Posted on 12/08/2008 11:28:55 AM PST by LongIslandConservative
No. 08A469 Title: Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant v. Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State
Docketed: Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut Case Nos.: (SC 18264)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg. Nov 26 2008 Application (08A469) denied by Justice Ginsburg. Nov 29 2008 Application (08A469) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia. Dec 8 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2008. Dec 8 2008 Application (08A469) referred to the Court by Justice Scalia.
Well, heck if we throw away the constitution with Zer0, we might as well elect Felipe de Jesus CALDERON Hinojosa & the Gay/Green Schwarzenegger for US el presidente 2112!
We can start buying shares in these two while the price is low.
Many if not all of those state laws have "if unable to serve" type of exceptions. Some of those, and others only require voting for the candidate of the party they were elected to vote for, which makes it highly likely that another Dem would be selected by the DNC should The One be DQ'd before the electors vote. If it's after they vote, it seems to me highly likely that one, from the states where it is allowed, will have voted for someone other than McCain or Obama, "just in case", and then that person would selected by the overwhelmingly Democrat
This thread is about the lawsuit, and his position has been to conceal his records.
You can start a new thread on how you want to attract people back to the GOP if you want.
Where does Keyes’ lawsuit fall in all of this?
Hot topic. Lot’s of new people here.
bookmark
Still a couple of direct routes out of Africa with connections to the Dutch East Indies or to the China Sea area would have been the best way to go to and from Africa to Hawaii.
The conference vote will happen on the 12th. The EC vote will happen on the 15th. Unless you can figure a way for the Court to schedule oral arguments and decide the case on the merits in 3 days, that scenario ain’t happening.
If the Court takes the case, their ruling would need to happen before 1/20/09. If so, then we would be witnesses to history - the first time that clause of the 20th Amendment has ever been acted on.
If the ruling were to take place after 1/20/09, the nation would have to depend on Pelosi to approve Impeachment hearings, and the rest of the Dim majorities in the House and Senate to impeach and then remove Obama for fraud.
Yeah, right.
If you link to the one put up by 'Bami on "fight the smears", or the one KOS, or the ones put on FactCheck, yup.
So I might as well save myself the trouble.
Unless you have something new to contribute, like an image of a copy of Obama's certificate of Live Birth (not forged and not the forged Certification that is already suspected of being a forgery). But then having only signed on today, you wouldn't know what was "new" and what was "old".
Yet another signed up today to tell us how to think and how wanting simple enforcement of the Constitution and verification that The One meets its requirements is "distracting".
Is it banner news on the MCM? Seriously I am not watching and just saw this now.
Yeah, right.
Then we have a huge hammer to beat the Dems and Obama into submission every day for defrauding the nation.
Would you say the same thing if Obama were an Asian American whose birth date was in question? (That is the question was "is he old enough", rather than "is he a natural born citizen"?
"He is a sneaky person."
He's NixObama.
----But that wouldn't be fair to Richard Milhouse
We will see. Have you checked out the sources and corroborative resources in:
http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2008/12/donofrio-dual-citizenship-natural-born.html
...?
LMAO!
“Thirty states Secretary of State Offices have joined together questioning the eligibility qualifications of the Democrat Party’s two nominees for the offices they seek. They, the SOSs, plan on ambushing the Electoral College.”
Where did you see this?
Why was it sent to the anthrax lab to begin with?
that there is funny!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.