Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/17/2008 3:46:07 AM PST by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: abb

ping


2 posted on 11/17/2008 3:46:28 AM PST by Mike Fieschko (et numquam abrogatam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko; Buckhead

Buckhead pinged, as his sterling work is indirectly referenced about halfway down.


3 posted on 11/17/2008 3:55:55 AM PST by agere_contra (So ... where's the birth certificate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko
***Shape up or risk extinction***

TOO LATE!

As soon as Circuit City starts the reorganizing they will be forced to cut their advertising in newspapers and thus shrinking the newspaper's revenue even more. I've already noticed car companies have cut their ads down by over half what it was in The Dallas Morning Snooze. There will be more to follow and it only hurts more as Christmas gets closer.

The Drive-by Media tried to put Conservatives out of business but it looks like we'll have the last laugh.

6 posted on 11/17/2008 3:59:15 AM PST by tobyhill (Why did Obama not cross the road? He has no guts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko
if papers provide readers with news they can trust

Long odds there.

7 posted on 11/17/2008 4:05:45 AM PST by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko
It takes no special genius to point out that if you are contemptuous of your customers, you are going to have a hard time getting them to buy your product.

Does that mean a little sit down with Shepard Smith is on its way, Rupe?

9 posted on 11/17/2008 4:16:02 AM PST by LRS ("Good-bye freedom/ hello fear/ A brave new world has suddenly appeared")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko

“A recent American study reported that many editors and reporters simply do not trust their readers to make good decisions. Let’s be clear about what this means. This is a polite way of saying that these editors and reporters think their readers are too stupid to think for themselves.”

Glad to see a newspaper man see the light. Unfortunatlely, most people in the news business will read that and think ‘I know he’s not talking about me.”


11 posted on 11/17/2008 4:32:45 AM PST by ByteMercenary (9-11: supported everywhere by followers of the the cult of islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko

It used to be that a handful of editors could decide what was news-and what was not.That never changed


12 posted on 11/17/2008 4:32:49 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko

We dropped our subscription to the Wall Street Journal over their obnoxious boosterism for illegal aliens.

Investors Business Daily (IBD) is a more honest newspaper, level headed, and actually approves of everyone abiding by the law. How refreshing!


13 posted on 11/17/2008 4:40:14 AM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko
This is a polite way of saying that these editors and reporters think their readers are too stupid to think for themselves."

Sounds like he is refering also to the most recent Presidential campaign.

We need to hold the media accountable.

14 posted on 11/17/2008 4:43:18 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko

I’ve always said that without its credibility, all a newspaper has left is absorbency.


16 posted on 11/17/2008 4:46:00 AM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko

bump


20 posted on 11/17/2008 5:09:27 AM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko; MeekOneGOP; Grampa Dave; ntnychik; potlatch; devolve; LucyT; Fred Nerks; pissant; ...

Interesting comment from Rupert Murdock, that those who purport to get our business should be giving us the business in such a patently arrogant fashion.

Imagine that, that Charlie Gibson might be displaying hubris (a state of inflation with heated gas so extreme as to distend the belly causing the classic "stuffed shirt" appearance).

That Katie Couric might somehow realize she is a female dog and see that as a bad thing--no, Mr. Murdoch, you ask too much.

The late arrogant Peter Jennings told us we had a tantrum in 1994.

The great tradition of the New York Times Soviet apologist Walter Duranty is continued by Chris Matthews' Thrilling Leg Syndrome and Keith Overbearing's Strident Tourettes in Lieu of Objectivity.

Too late, baby, no, it's too late--

Carl Camerone huckster of hateful hoaxes on top of Shep's Swinging Purse hysteria--

Who would serve in those giant shoes of Leni Reifenstahl--who would hourly impress us with the divine qualities of Hussein the Islamo-Communist messiah agent of change after the epochal pressbasms of 1917, 1922, 1933, 1949, 1959, 1979.

Never again do we rely upon Edward R. Murrow to tell us Senator Joseph McCarthy was evil and Joseph Stalin nothing but enlightened, full of glowing promise.

Never again do we eschew the bold research and reporting of those independent of the emperor's enforced blindness.

Never again submit to the Ministry of Truth which is the arm of enforcement of Global Warming or The Gulag--Your Choice, Comrade.

The Old Gray Lady is dying of AIDS.

It is morning in America.

The End.


22 posted on 11/17/2008 5:18:38 AM PST by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko; abb; Milhous; Liz; Jeff Head; PhilDragoo; bert; tubebender; martin_fierro; ...

The arrogance of the publishers/controllers, editors and the “gotyou” pseudo reporters is killing the fishwraps and the pseudo news locally/regionally and nationally.


24 posted on 11/17/2008 6:01:09 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Buy what we need before Zero is sworn in. He and Pelosi will not have our buying $'s in 2009!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko
The editor-in-chief of our paper admitted in a talk at a local university that the number one goal of the paper was to get Obama elected.
Now that the election is over they are busy continuing to smear Sarah Palin, shoving gay marriage down our throats, and writing editorials about the horde of unwashed, uneducated people in the state who gave McCain a majority.
I have begged my husband to let me cancel our subscription but he says he needs to know what lies they are printing about the company he works for. He is in a public relations type job.
25 posted on 11/17/2008 6:04:13 AM PST by k omalley (Caro Enim Mea, Vere est Cibus, et Sanguis Meus, Vere est Potus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko

Hey Rupert. Your endorsement of Obama didn’t help much either. “Rock star” indeed.


26 posted on 11/17/2008 6:06:49 AM PST by manic4organic (We Are S0 Screwed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Buckhead
To make his point, Murdoch criticized the media reaction after bloggers debunked a "60 Minutes" report by former CBS anchor, Dan Rather, that President Bush had evaded service during his days in the National Guard.

"Far from celebrating this citizen journalism, the establishment media reacted defensively. During an appearance on Fox News, a CBS executive attacked the bloggers in a statement that will go down in the annals of arrogance. '60 Minutes,' he said, was a professional organization with 'multiple layers of checks and balances.' By contrast, he dismissed the blogger as 'a guy sitting in his living room in his pajamas writing.' But eventually it was the guys sitting in their pajamas who forced Mr. Rather and his producer to resign.

ping

31 posted on 11/17/2008 7:15:09 AM PST by GOPJ (Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats: 13.2 Republicans: 2.1 -Olson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko
Murdock is right. Unlike other businesses, newspapers and MSM simply are not sensitive to the dignity of their readers. This is an old problem. The reason MSM thrived in the past is that they had no competition except others like themselves and people need information.

The people who get into Journalism typically are clueless liberal busybodies with the instincts of social workers and activist attorneys, but who don't want a regular association with the riffraff the later two must endure. Without doubt the typical editor is in favor of the fairness doctrine and internet control because it stifles competition to their benefit and they hope MSM will come back as THEY LIKE TO RUN IT.

34 posted on 11/17/2008 7:32:45 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko

BTTT


39 posted on 11/17/2008 9:11:14 AM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Fieschko; Buckhead; TankerKC

Recent Lectures

Sunday 16 November 2008

Lecture 3: The future of newspapers: moving beyond dead trees

Rupert Murdoch at heart is a traditional newspaperman. But he sees the wood for the trees. Newspapers will thrive in the 21st century if proprietors fully comprehend what it means to be alive in the era of information.  Read Transcript


53 posted on 11/17/2008 4:32:07 PM PST by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson