Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: Ol' Sparky
2 posted on
11/11/2008 6:23:26 PM PST by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: Ol' Sparky
Well, this will certainly spark a revolt. The will of the people overturned by a couple of guys in black dresses. I think it’s time to remove these people by force
To: Ol' Sparky
NOW THAT will be a sight and spectacle to behold!
4 posted on
11/11/2008 6:25:58 PM PST by
Outlaw Woman
(Those with the most to Lose, did the least to prevent it's happening. Ronald Reagan 10/27/64)
To: Ol' Sparky
I'm waiting for the homos to protest in black neighborhoods and churches. Now that would be entertainment!
7 posted on
11/11/2008 6:27:19 PM PST by
randog
(What the...?!)
To: Ol' Sparky
I was telling friend of mine if Cali supreme court does that
Okay I am aiming for recall of all those bozos we can in this state
8 posted on
11/11/2008 6:30:12 PM PST by
SevenofNine
("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
To: Ol' Sparky; JustAmy; mtngrl@vrwc; gracie1; Mama_Bear; jkphoto; notpoliticallycorewrecked; ...
9 posted on
11/11/2008 6:30:25 PM PST by
Jim Robinson
(We ARE the dissent, baby!)
To: Ol' Sparky
"Costa says he's already been contacted by some of the folks who would seek to recall Ronald George, Joyce Kennard, Kathryn Werdegar and Carlos Moreno if Prop. 8 is scrapped. He thinks it's premature and risky because talk of a recall "would just (bleep) off the judges.""
???????????????????????????????????????????
10 posted on
11/11/2008 6:30:35 PM PST by
Psycho_Bunny
(By Obama's own reckoning, isn't Lyndon LaRouche more qualified? He's run since the 70's)
To: Ol' Sparky
So then they declare the recall unconstitutional, null and void.
Then what?
11 posted on
11/11/2008 6:30:40 PM PST by
Chet 99
To: Ol' Sparky
On what basis can they throw 8 out?
It already went to court before the election and the anti-8 people were denied and the vote went ahead.
It can’t be called state unconstitutional again because 8 is an amendment to the constitution. The only thing left is claiming its unconstitutional under the federal constitution. If they do that then it goes immediately to the SCOTUS. If the SCOTUS finds that banning gay marriage is unconstitutional then all state bans across the country are thrown out.
This is going to be interesting.
To: Ol' Sparky
“Judicial fascism” has got to go.
14 posted on
11/11/2008 6:33:46 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(I voted for McCain/Palin so I can look my grandchildren in the eyes when I tell them I'm sorry.)
To: Ol' Sparky
They won't overturn Proposition 8 because they remember what happened to Rose Bird. If the Justices are perceived as putting ideology ahead of the law, they could be out of office in no time.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
17 posted on
11/11/2008 6:37:13 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Ol' Sparky
The California Supreme Court's surprising announcement that it will quickly review the legality of Proposition 8, banning gay marriage, has prompted growing speculation that the four judges who found a right to gay marriage in the state Constitution in a May ruling will quickly throw Prop. 8 out.The ballet initiative already has been reviewed by the courts has it not? The proposed amendment to the Constitution was approved by the people. On what basis can they trash the legality of Proposition 8? Has it not already been vetted? The eager legal beavers already threw out Prop 22; telling the people that they had to get an amendment to the Constitution. The people have the amendment; now they are going to throw that out too?
What kind of doubletalk are the judges giving now? Is this a "Mother, May I" kind of thing, so the people of California have to go back to the end of the line, and start over for the third time?
20 posted on
11/11/2008 6:38:59 PM PST by
olezip
To: Ol' Sparky
The Libs are really aggravating many Blacks (even Lib Blacks) by trying to claim the civil rights struggle of gays is the same as the civil rights struggle of Blacks.
To: Ol' Sparky
As much as they would like to toss Prop. 8, they won’t because they will not risk losing their gig on the State Supreme Court and all the benefits that go with it, including the power, salary, and increased retirement.
To: Ol' Sparky
Nahhh! That’s KALIPORNIA. A real blue state. Look at their governor - the Gubernator.
24 posted on
11/11/2008 6:40:24 PM PST by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
To: Ol' Sparky
Just do like Mass. did ... ban voter initiatives ...
27 posted on
11/11/2008 6:42:49 PM PST by
SkyDancer
("I Believe In The Law Until It Interferes With Justice")
To: Ol' Sparky
[Costa] thinks it's premature and risky because talk of a recall "would just (bleep) off the judges."Don't look at a recall effort pessimistically. It could scare them enough that they decide fighting for gay marriage isn't worth losing their jobs.
31 posted on
11/11/2008 6:45:16 PM PST by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: Ol' Sparky
Out of curiousity - I heard that Mormons (LDS) were very big at pushing Prop 8. I met a few of them before and they were very nice people.
Pisses me off how some Christians got on Mitt for being a Mormon. It was also the bigoted Dems too.
I will not “gird my lions” for the “Mitt-haters” responses.
34 posted on
11/11/2008 6:48:14 PM PST by
Frantzie
To: Ol' Sparky
If we have a recall, Arnie should be added to the list of 4 judges!
37 posted on
11/11/2008 6:50:50 PM PST by
dalereed
To: Ol' Sparky
I just wish California would divide into 3 or more separate states. They have too much power.
39 posted on
11/11/2008 6:50:52 PM PST by
FreeAtlanta
(Join the Constitution Party)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson