Why is this a dangerous precedent?
Questions about Obama’s birth certificate and eligibility to run for POTUS were raised as early as last spring. The DNC HAD to be aware of this, and yet they did nothing. They didn’t WANT to check whether he was eligible to run or not.
If it turns out that he is not eligible, then the DNC will be almost as much to blame as Obama himself.
No, it’s not ideal to raise such an issue after someone has been elected. But whose fault is that?
Gee, so if the DNC is found to be negligent (or whatever) as well if BHO is ineligible, does that mean they’ll have to redistribute all their wealth to the people who have been harmed by this attempted subversion of the Constitution ... We the People?
I think this is why Dean high tailed out of the DNC Chair spot just days after the election.
Absolutely! If no one is willing to vet Obama’s citizenship, especially in light of the theatrics he has been playing, then we really do live in a banana republic. It is getting so bad, with all the voter fraud stuff from the democratic party...which to them is a “right” for the democrats, but a fraud by the republicans, that we already have a serious situation. How can our government not step in and demand that states oversee the election process in a just way? If we are saying that the problem is too big, then our country is in big trouble, my friends.
If it is determined that he was not eligible to run, could those poor folks who donated money to his campaign demand a refund or sue claiming criminal fraud?
>>>The DNC HAD to be aware of this, and yet they did nothing.
Berg’s filing shows that too. Berg’s filing had 2 parts. The one against the DNC is strong.