*”I’ll be here until you dimwits admit that Hitler was never elected to anything.”
Of course you are arguing a technicallity, and what’s the point?*
A techni-freakin’-cality? You either are pregnant or you aren’t? You are either are elected or you aren’t. He wasn’t. Just admit it.
*In the last more-or-less legitimate election of 1933, they got around 43%, making Nazis the largest party in the German parliament.*
Which was still not a majority and did not control the Reichstag on their own. The majority of Germans DID NOT VOTE FOR THE NAZIS.
*Since it was Hitler’s party, it’s pretty legit to say that Hitler got 43% of the German vote — by the way, about the same as our own Billy Clintoon in 1992.*
No, it’s not “pretty legit”, because the Weimar elections didn’t work the same way ours do. The Germans actually did vote for the other guy [Hindenburg] at a higher rate. Goodness, you are dense.
*These are not disputed facts. Do you disagree?*
You are disagreeing with undisputed facts in your own post!
My guess is, you're so excited, you can't even think straight. So first, calm down. Now, just what in the world do you THINK you are arguing about?
I SAID, Hitler was first ELECTED to the German parliament, and eventually APPOINTED chancellor. Yes, I understand that parliamentary systems work different from ours. But why make a big deal of such technicalities? What's the point?
I said Hitler's Nazi party received about 43% of the vote in 1933, making them the largest party. Of course, LARGEST did not equal MAJORITY, but its ultimately why Hitler was appointed chancellor.
These FACTS are not in dispute. What are YOU trying to say?