Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/12/2008 9:18:49 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ckilmer

Born? I think he was hatched.


2 posted on 12/12/2008 9:26:17 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Drill Here. Drill Now. Pay Less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer
Dear SCOTUS,

Does or does not the Constitution protect our Democratic Republic against a foreign leader visiting the United States, having sex with a teenage American girl, conceiving a child, indoctrinating that child with an anti-American world view for 35 years, and then running that child as a candidate for POTUS to usurp the leadership of the nation? Yes? Great! I thought so. Thank you for removing ineligible candidate(s) from the election.

--Concerned Citizen
3 posted on 12/12/2008 9:31:23 PM PST by so_real
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

ping for later


4 posted on 12/12/2008 9:35:03 PM PST by genxer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

Are you referring to the scandal-plagued Obama administration-elect?...

Remember when Bill Clinton was first elected? His buddy was president of the cable network CNN, and forbid CNN employees from mentioning the word “scandal” when referring to the so-called president Clinton.

We’re obviously seeing the same sort of self-censorship happening in the media yet again.


8 posted on 12/12/2008 9:44:45 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("Free Trade" = Fire Americans. Buy another company then fire more Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

Excellent article.

Lets see what happens come monday.

Lets see if the laws of the Constitution start to be tossed aside for sake of convenience.


12 posted on 12/12/2008 9:57:29 PM PST by Eye of Unk (Americans should lead America, its the right way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer
As posted on other threads discussing this issue:

Something to consider in the discussion on 'natural born citizen':

The term “natural born citizen” has NEVER been defined in the U.S. Constitution or in codified U.S. law.

The OPERATIVE phrase of the 14th Amendment expressly states:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside ...”

It says “citizens” NOT “natural born citizens”.

In situations like this, SCOTUS has USUALLY devolved to ascertain what the “original intent” of the framers was ... What does the 14th Amendment mean and what is its intended scope, as introduced the United States Senate in 1866?

Sen. Jacob M. Howard (MI), who introduced it in the Senate, tells us (as it was being debated):

“The first amendment is to section one, declaring that all “persons born in the United States and Subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside. I do not propose to say anything on that subject except that the question of citizenship has been fully discussed in this body as not to need any further elucidation, in my opinion. This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country ... I concur entirely with the honorable Senator from Illinois [Senator Trumbull], in holding that the word “jurisdiction,” as here employed, ought to be construed so as to imply a full and complete jurisdiction on the part of the United States, whether exercised by Congress, by the executive, or by the judicial department; that is to say, the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now ...”

Sen. Lyman Trumbull, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, author of the Thirteenth Amendment, inserted the phrase:

“... All persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means ... Can you sue a Navajo Indian in court? Are they in any sense subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States? By no means. We make treaties with them, and therefore they are not subject to our jurisdiction. If they were, we wouldn’t make treaties with them...It is only those persons who come completely within our jurisdiction, who are subject to our laws, that we think of making citizens; and there can be no objection to the proposition that such persons should be citizens ...”

Senator W. Williams further stated:

” ... In one sense, all persons born within the geographical limits of the United States are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, but they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States in every sense. Take the child of an ambassador. In one sense, that child born in the United States is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, because if that child commits the crime of murder, or commits any other crime against the laws of the country, to a certain extent he is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, but not in every respect; and so with these Indians. All persons living within a judicial district may be said, in one sense, to be subject to the jurisdiction of the court in that district, but they are not in every sense subject to the jurisdiction of the court until they are brought, by proper process, within the reach of the power of the court. I understand the words here, ‘subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,’ to mean fully and completely subject to the jurisdiction of the United States ...”

Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment, confirms the understanding and construction the framers used in regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866:
” ... I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents [plural, meaning two] not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen...”

Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Obama, admits on his own website that he held British citizenship at birth due to his Father being a British subject and in no way an American. Thus Barry is precisely whom Bingham was implying is not a 'natural born citizen' regardless of where he was born, for purposes of Constitutional eligibility.

13 posted on 12/12/2008 9:59:32 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

This is the first i’ve heard of this. I’m sure this story will have great legs and that people aren’t working themselves up over something that will never happen.


17 posted on 12/12/2008 10:16:56 PM PST by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer
The real fun to be had with this story is not that Obama for any reason would be somehow decreed ineligible as the next President of the United States (it won't happen) but that there apparently is no oversight at all to the election process and a candidates eligibility for that office.

Then maybe the better scenario is that he is found to be ineligible during the first term, becomes totally ineffective, can't run for a second term and we get all that America is a racist nation nonsense out of the way.

19 posted on 12/12/2008 10:40:54 PM PST by TheThinker (Shame and guilt mongering is the Left's favorite tool of control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer; LucyT
Who would have thought that an "I vote present" product of the incredibly corrupt Chicago political machine with a Leftist ideology, a Muslim stepfather, a socialistic economic policy, a radical spiritual mentor, and who is beholden to a domestic terrorist for the launching of his political career could so easily be elected to the Presidency of the United States of America? If I had pitched that scenario to you two years ago you would have called me crazy yet that is exactly the situation we find ourselves in.

and just how many sheep who voted for him, knew any of this?

20 posted on 12/12/2008 10:44:53 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

Thanks for posting—very well written, laid outpiece.


22 posted on 12/12/2008 10:51:18 PM PST by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

This chart clearly demonstrates US citizen, native born US citizen and natural born US citizen requirements.

http://www.theobamafile.com/NaturalBornCitizenChart.htm


23 posted on 12/12/2008 10:52:16 PM PST by Beckwith (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer
"If in fact Obama was born in Kenya, the laws on the books.....blah, blah..

Screw the laws!

"If in fact Obama was born in Kenya then 0bama should be tossed out on his ass for forging government documents (his COLB), Lying to the nation, concealing his true identity, applying for a job that he knew full well he was unqualified for.

Nixon was canned for less.

It's the cover up, stupid!

30 posted on 12/13/2008 12:32:14 AM PST by Wil H (No Accomplishments, No Experience, No Resume No Records, No References, Nobama..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

His father not being a US citizen automatically makes him ineligible.

Definition of Natural Born:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2148074/posts
Law of Nations


38 posted on 12/13/2008 5:01:58 AM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: atlbelle44

FYI


43 posted on 12/13/2008 6:13:14 AM PST by Canedawg ("The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson