My guess is, you're so excited, you can't even think straight. So first, calm down. Now, just what in the world do you THINK you are arguing about?
I SAID, Hitler was first ELECTED to the German parliament, and eventually APPOINTED chancellor. Yes, I understand that parliamentary systems work different from ours. But why make a big deal of such technicalities? What's the point?
I said Hitler's Nazi party received about 43% of the vote in 1933, making them the largest party. Of course, LARGEST did not equal MAJORITY, but its ultimately why Hitler was appointed chancellor.
These FACTS are not in dispute. What are YOU trying to say?
*I SAID, Hitler was first ELECTED to the German parliament, and eventually APPOINTED chancellor.*
Oh, that’s rich. And what area of Germany was Hitler representing in this Reichstag seat you have magically given him? Hmm?
Hitler never ran for election to the Reichstag. Why don’t you do a little research and tell us why? He did run for President in 1932 to Hindenburg and was trounced. Again, why don’t you do some research and tell us why Hitler suddenly did run for an elective office in 1932?
*These FACTS are not in dispute. What are YOU trying to say?*
Your facts ARE NOT FACTS. That’s what I’m trying to say. This is like arguing with an semi-illiterate over what the second letter of the alphabet is.