Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: solfour; LucyT; pissant; Kevmo; Fred Nerks; Calpernia; PhilDragoo; et al
Judge Souter dismissed Berg's suit solely because he lacked "standing" with respect to the damages that he implied he suffered.

What if all of the FReepers gathered signatures from as many people as possible who are willing to be part of a class-action lawsuit, filed in courts across the nation, claiming that their Civil Rights have been violated, based on the established fact that the US Constitution is a legally-binding contract between the Government of the United States and its Citizens, and that allowing a Constitutionally-ineligible person to serve as President is a Breach said of Contract, that has jeopardized the Constitution itself as the Law of the Land, and of our Civil Rights as guaranteed by Law.

We can show, quite clearly, the damages have already resulted from giving Executive Powers to a person who has no legal right to invoke them, and who has no legal authority to control the Executive Branch of Government; that such a person intends to use these Executive powers to the detriment of the Country, the Constitution, and the People.

It can be proven, in a court of law, that the Citizens of the United States have suffered damages as a direct result of these illegal actions, through the loss of their income, jobs, Happiness, and the Right to speak freely, without fear of retribution, as guaranteed by the First Amendment.

Individually, one person may not have "standing," but collectively, as We the People must have "standing" or the term ceases to have any meaning, if We the People are prevented from demanding that Justice be done in seeking injunctive relief, given that the Law of the Land speaks directly to our collective rights to Petition our Government for redress.

181 posted on 11/14/2008 8:51:25 AM PST by Polarik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Polarik; Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; Jeff Head; ..

Thanks, Polarik.

Ping.


182 posted on 11/14/2008 8:58:31 AM PST by LucyT (................. Don't go wobbly now.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

To: Polarik

Judge Souter dismissed Berg’s suit? When did that happen? Souter denied the injunction; but I thought Obama had to still respond by 12/1. Did that change?


183 posted on 11/14/2008 8:59:11 AM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

To: Polarik

Wow, nice writing. Are you Abe Lincoln reincarnated?


184 posted on 11/14/2008 9:07:07 AM PST by Kevmo (Palin/Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

To: Polarik

There has to be a lawyer SOMEWHERE in the country willing to initiate such a class action suit.


188 posted on 11/14/2008 10:08:12 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson