Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gohmert Proposes Skipping Federal Income Tax
Tyler Morning Telegraph ^ | 11/30/2008 | Adam Russell

Posted on 11/30/2008 2:16:43 PM PST by crusty old prospector

Gohmert Proposes Skipping Fed Income Tax

By ADAM RUSSELL Staff Writer

U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Tyler, proposed that the U.S. government stimulate the country's economy by collecting no federal income tax this year.

Aside from the hundreds of billions of dollars in bailout money appropriated by Congress and the Senate recently, Gohmert said, total economic obligation has topped $7.7 trillion so far.

Gohmert said, as the current administration continues obligating trillions of taxpayer dollars to bail out failing businesses, a better, cheaper solution to revive the economy would be to suspend collection of the estimated $1.2 trillion the U.S. Treasury will receive in 2008.

"Secretary (of Treasury Henry) Paulson continues his unfettered spending spree and is driving our country further from the core capitalist principles on which it was founded," Gohmert said in a statement. "His and the Fed's bailouts in the past few months have set a dangerous and unmistakable precedent to nationalize or socialize our banking, insurance and investment firms; and now car companies and other industries, states and cities are also lined up with hands out.

"I am proposing that we end the giveaway power of Secretary Paulson and the Fed immediately and declare that taxpayers will pay no 2008 income taxes," he said.

Gohmert said the influx of money back into taxpayer's hands will create a surge in the economy. He said cars will be bought, houses will be built, mortgages paid, credit cards paid off and Christmas presents bought.

The stimulating effects of no federal tax would also provide a tax boon to states and cities that desperately need money to repair and build infrastructure, he said.

Gohmert said he was upset to hear disconcerting reports that some of the banks receiving bailout money will not use it to make more loans or shore up 'troubled assets' but will instead use the money to buy up smaller competitors, basically using tax dollars to monopolize banking.

He said these problems within the bailout signal why direct government intervention cannot and will not work. Gohmert proposes letting people that earn the money, the taxpayers, decide who gets bailed out by buying products and utilizing the companies that are best meeting their needs.

"My idea may sound unconventional, but it is trillions of dollars cheaper than our current course," he said. "My proposal actually relies on our nation's founding democratic principles that made us the greatest nation in the world before anyone ever heard of Mr. Henry Paulson."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: govwatch; lp; taxes; taxholiday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
Now, this is my (and his) idea of a bailout.
1 posted on 11/30/2008 2:16:44 PM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

That’s my congressman, one of the last Conservative ones left.


2 posted on 11/30/2008 2:18:26 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Yep, I have voted for him three times myself.


3 posted on 11/30/2008 2:20:09 PM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

Mega-bucks in my pocket ping! (Mega to me at least.)


4 posted on 11/30/2008 2:21:18 PM PST by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

“Starve the beast”


5 posted on 11/30/2008 2:22:18 PM PST by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

How about this idea: balance the friggin budget


6 posted on 11/30/2008 2:22:22 PM PST by ari-freedom (Conservatives solve problems. Libertarians ignore problems. Liberals create problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randomhero97

doesn’t work. We need to cut spending.


7 posted on 11/30/2008 2:23:12 PM PST by ari-freedom (Conservatives solve problems. Libertarians ignore problems. Liberals create problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

Excellent idea! I love Judge Gomert! Let those that earn the money keep it...although, I doubt politicians in Washington will go for that, since it prevents them from doling it out to their cronies buying favors and votes for themselves


8 posted on 11/30/2008 2:23:53 PM PST by AprilfromTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

I suggested that McCain propose a total federal tax holiday (instead of just a gas tax holiday) for 6 months or a year as part of his campaign. It might have resulted in his election.

I have no doubt this proposal would go a long way toward fixing America’s and the world’s economy if implemented.


9 posted on 11/30/2008 2:23:56 PM PST by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

If it didn’t happen under the Compassionate Conservative, I will guarantee you that it won’t happen under the Compassionate Communist.


10 posted on 11/30/2008 2:24:27 PM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

can you tell me what is conservative about destroying America’s credit rating?


11 posted on 11/30/2008 2:24:50 PM PST by ari-freedom (Conservatives solve problems. Libertarians ignore problems. Liberals create problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Can you tell me what’s conservative about income taxes?


12 posted on 11/30/2008 2:26:12 PM PST by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FFranco

holidays are gimmicks. We need a permanent lowering of taxes (at least keep the Bush tax cuts from expiring), not a temporary abolition of taxes.


13 posted on 11/30/2008 2:26:58 PM PST by ari-freedom (Conservatives solve problems. Libertarians ignore problems. Liberals create problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

Even with no income tax the federal govt would still probably make the same revenue due to excise and indirect taxes, of which would grow huge because of much increased economic activity. Throw in some tariffs on chaep walmart crap and you have a winner.


14 posted on 11/30/2008 2:27:40 PM PST by central_va (Co. C, 15th Va., Patrick Henry Rifles-The boys of Hanover Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randomhero97

oh believe me you’ll get a major tax increase after this ‘holiday’ is over. The interest on the debt will skyrocket.


15 posted on 11/30/2008 2:28:01 PM PST by ari-freedom (Conservatives solve problems. Libertarians ignore problems. Liberals create problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

I don’t disagree with you there. However, income taxes, or should I say government sponsored extortion, should be elimintated permanently.


16 posted on 11/30/2008 2:30:53 PM PST by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: central_va

ok so we’ll default on the debt that we owe China AND we’ll sock them with tariffs. Say goodbye to Taiwan and hello WW3.


17 posted on 11/30/2008 2:31:27 PM PST by ari-freedom (Conservatives solve problems. Libertarians ignore problems. Liberals create problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
holidays are gimmicks. We need a permanent lowering of taxes (at least keep the Bush tax cuts from expiring), not a temporary abolition of taxes.

Actually, a one year income tax holiday would teach an enormous lesson to the public -- when people realized how much money was absorbed by government they would be much more likely to support future tax cuts.

18 posted on 11/30/2008 2:32:07 PM PST by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: randomhero97

well, you’d have to replace it with another tax system unless you expect people to voluntarily donate to the govt. That will only happen when govt delivers real value with all the money it spends.


19 posted on 11/30/2008 2:34:00 PM PST by ari-freedom (Conservatives solve problems. Libertarians ignore problems. Liberals create problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AprilfromTexas

I don’t see how this helps for 2008. Hasn’t the federal government already collected most of that money through witholding? And then folks get to apply to maybe get some of it back? I know that’s not universally true, but wouldn’t it be mostly the case?


20 posted on 11/30/2008 2:34:10 PM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson