Thursday morning good news!
1 posted on
12/04/2008 2:21:31 AM PST by
abb
To: 04-Bravo; aimhigh; andyandval; Arizona Carolyn; backhoe; Bahbah; bert; bilhosty; Caipirabob; ...
2 posted on
12/04/2008 2:22:08 AM PST by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: abb
putting “CNN” together with “science” is an oxymoron.
To: abb
So unless Anderson Cooper decides to do an AC360 show on the environment, holding the incoming administration accountable for every hurricane won’t be part of the CNN programming strategy?
10 posted on
12/04/2008 2:48:00 AM PST by
james500
To: abb
Yep! Why have science guys and gals when we all know that The Science Is Settled?
12 posted on
12/04/2008 2:53:07 AM PST by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: abb
"Those CNN phonies should stick to car bombs and beheadings."
15 posted on
12/04/2008 3:01:24 AM PST by
Thrownatbirth
(.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
To: abb
"Now that the bulk of our environmental coverage is being offered through the 'Planet in Peril' franchise which is produced by the 'AC360' program, there is no need for a separate unit."Planet in Peril, conclusion first, evidence later. No wonder CNN doesn't need a separate Science Unit, it does propaganda, not science reporting.
16 posted on
12/04/2008 3:02:29 AM PST by
Jabba the Nutt
(Barack Obama, the American Salvador Allende.)
To: abb
Thursday morning good news! Oh yeah???
So now where are we going to go to find the latest truth about global warming, the hole in the ozone layer, the evils of offshore drilling, the need to protect ANWAR, the protection of old growth from wicked timber companies, the dangers of nuclear energy, and so much more?
And where else are the half dozen or so space cadets going to find work as professional bullsh*t artists, especially in today's economy?
Oh the humanity!
17 posted on
12/04/2008 3:04:00 AM PST by
Zakeet
(Be thankful we don't get all the government we pay for)
To: abb
"It's not good for many reasons but the network's science unit is one of the best in television and probably has a few dozen Emmys to prove it"
Yeah, including that Emmy for discovering that the Space Shuttle is capable of warp speed:
18 posted on
12/04/2008 3:38:43 AM PST by
mkjessup
(Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history. 0bama is his 2nd term.)
To: abb
WOW!!! This whole thread makes me feel warm and fuzzy!! What will all these TV anchors and lousy MSM do to find a new job?! Who will hire such loathsome creatures????
What are some suggested professions that may be a good fit considering their skills?? Hrmmm... Suggestions? IRS? ACLU?? Proctology? Pit-bulldog trainer? Snake charmer?
To: abb
I guess they don’t need a science department now because Obama is going to make science go away. Everything will be done divinely, now. No more globull warming, etc etc etc.
26 posted on
12/04/2008 5:04:00 AM PST by
beckysueb
(Drill here! Drill now!)
To: abb
Are you nuts? They’re saying that CNN is folding their science unit into their envirohysteria unit. That’s the final step in a horrible chain of events.
29 posted on
12/04/2008 5:36:59 AM PST by
dangus
To: abb
...not to mention this happens as CNN tries to replace AP.
30 posted on
12/04/2008 5:37:44 AM PST by
dangus
To: abb
Now that the bulk of our environmental coverage is being offered through the 'Planet in Peril' franchise which is produced by the 'AC360' program, there is no need for a separate unit." "Planet in Peril franchise"??
Yeah riiiiight... that's good science!
31 posted on
12/04/2008 5:45:46 AM PST by
avacado
To: abb
To: abb
33 posted on
12/04/2008 6:56:33 AM PST by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: abb
“We want to integrate environmental, science and technology reporting into the general editorial structure rather than have a stand alone unit.”
Editorial? Doesn’t science deal with clearly demonstrable FACTS?
I guess having both a major and minor in science somehow made me think it had something to do with *facts.* But what do I know?
36 posted on
12/04/2008 1:08:03 PM PST by
Clay Moore
(Newspapers, the 8 track tape of the information age.)
To: abb
“Here's a statement from CNN: ‘ We want to integrate environmental, science and technology reporting into the general editorial structure...’” What, on earth, did they think they'd been doing for the last two decades through their liberal cr@p?
37 posted on
12/04/2008 2:01:36 PM PST by
ConservativeMind
(Obama is bringing in every crook and bumbler he can to assure consistency in his message.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson