Posted on 11/30/2008 6:09:20 PM PST by Red Steel
Citizenship Issue on MSNBC Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17.8 allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the childs birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence. The parents would be issued a Certification of Live Birth.
This is not proof of where the child was born. It only proves that the parents claimed Hawaii as their main place of residence for the prior year.
British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.
A natural born citizen, would not be a citizen of any other nation than the United States. That is what "natural born" means. By nature, the child, would be only a US citizen, because both of his parents were US citizens, and NO OTHER NATION, can by law claim him to be under their jurisdiction, at the moment of his birth. That was not the case with Obama. He was, by law, a Citizen of the United Kingdom, the moment he was born, and then, by law, he became a citizen of Kenya on Dec. 12, 1963.
For a more detailed explaination of natural born citizen, see my other related video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp2kKN...
5-4-3-2-1.....waitng for the naysayers to show up and tell you you’re wasting our efforts.
I’m cheering this on. It might be our salvation from 4 years of BS
IF DA BIRTH PLACE IS A LIE, BEING DA PRESIDENT AIN’T GONNA FLY!
Just my guess. No judge will overturn the election no matter how this turns out. That being said, have fun with this. Remember how long democrats said GWB was selected? Some held on past 2004.
Untill it is proven one way or another, this can only bring an even more devided Nation.
That's an indictment on our judicial system. They won't follow the law that they swore to uphold, pretty sad.
So the Constitution gets thrown out because political correctness over-rules it?
I agree. No matter how compelling a story and regardless of the truth, I can’t see a court overturning the election. (I can wish though...)
I don't see anything in the HRS section that says a BC shall/may be issued to a child born outside of Hawaii stating (erroneously) that the child was born in Hawaii as opposed to listing the actual place of birth.
That is the piece that is missing here...
We’re not asking anybody to overturn the election. We’re just asking that 0 not be permitted *serve* as POTUS if not natural born.
For later, and BUMP.
If the press could get Nixon out they could do the same for the 0.
I also remember how we were ridiculed by staying on top of "Rathergate", and that it would never go anywhere.....
You either play the hand you're dealt, or fold.
he should not be allowed to take office til he can prove he meets all the requirements.
Thanks for presenting this. This case is beginning to grow legs. I can see Obama being declared ineligible.
http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244
I have that fear in my gut, as well, but...
Assuming it's clearly established that he's not a natural-born citizen, exactly HOW would a court go about totally ignoring the constitution, which is exactly what must be done if he's allowed to take office? The rule of law would be truly meaningless in the USA.
MM (in TX)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.