Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Price of Our Good Name (NY Times - Must be read not to be believed!)
The New York Times ^ | November 23, 2008

Posted on 11/23/2008 6:14:03 AM PST by publius1

Americans have watched in horror as President Bush has trampled on the Bill of Rights and the balance of power. The list of abuses that President-elect Barack Obama must address is long: once again require the government to get warrants to eavesdrop on Americans; undo scores of executive orders and bill-signing statements that have undermined the powers of Congress; strip out the unnecessary invasions of privacy embedded in the Patriot Act; block new F.B.I. investigative guidelines straight out of J. Edgar Hoover’s playbook.

Those are not the only disasters Mr. Obama will inherit. He will have to rescue a drowning economy, restore regulatory sanity to the financial markets and extricate the country from an unnecessary war in Iraq so it can focus on a necessary war in Afghanistan.

Even with all those demands, there is one thing Mr. Obama must do quickly to begin to repair this nation’s image and restore its self-respect: announce a plan for closing Mr. Bush’s outlaw prison at Guantánamo Bay.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arrogance; commieganda; dbm; enemedia; liberalmedia; mediabias; newspapers; nyslimes; nyt; slimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
Here are my thoughts on the subject.

It's not news to me that this B.B. continues to be spewed out by these criminal elements. This newspaper along with the entire mainstream media has become an absolute criminal enterprise.

It's time to put the entire mainstream media out of business. They have done a trmendous disservice to this country with their blatant bias against christians and conservatives.

BTTT to all of the responses in this thread.

Regards........

41 posted on 11/23/2008 6:47:30 AM PST by E.G.C. (Click on a freeper's screename and then "In Forum" to read his/her posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
The taint of Guantánamo is so great that right now even close allies will not consider resettling prisoners who should be set free because they committed no crimes of any kind.

Moonbattery and breathless hyperbole aside, this editorial features just pathetic illogical writing.

What does the quote above even mean? The "taint" of Guantanamo makes our friends not want to welcome "innocent" former detainees? Are they saying this taint taints the US? George Bush? The detainees?

So Canada may not want some Yemeni fundamentalist shithooks captured on the battlefields of Afghanistan running around blowing shit up in Toronto because some Obama lawyers get some Clinton-appointed moonbat judges to declare them victims of George Bush's gestapo?

Oh the shame of this smelly taint spot falls on us all...

42 posted on 11/23/2008 6:49:04 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
I've read the replies, and I have a different feeling.

Zero has a following .. I don't believe it is as large as to legitimately capture the electoral votes for President, but a sizeable following none-the-less.

There's not too many palces one can lay his eyes or ears where one is not assaulted with zero-bilia ... coins, dollars, etc.

From the day Zero became 'the annointed' ... he became the annointed.

No amount of expose', nor ridicule, nor rational argument has swayed the Cipher from it's annointed task.

So the plan just keeps chugging along, merrily performing and accomplishing.

The slimes doesn't care about circulation or emplyees ... it has a mission ... reach the ones that are part of the program, re-iterate the talking points, and show they may be dieing, but not dead.


We do ourselves a grave blow by not taking seriously the coup that is being accomplished ... and all of our humorous lines merely add to their glee.

43 posted on 11/23/2008 6:50:01 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1

Your Editorial “The Price of Our Good Name” is just another example of the total anti-American children of Hitler and Stalin that live at the New York Times.

Why did you not say?

“The New York times committed Treason by giving the terrorist killers access into the process by which they were being found.”

“The New York Times is a totally anti-American organization that is owned, run and written in by a group of the children of Hitler and Stalin.”

“Please let the terrorist be released in The New York Times Building as we will give them money and metals for killing Americans and push them to new killing heights.”

“The New York Times wants to destroy the American Constitution and make it a left wing dictatorship like their ancestors Hitler and Stalin.”

“The New York Times lies on a daily basis in order to support the enemies of the American People just as do CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, Newsweek, Time and 99.9% of all so called media.”

“The New York Times will be informed of any terrorist attack so that they can move out of the way and watch from a distance as Americans die and then cheer for their terrorist relatives.”

Much, Much more of course but hopefully your organization will go broke and be put in the trash where you belong.


44 posted on 11/23/2008 6:51:09 AM PST by YOUGOTIT (The Greatest Threat to our Security is the Royal 100 Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
Mr. Obama will have only his first year in office to (semi-credibly) assign blame for either his own screw-ups or any lingering policies which enrage leftists to George Bush. After that, everything is on Obama.

So when the New York Times gets it's wish, and the Patriot Act is discarded, and the eavesdropping on terrorist phone calls program is stopped, and taxes are raised to old Soviet Socialist Republic levels, and terrorists who are back in circulation in the world because Barack Obama closed Guantanamo Bay begin bombing American citizens on American soil, all of which will take about a year or so to accomplish, none of the horrifying consequences will be George Bush's "fault".

It will all be on Obama, and his failed, Clinton administration retreads, and all the dumb, deluded fools who put these people in office.

What will the Times do then?

45 posted on 11/23/2008 6:51:40 AM PST by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1

LOL @ the NYT...


46 posted on 11/23/2008 6:52:25 AM PST by Dallas59 (Not My President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
So, the NYT REALLY DOES want terrorists let loose on America!

Little Green Footballs had a poll about what should be done with them:

Repatriate them
Try them in the civil courts
House them in a tent city on the White House lawn.

Guess which one won.

47 posted on 11/23/2008 6:54:28 AM PST by DejaJude (Obama, the "Leader Dearest" of the nanny state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
"Using the same logic, it would make sense for a liberal administration to shut down right-wing media...would you support that?"

I prefer to use logic based on reason.

The nyt committed treason on numerous occasions during the Bush administration's terms. Prosecuting a newspaper for despicable crimes is hardly the same as shutting down a publication because the administration disagrees with it's opinion.

48 posted on 11/23/2008 6:55:45 AM PST by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: publius1
Prisoners with a credible fear of abuse cannot be sent to that fate. They will have to be sent to other countries to live. The best way for the United States to get other governments to cooperate is to accept some detainees for settlement in this country.

These motherf#*kers are insane! Presumbably, the Times proposes we give them new identities and government purchased homes in random US neighborhoods. Local police would not even be informed and surveillance on them would be expressly forbidden by the courts.

Upon their release, we'll hand them a new suit and some reasonable length of detonation cord to get them started.

And because of Bush even our closest allies won't agree to do the same even after we set an example!

49 posted on 11/23/2008 6:57:03 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
Editors, New York Times:

What precisely do you mean by “our good name”?

You’re not Americans. You’re just journalists.

And I’m horrified to say it, but it’s true: You and your fellow journalists have actually gotten worse since those lines first hit the air.

50 posted on 11/23/2008 6:57:20 AM PST by RichInOC (Obama/Biden '08: "We Are Not Ruled By Murderers, But Only--By Their Friends."--Rudyard Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

HA Ha! NYT at $5!

Such a dilemma. Line the bitdcage with their newspaper, or with their stock certificates!

I tried to short the NYT at $25, but ScottTrade for some reason couldn’t cover it (yeah, don’t ask me).


51 posted on 11/23/2008 6:58:52 AM PST by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: publius1

Bill signing statements undermine the power of Congress?

Wow!


52 posted on 11/23/2008 6:58:55 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Hey, Obama! Where's my check?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1

If someone got this from the NY times website then they (the times) received ad revenue because of the hits. Never - never - go to their site download the articles or ready the paper. That paper is headed for the scrap heap of journalistic history let not help them survive.


53 posted on 11/23/2008 6:59:37 AM PST by wewereright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
-- and this is only part! These guys don't live on my planet!

They live in an alternate universe. None on the left have ever given a name to any American whose rights were "trampled". Our only example is Joe the Plumber, and that was done in the name of the lord 0bama, pbuh. Expect more of that in the future.

Everything else they condemn Bush for was in undoing the damages done by the Clintons (and covered over by falsified official data), and the last two years of economic lunacy presided over by a RAT congress and willing RINOs.

54 posted on 11/23/2008 7:02:55 AM PST by 300winmag (Overkill never fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
PLEASE, PLEASE; if we are subjected to another terror attack, let it be the Times building!

If not, let their slide into irrelevance accelerate.

55 posted on 11/23/2008 7:05:28 AM PST by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
I'm going to say $45 per share since the NYT is down that much since its 2002 high. LOLOLOL.

I read that the current price closed around $5.00/share, down about 80% in the last 3 years....

56 posted on 11/23/2008 7:06:19 AM PST by dirtbiker (Joe Biden has an IQ of 146 and no idea how to use it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: publius1
Ahhhhh...sweet schadenfreude.


57 posted on 11/23/2008 7:10:30 AM PST by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
They've caught up to DemocraticUnderground in content quality, and remain barely ahead of the website in readership.

"The New York Times: Like Democratic Underground, but with complete sentences."

58 posted on 11/23/2008 7:10:44 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (ACORN is a criminal enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DejaJude
House them in a tent city on the White House lawn.

I see my vote was in the majority.

59 posted on 11/23/2008 7:11:33 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: publius1

NYT is a criminal organization and should be protested and picketed out of business. That is legal, isn’t it?


60 posted on 11/23/2008 7:13:34 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Stop feeding Leftist education systems. Don't let your kids go there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson