Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I think you could generously interpert his remarks as being sad that anyone, including Indians, were killed. He was obviously choosing his words very carefully. It’s hard to always be perfectly clear when speaking, often, the wrong words come out. I’ll give him a pass.


15 posted on 11/28/2008 5:42:44 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (The Democratic Party strongly supports full civil rights for necro-Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Perhaps, but it was a very strange formulation that to me smacked of PC sentiment. Would he ever have said the opposite in a similar situation: that it was too bad other terrorists missed, say, Darfurians and hit Americans?


16 posted on 11/28/2008 5:50:31 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Keeping track of the MSM so you don't have to!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

I am going to give him a pass, too. It was a bad way to say it but I can understand his point. The targets were not Indians and, unfortunately ,they got caught up in it. It was the British and the Americans that were suppose to pay the price for being infidels or whatever their excuse is for killing us.


21 posted on 11/28/2008 6:02:53 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson