example of a candidate we should support through thick and thin.
10 posted on 12/12/2008 11:09:26 PM PST by ABQHispConservative (Liberal + Democrat = Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ABQHispConservative

There are a few doing what you want now. PrivMail me if interested.


11 posted on 12/13/2008 12:15:32 AM PST by AmericanGirlRising (The cow is in the ditch. We know how it got there. Now help me get it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AmericanGirlRising

Ms Bachmann is a Heroine and the reactions of the Left and Colin Powell/RNC Rinos after she called out the commie infested US House was very enlightening. We few must try to connect with these stalwarts like Michelle B!


12 posted on 12/13/2008 4:02:18 AM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Fabulous image. Hope you don’t mind me stealing it.


13 posted on 12/13/2008 4:55:29 AM PST by slnk_rules (http://mises.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slnk_rules
Do the math. GM is losing 2 Billion a month. This and health care will bring down the Democrats. Scott Rasmussen’s poll show most people are livid over the 14 billion bailout. Only 24% support universal health care. 2010 will be a great year for “ real GOP”
14 posted on 12/13/2008 5:02:46 AM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa
We need more of Michelle and another to watch is Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin), another conservative with a "Roadmap for America" proposal:

Rep. Ryan proposal

15 posted on 12/13/2008 5:30:44 AM PST by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

I am so in love with that woman. And I love pulling the chains of the lefties around here who hate her because she’s a (gasp!) mom, foster mom, Christian, private business owner, fiscal conservative and a champion of the taxpayers.


16 posted on 12/13/2008 7:08:13 AM PST by MNnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ABQHispConservative; johnthebaptistmoore
I know we are the majority and it is our money that supports these fools. Why not have a separate entity ready to support our candidates, from primaries to election day.

FWIW, I found one PAC started by Jim DeMint. None of the money goes to the GOP party.

senateconservatives.com

I haven't found one for House candidates yet. Please let me know if you do.

17 posted on 12/13/2008 10:02:45 AM PST by wmfights (If you want change support Senateconservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson