Posted on 12/06/2008 12:37:57 PM PST by Fred
Just a few years ago, I took the opportunity to attend special guest appearances by two high-profile political personalities at Syracuse University whose visits were within a few weeks of each otherRalph Reed, former leader of the Christian Coalition and a Republican strategist on the right, and Jocelyn Elders, former surgeon general of the United States during the Clinton administration and a Democrat of decidedly left orientation.
Although their addresses and responses to questions that followed illustrated vividly their wide differences of opinion on current issues, that was not the most striking contrast between the two mid-week evening events at Hendricks Chapel on the university campus. The most significant distinction between them was not the behavior of the respective guests, but the behavior of their audiences.
Dr. Elders drew the smaller audience, most which appeared to be of similar political persuasion. Following her address, she fielded questions from attendees representing both sides of the political spectrum, all of which were presented respectfully and answered by Dr. Elders in an uncompromising but mutually respectful and cordial manner.
By contrast, Dr. Reed drew a much larger audience, but it was evident from the start that many were there to challenge him openly and berate him for his political positions. Far-left activists in the audience were disruptive throughout, and although Dr. Reed completed his address and responded to a few questions with courtesy and dignity, he eventually had to be escorted out of the chapel for his and everyone elses safety.
At the time, what occurred in the chapel that night may have seemed like little more than an isolated example of extreme discourtesy on the part of a few members of the extreme left. But recent reports from across the nation about an increasing incidence of this sort of behavior, and worse, by those on the political left provide evidence of a patternthe use of interference, intimidation, and even violence by left-wing activists in order to suppress opposition to their political viewpoints.
From a few hecklers interrupting an opposing speaker, to same-sex marriage activists disrupting a church service, to left-wing counter-demonstrators accosting an elderly woman and destroying a sign she was carrying, a significant segment of political-left activism has evidently adopted forcible suppression of opposition as an acceptable strategy to advance their causes in the public square.
This is, indeed, the very definition of fascism.
Although Americans are about to witness the inauguration of the most left-leaning president in the nations history, and his administration working in consort with perhaps the most left-leaning congressional majority we have ever seen, it is not from within government that citizens of the republic must first fear the rise of fascism, but from outside and eventually creeping in.
This modern American societal fascism of the left has already become well established across the culture. Some of it arises out of simple, seemingly innocent things that many would scoff at taking very seriously, such as all manner of political correctness, which has been progressing for several years. What is this so-called political correctness, anyway, but activist imposition of revised standards, according to politically left sensibilities, for acceptable and unacceptable thought and behavior?
Like any forced evolution toward political totalitarianismthe logical outcome of an unchecked fascist trendthe progression begins with the seemingly innocent stuff. Eventually, coercion, intimidation, and suppression of non-conforming viewpoints becomes institutionalized here and there on the way to everywhere. Although government may not be initiating the trend or its manifestations, given sufficient political momentum it will be in complicitity at first and later the primary purveyor after things have gone irreversibly too far.
The early signs are plentiful, and typically marked by descriptions that belie the real essence and agenda. Witness the Fairness Doctrineregulation the left-leaning majority in Congress would love to impose on the free-enterprise media market in order to suppress the one traditional outlet the left does not already monopolizetalk radio.
Now, we may be about to witness another example of institutionalized suppression of opposition compliments of another politically left oriented institutionlabor unions. The so-called Employee Free Choice Act, promoted by organized labor leaders and bantered about the news media these days as card check, has been hanging around Congress since 2005. If its supporters can scare up at least 60 votes in the new Senate, this legislation will make it to the presidents desk and, Mr. Obama has signaled, receive his signature.
This legislation would remove the guarantee of a secret ballot wherever employees of a company would be voting on whether to unionize their workplace. The primary objection of those opposed to the legislation? The increased exposure to workers of intimidation and coercion in absence of a secret ballot.
Ironically, rank-and-file union members are overwhelmingly against the proposal being pushed in Congress by their leadership. A recent Zogby poll revealed that 71 percent of union members favor ballot privacy, while a McLaughlin poll showed that 79 percent of Americans oppose card-check legislation that would make private-ballot elections no longer mandatory.
Despite overwhelming favorability numbers like that to retain the basic American right of ballot privacy in the workplace, the small minority who favor card-check legislation are only a couple allied senators away from getting the new law imposed on everyone else. It is just the latest sign, and a pretty glaring one, that the fascism of the left is moving right along as it builds momentum to change the very fabric of the American nation.
Ping
Loyola in Baltimore. The Jesuits seem to be the worst for leftist ideology.
Add the pervasive indoctrination that American school children receive to the instant gratification society that we have evolved into because of our affluence in the age of the computer chip; stir with all the focus on pop culture instead of history and values of decency; and we have a recipe for a country that may not be able to be turned back to the Right.
Amazing << Hear this. Feel this, and tell me that this isn't music.
Groove to Black Violin EPK, too.
Excellent!! You rock!
The Second Coming
Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity...
William Butler Yeats
Thanks some more! I need to sit and read some poetry for a while.
I agree with you. There is the possibility, though - but IMO it can only happen with great difficulty and hardship.
NY ping
ping
thanks, bfl
Don’t forget crossbows, easier to aim and just as silent. In a survival situation, game laws may be pretty much moot.
I’m hoping that whatever the future holds that is not pretty (and there are many scenarios, some unfolding at present) will wake up enough people who are slumbering in the miasma of gross materialism, “me me me-ism”, just plain stupidism, leftism, and so on - to turn the country (and it’s not just our country, actually) around in the right direction.
And pandemic, even if the virus attenuates to a mere 10% CFR - case fatality rate - will disrupt stuff terribly - the illness itself, but supply chains, JIT delivery, emergency responders, hospitals and more will be all messed up. The WHO and CDC are being grossly negligient currently in releasing information about what is currently going on in SE Asia, especially Indonesia and (who the heck knows about) China.
But back to your point - the breakdown of common social and moral values is what is destroying and rotting everything from within. These must be brought back to life or we are doomed as a civilization.
I wasn’t clear - when I said “it’s not just our country” I meant this spiritual sickness is spreading rampant all over the world. And Islamic jihad and culture is a by-product. It claims to be religious but is off the cliff into severe psychopathology that has nothing to do with God, and everything to do with hate and violence. But the problem is that western countries and even India, which has seen the evils perpetrated by Islam up close and personal since the early 700s, have no guts or courage to deal with it as they should.
The left has plans for that too: wolves.
Exactly. Fascism is a politico-economic doctrine, the defining earmarks of which include a pretense at recognizing private property rights, but in actuality seizing the rights of use and disposal of property by government operatives, leaving only the "responsibility" and "liability" of the property in the hands of the purported "owners."
Thanks for the ping!
“... the pushback from the right will not be pretty.”
Amen! Some of the repubs in congress are starting to get it .. but not enough of them yet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.