This is his primary contention, as quoted from his written submission to the SCOTUS:
CONCLUSION
For all of the foregoing reasons, it is respectfully submitted that a natural born Citizen as required by Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5, of the Constitution of the
United States - is a person born in the United States to parents who are both citizens of the United States, and as such Barack Obama would not be eligible to be president.
Hey, I’ll take one parent and born on American soil to qualify as natural born. I don’t think Obama can even clear that bar.
Please send me that link. Thanks.
starting with this
a natural born Citizen ....is a person born in the United States to parents who are both citizens of the United States,
*******
OK clearly Obama has one parent who is US born and one who is not....
**************
So now ...is that the Requirement?
********************
Lets go to this from American Thinker....
Who Enforces the Constitution's Natural Born Citizen Clause?
***************************EXCERPT*****************************
If you believe in individual rights and the notion that our Constitution is a document granting enumerated but limited powers to the federal government, then you have reason to be troubled by the recent dismissal in Berg v. Obama et al.
**********************************
Do read the whold article....
****************************
So the Supreme Court seems to be the enforcer.....I wonder what they are going to say .... about clearing up the definition of natural born citizen...?
From the US State Dept A child born (overseas) whose parents are legally married and one of the parents was a U.S. citizen at the time of the child’s birth acquires U.S. citizenship at birth if the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States for five full years before the child was born and two of those five years were after the parent’s 14th birthday.