Based on what the office ought to call for.
She is more qualified than Obama. She has the same qualifications as Reagan and Bill Clinton and more than Hillery and Biden
Yes, she's more qualified than DingDong. I never said she wasn't. Yes, she's more qualified than Shrillary. I never said she wasn't. Clinton, I'm not sure...maybe. She's certainly better ethically and morally. And Reagan? No way. Running California (what is it, the sixth or seventh largest economy in the world?) is so unlike Alaska isn't not even funny.
I said Sarah Palin wasn't qualified for being picked as VP. I didn't slur her ethics, morals, character, ability, intelligence or anything else. I said she wasn't ready, now, for this job.
And what I get, from the so-called logical non-emotion driven conservatives is being called a moron, a troll, an idiot, stupid, and an Obama lover. This is the face of conservatism.
The only reason Obama won is because of the moral state of this country and with the help of $$$$ from Saudis, Socialists, communists, anti American liberal and poor ignorance of this generation.
Ok,,, so what exactly make a person qualified in your mind,, only governor of Calif, Tex or NY? Im fascinated.
And i guess Bill Clinton was qualified after arkansas,,huh?
And Jimmy Carter?
No. You said she wasn't qualified.
Now you want to modify that by admitting she is more qualified than some but not others. So, I suggest you state clearly what experience, what size state, what size corporation what age what universities whatever you regard as sufficiently over the line to permit someone to run for VP.
Then all future candidates can consult your list of requirements and save themselves the trouble of running a futile campaign.
I'm pretty sure your list will disqualify anyone who hasn't been a political hack for years, thereby eliminating for consideration any normal person. I also suspect the Founding Fathers would have had an issue with that.
And for the record, I would vote for any lover of liberty over any collectivist no matter what the disparity in experience. I don't need an experienced tyrant in office.
And what I get, from the so-called logical non-emotion driven conservatives is being called a moron, a troll, an idiot, stupid, and an Obama lover.
You got called out on an unsupported and baseless slam at someone most conservatives see as a person with the right stuff to bring us out of the wilderness of crushing left-liberalism gone mad.
You didn't even try to temper your initial statements with any sort of reason or analysis, but straight out of the gate, you started in with slanderous terms like, "unqualified", "not ready", etc., all of which are practically trademarked anti-Palinisms from the leftist mainstream media.
And you have the gall to whine that you're being "attacked"? You're being called out on your transparent hatred for Sarah Palin, and yes, there's been some emotional response to your statements, as well.
If you're such a thinking conservative, then you'll sit back and formulate a conservative argument for your statements against Sarah Palin.
Otherwise, everything you've said so far is typical slander with little reasoning.