To: doc1019
Which is, I think, exactly why the courts will not let any of this get anywhere at all. Mobs, riots and widespread breakdown. I don’t believe they’ll do a thing, except issue some ruling that makes it appear that there was no legitimate question to start with.
To: Emmett McCarthy
425 posted on
11/15/2008 12:30:47 AM PST by
Pinkbell
(Liberals are only tolerant of those with whom they agree.)
To: Emmett McCarthy
But remember we have police swat teams and the ng to supress any trouble.
445 posted on
11/15/2008 3:18:00 AM PST by
Biggirl
(Apple Macs, The Best!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
To: Emmett McCarthy
Well how about riots and protests if the Supremes don’t rule on the matter....it is possible to make it happen the other way too!
446 posted on
11/15/2008 3:32:18 AM PST by
mdmathis6
(I'm Mike the RN!( I often do plumbing of a different sort))
To: Emmett McCarthy
That is probably right what you have stated here, the only thing that could be a little different is they may say, in the next election cycle ‘we will have identified a process to assure ALL Americans that their candidate's are Constitutionally eligible. . .’ It is my opinion that at this late date should there be an actual discrepancy proven beyond doubt with a birth certificate with proceedings to unseat the President-elect that people would take to the streets with rioting, property damage, and on and on. . . But, after that is quelled to a point our society would be forever split, we really would be a divided nation with serious on going problems.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson