Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World's most advanced destroyer handed to Royal Navy
The Daily Telegraph,U.K ^ | 10 Dec 2008 | Thomas Harding

Posted on 12/11/2008 9:20:10 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

World's most advanced destroyer handed to Royal Navy

The world's most advanced destroyer with the capability to defend the entire city of London from missile attack has been handed over to the Royal Navy.

By Thomas Harding, Defence Correspondent

The Type 45 warship will be a significant boost to the Navy that has suffered severe cuts in recent years bringing the latest in anti-missile technology, radar detection and propulsion.

But HMS Daring will have to wait several years to be able to defend the major aircraft carriers that it was built to support as a major delay for the ships is expected to be announced by the Defence Secretary as part of a cost-cutting package.

At a ceremony on the Clyde the staff from BVT Surface Fleet staff from BVT Surface Fleet's shipyard marched off the vessel and were replaced by its Royal Navy crew at an 'acceptance off contract' ceremony in Scotstoun shipyard

Daring will be the first of six warships that have nearly twice the range - about 7,000 miles - and are 45 per cent more fuel-efficient than the Type 42 destroyers that they are replacing in a £6 billion project.

"As commanding officer of Daring, it is an absolute privilege to be the first captain of a ship in the Type 45 fleet," said Captain Paul Bennett. "Daring is a great example of our 21st century Royal Navy."

Following the ceremony in Glasgow the 7,350-tonne will be ready to leave the Clyde for the first time under Royal Navy command in January.

The Type-45 destroyer will be armed with Aster missiles which are capable of knocking down a cricket ball-sized object travelling at three times the speed of sound.

It is also the most eco-friendly ship ever produced for the Royal Navy,

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: destroyer; hmsdaring; navy; royalnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

HMS Daring is a Type 45 destroyer, which will cost £1 billion each Photo: PA

1 posted on 12/11/2008 9:20:12 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Pretty!


2 posted on 12/11/2008 9:23:12 AM PST by Dr. Ursus (( commander of the simian host))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

awesome......


3 posted on 12/11/2008 9:28:30 AM PST by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The Type-45 destroyer will be armed with Aster missiles which are capable of knocking down a cricket ball-sized object travelling at three times the speed of sound.

Sweet! That'll come in useful next time we play Australia, assuming they let us field a Destroyer :0)

4 posted on 12/11/2008 9:29:03 AM PST by agere_contra (So ... where's the birth certificate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Pyramid Power. Looks like the eye on the back of the US $1 dollar bill too.


5 posted on 12/11/2008 9:29:14 AM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Maybe they can use it to shell some of the more islamic cities like Leeds, Birmingham, Londonistan, etc etc.

Why build a billion destroyer when you don’t have the guts to stand up to people pushing sharia in the UK?


6 posted on 12/11/2008 9:29:39 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

It’s part of the secret masonic/templar navy.


7 posted on 12/11/2008 9:30:23 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Dude, I live in Birmingham.

It’s way less Islamic than Detroit. Or your next President for that matter,


8 posted on 12/11/2008 9:31:21 AM PST by agere_contra (So ... where's the birth certificate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Nice...

Does anybody have any data on how well that new angled-construction really works? Does it reduce radar cross-section by a meaningful amount?


9 posted on 12/11/2008 9:35:36 AM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
Can't be, no Eagle.
10 posted on 12/11/2008 9:36:56 AM PST by Little Bill (Just a Poor White Person , clinging to God, Guns, and the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

LOL! Thanks. My mistake. I must be thinking of Manchester.

He is not our President yet. The Kenyan may have a speed bump in SCOTUS tommorrow though I doubt it.


11 posted on 12/11/2008 9:37:29 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Nice boat, where do they hide the sails?


12 posted on 12/11/2008 9:38:23 AM PST by budwiesest (America is about to enter the funniest four years of it's history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
"Or your next President for that matter..."

 

Ouch!


:^)

13 posted on 12/11/2008 9:39:56 AM PST by MyTwoCopperCoins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Wonder if they’ll burn the way the Sheffield did?

A point to consider if the Argies decide to have another
go...


14 posted on 12/11/2008 9:40:18 AM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Interesting observation.


15 posted on 12/11/2008 9:44:08 AM PST by patton (Vista malware delende est - Norton Antivirus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
Dude, I live in Birmingham.

It’s way less Islamic than Detroit. Or your next President for that matter,

Goal!!!

16 posted on 12/11/2008 9:48:13 AM PST by NonValueAdded (once you get to really know people, there are always better reasons than [race] for despising them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Who’s defending London from the real threat, the MOOOOslims?


17 posted on 12/11/2008 9:54:13 AM PST by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Does it reduce radar cross-section by a meaningful amount?

Apparently so since all the large navies (including us) seem to to be building them like this now.

Personally I find these new ships to be ugly as sin but it's the functionality that is important, not the looks.

18 posted on 12/11/2008 9:56:25 AM PST by GATOR NAVY (guess I'm just a spudboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

LoL!


19 posted on 12/11/2008 10:05:26 AM PST by relee ('Till the blue skies drive the dark clouds far away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
The hull looks hydrodynamic/traditional with a modern stealth superstructure.

Some new ships followed the airplanes where the flat/straight lines were dominant everywhere and computers took care of the aerodynamics.

20 posted on 12/11/2008 10:07:18 AM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson