Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hagan dismisses 'Godless' lawsuit
News & Observer Under the Dome ^ | Nov 13, 2008 | Ryan Teague Beckwith

Posted on 11/13/2008 6:01:55 PM PST by MitchellC

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen.-elect Kay Hagan this afternoon dismissed her lawsuit against the woman she defeated, Sen. Elizabeth Dole, over an advertisement that Hagan said attacked her personal faith.

Dole, a Republican, had launched an ad in the last week of the campaign tying Hagan to a political action group called "Godless Americans" that promotes the separation of church and state. The advertisement ended with a photo of Hagan and another woman’s voice saying, "There is no God."

Hagan, a Democrat, attended a fundraiser in August at the Boston home of a couple who is active in the group. The fundraiser also was hosted by U.S. Sen. John Kerry. Dole's campaign staff later said the advertisement was meant to highlight Hagan's judgement.

Hagan, an elder in her Presbyterian church, responded with her own ad. She accused Dole of attacking her Christian faith, and she filed a lawsuit in Wake County Superior Court.

She dismissed that suit today.

Spokeswoman Colleen Flanagan said Hagan wanted to focus on solving problems and working across party lines.

"This lawsuit would just continue the focus on a very personal and negative attack against Kay, instead of focusing on the people of North Carolina," Flanagan said in a prepared statement. "We need leadership now more than ever, and Kay is prepared to get down to work with (Republican Sen.) Richard Burr and the rest of the North Carolina delegation and help the people of this state."


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: elizabethdole; godless; kayhagan
I didn't think the ad was implying that Hagan was the one saying "There is no God" but that's because I knew it wasn't Hagan's voice. Others may have been confused by it - 'confused,' assuming it wasn't intentionally misleading.

Either way, the result was Dole was the one playing defense. Hagan's lawsuit was a big publicity stunt that got her a ton of free and sympathetic coverage in the home stretch.
1 posted on 11/13/2008 6:01:55 PM PST by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

My last name is Hagan, I hope to God I am not related to her. If she is, I don’t claim her.


2 posted on 11/13/2008 6:04:41 PM PST by RatsDawg (John McCain fought Communism in Vietnam, and now he is fighting Communist in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 100%FEDUP; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; ~Vor~; a4drvr; Adder; Aegedius; Afronaut; alethia; ...
No longer any need for that little frivolous lawsuit...

NC *Ping*

Please FRmail MitchellC if you want to be added to or removed from this North Carolina ping list.
3 posted on 11/13/2008 6:04:49 PM PST by MitchellC (RINO? GTHO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC
I saw the ad. It showed Hagan meeting with the group. Hagan's Hail Mary lawsuit did what it was supposed to do. The Dems made a big deal out of Palin’s welcoming message to the Alaska Independent Party when they were having a meeting. I guess ‘damning evidence’ for the media depends on which party you represent.
4 posted on 11/13/2008 6:07:46 PM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC
Godless Americans PAC.

Dole did more for the org - free, national publicity - than they could have achieved on their own in a decade.

5 posted on 11/13/2008 6:08:54 PM PST by CE2949BB (Fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CE2949BB

Can anyone tell me why Dole lost in a landslide?

I suspect its partly due to democratic straight ticket voting. But I live in NC and still don’t have any idea why it happened


6 posted on 11/13/2008 6:46:54 PM PST by o2bfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree

I supposed people got tired of her being a Beltway insider. We didn’t hear much about her in NC the whole 6 years she served. You have to remain in people’s minds if you want another 6 years. I also supposed that she was tired and didn’t really set her mind to campaigning.

I voted for her and am sorry that she didn’t win.


7 posted on 11/13/2008 6:58:31 PM PST by Buddygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree
Can anyone tell me why Dole lost in a landslide?

Elizabeth Dole conceived and implemented the nationwide 55 MPH speed limit, she is responsible for that stupid 3rd brake light, and most importantly, the concepts of the primary seatbelt laws and DWI fishing expedition checkpoints can be traced directly to her.

Good riddance.

Unfortunately, we will never be able to rid ourselves of these legacies.

8 posted on 11/13/2008 6:59:47 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
Elizabeth Dole conceived and implemented the nationwide 55 MPH speed limit,

The 55 MPH speed limit implemented by the 1974 National Maximum Speed Law. Dole did not become the Secretary of Transportation until 1983.

she is responsible for that stupid 3rd brake light

The third brake light is not stupid. It saves lives. People are stupid for not noticing the other two brake lights.

9 posted on 11/13/2008 7:07:54 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

IIRC, she is also credited with coining the phrase “the glass ceiling” ...


10 posted on 11/13/2008 7:14:38 PM PST by Tucson (I'd prefer you just say thank you; or pick up a piece and walk a post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

Okay, she perpetuated the 55 MPH speed limit.


11 posted on 11/13/2008 7:15:58 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
The third brake light is not stupid. It saves lives. People are stupid for not noticing the other two brake lights.

Mainly, it just presents one more burned-out lightbulb opportunity for the constabulary to stop you and jack you up.

12 posted on 11/13/2008 7:19:05 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

To be fair, she was still Secretary of Transportation when they changed the law to allow 65 MPH.


13 posted on 11/13/2008 7:23:46 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
To be fair, she was still Secretary of Transportation when they changed the law to allow 65 MPH.

ALLOW?

Most of those highways were engineered to allow 80 MPH+.

I would be pleased to know why and how the federal government came to have the authority to be concerned with speed limits anyway.

14 posted on 11/13/2008 7:27:58 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

It can’t justify it Constitutionally... then again it can’t justify most of what it does Constitutionally.


15 posted on 11/13/2008 7:29:23 PM PST by djsherin (The federal government: Because your life isn't screwed up enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
Mainly, it just presents one more burned-out lightbulb opportunity for the constabulary to stop you and jack you up.

A relative just had their light partly burn out and found out it was basically impossible to fix by yourself because part of the car had to be disassembled to reach it. But, on the plus side:

"At the end of a 10-month experiment, taxis with a third brake light had suffered 60.6% fewer rear-end collisions than had the control-group taxis. Additionally, drivers of taxis with the third brake light that were struck in the rear by other vehicles were injured 61.1% less often than were drivers of taxis without the light, and repairs to all taxis with the light cost 61.8% less than did repairs to taxis without the light." - link

16 posted on 11/13/2008 7:37:37 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
I would rather just decide I need a 3rd brake light than have the federal government dictate it to me.

The same with seatbelts.

17 posted on 11/13/2008 7:40:53 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree
Can anyone tell me why Dole lost in a landslide?

Tip O'Neil once said, "all politics is local." The Democrats live and die by that maxim. They get the local government hack jobs and organize into public worker and teacher unions. They spend working hours relentlessly pushing legislation. The working stiffs are too busy producing to be bothered with these scoundrels. More and more democracy is looking bad. The mood now is to posture oneself to steal from the public treasury. we could very well go the way of Chile.

18 posted on 11/13/2008 9:33:24 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

Yep, the tactic worked just the way Hagan wanted. She got the sympathy, won the election, and couldn’t have proven any damages in a lawsuit.


19 posted on 11/14/2008 8:01:35 AM PST by dormee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree
"Can anyone tell me why Dole lost in a landslide?"

1. The rise of liberalism in NC / Obama coat-tails.

2. She pulled an "Edwards" on us. Like "Senator Gone" she was never here, hard to reach, out of touch, too busy, etc...

jw

20 posted on 11/14/2008 11:18:44 AM PST by JWinNC (www.anailinhisplace.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson