Hmm...and no mention that these pictures are criminal, as in child pornography?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Fractal Trader
This is why I don’t allow my daughter to have a cell phone with a camera in it.
To: Fractal Trader
This type of stuff is illegal.
I say the schools need to have a strict no cell phone policy.
In emergencies, parents can always call the school. That’s what they did when I was a kid.
3 posted on
12/10/2008 11:29:28 AM PST by
lmr
To: Fractal Trader
One-fifth of teenagers surveyed have sent or posted nude or seminude pictures or videos of themselvesMy daughter is still a half a dozen years to young to be participating in behavior like this, but I can only imagine the mortification a parent must feel when confronted with this.
That being said, where would one go to view pictures such as this? For informational purposes of course.
Owl_Eagle
When the stock market crashed,
Franklin Roosevelt got on the television
and didnt just talk about
the princes of greed, he said,
Look, heres what happened."
-Slow Joe Biden
4 posted on
12/10/2008 11:30:02 AM PST by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: Fractal Trader
Is this the one where some parents are actually suing the school for ‘passing around’ the pictures to other teachers to try to determine who was in the pic?
6 posted on
12/10/2008 11:30:48 AM PST by
mnehring
To: Fractal Trader
if it is kids sending to kids is it still considered child porno as it would relate to being passed between adults or adults taking the pics....??...then again this was northen new england right...??...nuff said...
7 posted on
12/10/2008 11:30:48 AM PST by
tatsinfla
To: Fractal Trader
Hmm...and no mention that these pictures are criminal, as in child pornography? Well sure ... but apparently it's the kids themselves who are posting the pictures and videos. Can you call them "criminals" in the same sense as a NAMBLA mouth-breather?
8 posted on
12/10/2008 11:31:14 AM PST by
r9etb
To: Fractal Trader
"The overwhelming majority of teens and young adults don't do this, but when you get numbers like 20 percent and higher for young adults, that passes the threshhold of concern." I think that the threshold of concern is a bit lower, some where around 2 to 5 percent.
20 percent is pandemic neighborhood.
9 posted on
12/10/2008 11:31:26 AM PST by
Pontiac
(Your message here.)
To: Fractal Trader
Hmm...and no mention that these pictures are criminal, as in child pornography?Under New Hampshire law, [Rockingham County Attorney Jim Reams] said, students disseminating an inappropriate photo of someone under 16 can be considered to be distributing child pornography. Come January, the threshhold in New Hampshire goes to 18.
I'm quite surprised that kids today would do this. I thought they were supposed to be "tech savvy". I mean, isn't it pretty easy for those cellphone pics to get on the Internet?
Aren't they worried about that?
To: Fractal Trader
If she wants to get my attention,
she needs to send me pics like this!![](http://www.chewingthecud.org/steak.jpg)
![](http://www.nwkniterati.com/movabletype/archives/MossyCottage/lasagna.jpg)
29 posted on
12/10/2008 11:43:40 AM PST by
uglybiker
(1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d 2 g3t l41d)
To: Fractal Trader
Maybe if they charged some of the kids who take the pictures (including those who take pictures of themselves) with production of child pornography charges, that would send a message that would stick?
To: Fractal Trader
Are cellphones thus open to being searched without a warrant?
To: Fractal Trader
So kids take nude pictures and pass them around to each other and many of you blame the cellphones? By that same logic guns ARE the problem. While we are banning cell phones and guns I guess we should also ban dietary fat, fast cars, alcohol, and cigarettes. Are there any other behaviors we can modify by banning something?
Back in the day, so I would occasionally hear, there would be a girl or two that would expose herself if the boys begged hard enough. Then the stories and rumors would fly but no proof of course just imaginations filling in the blanks.
The perpetrator of these misdemeanors are not the cameras or the ones who use them but the exhibitionists.
To: Fractal Trader
“A report being released today shows that these were not isolated incidents but part of a national trend.”
Slut-Nation
61 posted on
12/10/2008 12:04:19 PM PST by
Hacklehead
(Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
To: Fractal Trader
Bet their mommies are proud of THEM!
65 posted on
12/10/2008 12:06:30 PM PST by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
To: Fractal Trader
Technology has obviously outpaced the ability to ethically control it. That is the point where parental control/guidance is the last defense. JMO.
74 posted on
12/10/2008 12:14:11 PM PST by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life ;o)
To: Fractal Trader
The cheerleaders parents must be so proud.....
87 posted on
12/10/2008 12:31:36 PM PST by
Badeye
(There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
To: Fractal Trader
I was an A/V nerd in High School. Had access to the photo development lab as well.
This is nothing new. Not saying it's right or good, it's just not new. I didn't personally take any photos back then, but I did see some of the negatives that got left in the finisher bath.
114 posted on
12/10/2008 1:14:18 PM PST by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: Fractal Trader
Hmm...and no mention that these pictures are criminal, as in child pornography? There's a complicated legal question. If a 15yo girl takes a picture of herself naked and posts it online is that 'child porn' and should she be prosecuted for disseminating it?
119 posted on
12/10/2008 3:03:07 PM PST by
MahatmaGandu
(Remember, remember the 26th of November.)
To: Fractal Trader
To: Fractal Trader
My Senior Citizens group does the same thing. Want to see some pics?
147 posted on
12/13/2008 11:29:33 AM PST by
metesky
(My retirement fund is holding steady @ $.05 a can.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson