Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Hmm...and no mention that these pictures are criminal, as in child pornography?
1 posted on 12/10/2008 11:26:20 AM PST by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Fractal Trader

This is why I don’t allow my daughter to have a cell phone with a camera in it.


2 posted on 12/10/2008 11:28:45 AM PST by RgnRepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader

This type of stuff is illegal.

I say the schools need to have a strict no cell phone policy.

In emergencies, parents can always call the school. That’s what they did when I was a kid.


3 posted on 12/10/2008 11:29:28 AM PST by lmr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader
One-fifth of teenagers surveyed have sent or posted nude or seminude pictures or videos of themselves

My daughter is still a half a dozen years to young to be participating in behavior like this, but I can only imagine the mortification a parent must feel when confronted with this.

That being said, where would one go to view pictures such as this? For informational purposes of course.

Owl_Eagle

“When the stock market crashed,
Franklin Roosevelt got on the television
and didn’t just talk about
the princes of greed, he said,
‘Look, here’s what happened.’"
-Slow Joe Biden

4 posted on 12/10/2008 11:30:02 AM PST by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader

Is this the one where some parents are actually suing the school for ‘passing around’ the pictures to other teachers to try to determine who was in the pic?


6 posted on 12/10/2008 11:30:48 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader

if it is kids sending to kids is it still considered child porno as it would relate to being passed between adults or adults taking the pics....??...then again this was northen new england right...??...nuff said...


7 posted on 12/10/2008 11:30:48 AM PST by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader
Hmm...and no mention that these pictures are criminal, as in child pornography?

Well sure ... but apparently it's the kids themselves who are posting the pictures and videos. Can you call them "criminals" in the same sense as a NAMBLA mouth-breather?

8 posted on 12/10/2008 11:31:14 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader
"The overwhelming majority of teens and young adults don't do this, but when you get numbers like 20 percent and higher for young adults, that passes the threshhold of concern."

I think that the threshold of concern is a bit lower, some where around 2 to 5 percent.

20 percent is pandemic neighborhood.

9 posted on 12/10/2008 11:31:26 AM PST by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader
Hmm...and no mention that these pictures are criminal, as in child pornography?

Under New Hampshire law, [Rockingham County Attorney Jim Reams] said, students disseminating an inappropriate photo of someone under 16 can be considered to be distributing child pornography. Come January, the threshhold in New Hampshire goes to 18.

I'm quite surprised that kids today would do this. I thought they were supposed to be "tech savvy". I mean, isn't it pretty easy for those cellphone pics to get on the Internet?

Aren't they worried about that?

17 posted on 12/10/2008 11:35:03 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader
If she wants to get my attention,
she needs to send me pics like this!


29 posted on 12/10/2008 11:43:40 AM PST by uglybiker (1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d 2 g3t l41d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader
Maybe if they charged some of the kids who take the pictures (including those who take pictures of themselves) with production of child pornography charges, that would send a message that would stick?
30 posted on 12/10/2008 11:44:07 AM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader

Are cellphones thus open to being searched without a warrant?


58 posted on 12/10/2008 12:01:52 PM PST by Dagny&Hank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader
So kids take nude pictures and pass them around to each other and many of you blame the cellphones? By that same logic guns ARE the problem. While we are banning cell phones and guns I guess we should also ban dietary fat, fast cars, alcohol, and cigarettes. Are there any other behaviors we can modify by banning something?

Back in the day, so I would occasionally hear, there would be a girl or two that would expose herself if the boys begged hard enough. Then the stories and rumors would fly but no proof of course just imaginations filling in the blanks.

The perpetrator of these misdemeanors are not the cameras or the ones who use them but the exhibitionists.

59 posted on 12/10/2008 12:01:59 PM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader

“A report being released today shows that these were not isolated incidents but part of a national trend.”

Slut-Nation


61 posted on 12/10/2008 12:04:19 PM PST by Hacklehead (Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader

Bet their mommies are proud of THEM!


65 posted on 12/10/2008 12:06:30 PM PST by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader

Technology has obviously outpaced the ability to ethically control it. That is the point where parental control/guidance is the last defense. JMO.


74 posted on 12/10/2008 12:14:11 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life ;o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader

The cheerleaders parents must be so proud.....


87 posted on 12/10/2008 12:31:36 PM PST by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader
I was an A/V nerd in High School. Had access to the photo development lab as well.

This is nothing new. Not saying it's right or good, it's just not new. I didn't personally take any photos back then, but I did see some of the negatives that got left in the finisher bath.

114 posted on 12/10/2008 1:14:18 PM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader
Hmm...and no mention that these pictures are criminal, as in child pornography?

There's a complicated legal question. If a 15yo girl takes a picture of herself naked and posts it online is that 'child porn' and should she be prosecuted for disseminating it?

119 posted on 12/10/2008 3:03:07 PM PST by MahatmaGandu (Remember, remember the 26th of November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader

not in NH


136 posted on 12/10/2008 3:42:21 PM PST by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader

My Senior Citizens group does the same thing. Want to see some pics?


147 posted on 12/13/2008 11:29:33 AM PST by metesky (My retirement fund is holding steady @ $.05 a can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson