[atlbelle44]

Update! SCOTUS just updated Cort’s case. It is on the conference schedule for 12/12/08.

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a469.htm

No. 08A469
Title:
Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant
v.
Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State
Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Case Nos.: (SC 18264)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 26 2008 Application (08A469) denied by Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 29 2008 Application (08A469) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 8 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2008.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A469) referred to the Court by Justice Scalia.

[hoosiermama]

News ! News!

[reagandemocrat]

Cool.

[PghBaldy]

IF nothing else, Obama’s gonna be smoking a lot...LOL I wish I could trust that Obama could be forced to divulge, but since there are no policies on how to do it, SCOTUS may just think it is not in their realm. OR, they dont want riots. OR, they dont care. OR, they think he’s done enough, ad the lower courts have ruled. OR

[IrishPennant]

Update! SCOTUS just updated Cort’s case. It is on the conference schedule for 12/12/08. http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a469.htm

I would like to raise one for "Round Two"

[Canedawg]

Thanks. Do you have a link to any good summaries of that case or of the court documents filed in it?

While unsuccessfully searching for one, i came across this aol article that so speedily reported today’s denial in the donofrio case.

but what interested me there was the poll, where 60,000 voted the BC provided was NOT real, and 60,000 voted that it was.
http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/12/05/supreme-court-not-considering-obamas-birth-certificate-case/

even more interesting is that 70% believed that the court would not grant agree to hear the Donofrio case. there seems to be more than a “fringe” of people who are questioning the BC issue, but most seem to understand the process that the system follows.

It is the tresonous MSM that wants people to believe that it is only a fringe element supporting these cases, but we all know how the MSM lies to affect public perception.

[LucyT]

Thanks, atlbelle4 and hoosiermama.

Ping. Look! New news.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2144892/posts?page=544#544

[BP2]

Heard on Crusaderradio at approx 3:15 EST:

Leo was interviewed as saying that he and Cort will be on the US Supreme Court’s steps tomorrow morning (Tues), but nothing is planned or organized — per his words. However, other unconfirmed reports are that Leo might hold a press conference.

Leo confirmed in the radio interview that his case was denied w/o opinion. There is NO confirmation from ANYONE of what the count was — Obot misinformation.

It’s was, AT FIRST, rumored that Leo would be on PlainsRadio tonight, but ED confirmed that Leo will NOT be on the radio tonight because he’s doing some additional work on Cort’s case. Instead, Steve Pidgeon, the lead attorney on the Washington state Supreme Court case will be on PlainsRadio tonight, 8-10 CST. Trying to get that to the SCOTUS this week, too.

Leo noted that it was unusual for Cort’s case to be put bumped ahead of schedule for Conference — it’s believed to accommodate review before the Dec. 15 Electoral College vote:

Leo’s case:
> Nov 19 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008.
> Dec 5 2008 Date of Conference
-————16 Days-————

Cort’s case:
> Dec 8 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2008.
> Dec 12 2008 Date of Conference
-————5 Days-————