Skip to comments.
Miami Judge Rules Against Florida Gay Adoption Ban
AP ^
| 11/25/08
| Curt Anderson
Posted on 11/25/2008 11:11:11 AM PST by steve-b
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
1
posted on
11/25/2008 11:11:12 AM PST
by
steve-b
To: steve-b
Amazing. Legislating from the bench. They need to impeach this idiot.
2
posted on
11/25/2008 11:12:46 AM PST
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: steve-b
When we will start hanging these jackals in black robes? How DARE this prick legislate!
3
posted on
11/25/2008 11:13:25 AM PST
by
PeterFinn
(Joe Biden for President)
To: steve-b
And Sandra Day says we are wrong to criticize judges?
We are wrong for not kicking hell out of judges like this turd.
4
posted on
11/25/2008 11:13:38 AM PST
by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
To: pissant
We elect judges in this state............
5
posted on
11/25/2008 11:14:57 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Never has a man risen so far, so fast and is expected to do so much, for so many, with so little...)
To: steve-b
“Miami Judge Rules Against Florida Gay Adoption Ban”
A judge rules AGAINST gays???? OMG!!!!
6
posted on
11/25/2008 11:15:04 AM PST
by
Grunthor
(bush04 - 62, 040, 610 mccain08 - 58, 164, 693.......Moving left is NOT the answer!)
To: Grunthor; steve-b; All
never mind, I misunderstood the headline.
7
posted on
11/25/2008 11:15:55 AM PST
by
Grunthor
(bush04 - 62, 040, 610 mccain08 - 58, 164, 693.......Moving left is NOT the answer!)
To: steve-b
These damn judges think they rule us.
To: Red Badger
9
posted on
11/25/2008 11:19:57 AM PST
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: lady lawyer
These damn judges think they rule us. Waddya mean 'think'?
They order, we obey. Sounds like 'rule' to me.
L
10
posted on
11/25/2008 11:20:12 AM PST
by
Lurker
("America is at that awkward stage. " Claire Wolfe, call your office.)
To: steve-b
Ten years from now it will be ruled that pedophiles can adopt.
11
posted on
11/25/2008 11:21:22 AM PST
by
keats5
("I hope for his sake, Joe Biden got that VP thing in writing."- Rudy)
To: steve-b
Does this mean if I get (s)elected to the bench, I can rule however I please on laws to suit my personal agenda ? If so, I got a $hitload of things that need changing tout de suite.
12
posted on
11/25/2008 11:22:55 AM PST
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: pissant
Cindy sounds so “gay” herself.
13
posted on
11/25/2008 11:27:12 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: steve-b
I don’t like the way that gay couples rear kids.
14
posted on
11/25/2008 11:27:33 AM PST
by
Bon mots
To: steve-b
Cindy is on the right and her "very close friend" is on the left in this picture.
15
posted on
11/25/2008 11:28:39 AM PST
by
capt. norm
(Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
To: steve-b
If this is appealed the Florida Supreme Court will get a crack at it soon, and may actually uphold the ban.
16
posted on
11/25/2008 11:44:37 AM PST
by
BlueStateBlues
(Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
To: pissant
Judges have a 95% re-reelection rate IIRC....
17
posted on
11/25/2008 11:45:35 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Never has a man risen so far, so fast and is expected to do so much, for so many, with so little...)
To: capt. norm
GADS!...GAAAK!....Not Even if I were gay...........
18
posted on
11/25/2008 11:46:38 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Never has a man risen so far, so fast and is expected to do so much, for so many, with so little...)
To: pissant
The sad truth is most legislators are more than happy to have the judges do the tough jobs for them. That is why you don’t see more impeachments...
19
posted on
11/25/2008 11:48:01 AM PST
by
Unlikely Hero
("Time is a wonderful teacher; unfortunately, it kills all its pupils." --Berlioz)
To: steve-b
This sounds like a case where the judge has ruled that the state law in not based in logic (at least in her view and some of the expert witnesses) and thus not valid. It would seem to me in adoption cases, the state has loco parentis rights and, in the judgment of the legislature and executive branch, these children are best raised with heterosexual parents. With this reasoning, a judge can supplant any parental decision based on the court’s interpretation of what is in the child’s interest. It would seem to me that a state can pass laws based on “because we want to” and not have to scientifically justify each law.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson