Posted on 11/23/2008 12:51:02 AM PST by CE2949BB
It was an unspeakable nightmare.
As Andre Daniels was held at gunpoint outside his San Francisco housing project apartment early one morning three years ago, his wife was sexually assaulted inside their home while their two children slept.
Daniels, then 31, was determined to seek justice for his family. So he did what is often considered unthinkable in a community hostile to "snitching." He helped the police.
Then he made another fateful decision: He spurned the burdens of the city's witness protection and relocation program. He figured he would simply move his family to safety a few miles away to another public housing project in the southeast part of the city.
One day this past May, Daniels' gamble ended at his doorstep. After taking his children to school, Daniels was shot to death outside his apartment at the Alice Griffith project in the Bayview.
Police are investigating whether he was killed to keep him from going to court to testify against the alleged attackers, but have made no arrests. Without Daniels' testimony, the two men he helped jail soon admitted to lesser crimes as part of a plea deal and went free. Their attorneys say the men had nothing to do with the killing.
With the mystery unsolved, however, Daniels' death is serving as a painful reminder to authorities who rely on witnesses to make their cases about the price that can come with cooperation. Some wonder what more they could do to protect witnesses who reject programs designed to assure their safety.
At the crime-plagued Alice Griffith project, Daniels' death was clearly interpreted as a message, police say. Cooperative witnesses now are harder to come by than ever.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
Sad.
“...Daniels’ death was clearly interpreted as a message...Cooperative witnesses now are harder to come by than ever.”
I guess that means that illegal aliens won’t cooperate with the police no matter what, so there should be no hesitation in arresting them.
sad indeed. arm yourselves. speak softly and carry a big gun.
Why this man spurned witness protection is beyond me.
Big city crime... liberalism in action.
Authorities might wish to consider prosecuting anybody who wears “no snitching” and “snitches get stitches” tee-shirts on charges of Intimidation and Uttering a Threat. Perhaps even Thwarting the Cause of Justice.
It’s admittedly a ham-fisted approach, but it would send a suitable message back: if you encourage a climate of lawlessness you can expect to pay a price.
At least the poor guy didn’t have a gun, otherwise he would have been a criminal and could have gotten in big trouble if caught
sounds like the littlest police chief who’s hat doesnt fit is doing a FINE job.
oh no, dont let that genie out of the bottle altho the “snitches get stitches” is stupid we would never charge someone with that, I can see them going after us for wearing GOD bless America.
This man was an illegal?
WTFO!
I really hope that someone with an ounce of intelligence fires these stupid a$$ politicians or at the very least builds a wall around the state and fills it with their own excrement. Because they certainly not worth a sh!t to anyone else and the masses are too stupid to deserve this country.
Just my ever humble opinion
black on black crime, acceptable, black on white crime, acceptable, white on black crime racist. Don’t ya just love liberalism?
> altho the “snitches get stitches” is stupid we would never charge someone with that,
Let me explain my rationale: criminal communication has never been protected as Free Speech. Witness intimidation, uttering threats, and thwarting the cause of Justice are all serious crimes which can (arguably) be achieved by wearing a tee-shirt that threatens “snitches” with “getting stitches”. The threat is explicit and obvious. It’s not merely a fashion statement, it is a criminal communication that says “if you report a crime we will assault you and give you serious injuries.”
So I say round up a few of them, press charges really hard, and try to make them stick. All you need is one precedent, so pick the jurisdiction and prosecuting attorney carefully. The rest should follow.
If nothing else, it gives the cops good enough reason to arrest someone and haul them into the station for further questioning. Who knows? They might be wanted on outstanding warrants, or carrying drugs, or suspects in other more serious crimes.
> I can see them going after us for wearing GOD bless America.
Now *that* would surely fail. Religious expression is protected as Free Speech, and always has been.
Lewis was freed in July, getting credit for three years prison time already served in jail stemming from an assault charge connected to the Daniels case.
No DNA evidence, no fingerprint evidence, nothing from a search warrant, nothing future wiretaps couldn't produce? the perps had perfect alibis? Since when does a case like this rest solely on one victim's evidence? A good man's family has been brutalised twice and still can't get justice. San Francisco is a putrid hole, in my mind its name has the same connotations as Fallujah or Mogadishu. Bring on the next earthquake, the city deserves to sink beneath the waves.
sanfruitcisco is heading for the fate GOD dealt sodom... and I will not mourn that day.
LLS
Arm yourselves. speak softly and carry alot of big guns bring friends.
Another Obama City success story.
Ah, another government success story.
Yep, out to rape again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.