Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin - America's Sweetheart Thread...

Posted on 11/07/2008 4:00:55 AM PST by DocT111

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: Non-Sequitur

You are exactly the kind of back-stabber Rush was talking about. You need to be named so you can’t work again. Guess what? The other party won’t trust you either.


81 posted on 11/07/2008 7:24:41 AM PST by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
“John McCain’s campaign staff has now spent more time attacking Sarah Palin than they spent combined on Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Rashid Khalidi, Frank Marshall Davis, and Obama himself. This party must be suicidal.”

**********************

Wow. That sums it up, doesn't it?

Trying to be all things for everyone is impossible, and a failing strategy.

82 posted on 11/07/2008 7:30:04 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Great photos!


83 posted on 11/07/2008 7:30:37 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
who stands to benefit most from the relentless parroting of such idiocies; and, more importantly, why?

Of course. She drew crowds. She energized the right. Therefore she has to be marginalized and destroyed. Anyone doubting the press and the left (but I repeat myself) isn't playing for keeps is wrong.

Also, in the sentence "(Palin) waltzed into hotel rooms full of men wearing nothing but a towel ... " I believe I let the participle dangle. :)

84 posted on 11/07/2008 7:31:20 AM PST by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: spodefly
She drew crowds. She energized the right. Therefore she has to be marginalized and destroyed.

Bingo. And it's the RNC leftists and Noonan-esque fellow travelers within our own ranks who are proving to be even more treacherous and destructive than their ideological brethren from across the aisle.

I believe I let the participle dangle. :)

Wear a long coat. Nobody will notice. ;)

85 posted on 11/07/2008 7:36:15 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (G-d watch over and protect Sarah Palin and her family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: The Toll
"I’m not even sure why people keep blasting any stated opposition to her as coming from Rinos."

She is the last conservative that will ever work for a RINO. You can tell by the way she left the stage when McCain gave his concession speech. That speech defines a RINO. A government RINO. All the people that worked for McCain must be named.

86 posted on 11/07/2008 7:41:34 AM PST by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: trisham

McCain is and always has been a pathetic, mean, self-centered jerk.

He is a 72 year old spoiled brat and an ego that doesn’t stop.

This is what got him into the Hanoi Hilton.


87 posted on 11/07/2008 7:51:27 AM PST by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: BobS

Sure, you’ll get no disagreement from me on that. McCain and the people that have been pushing him for years, had it their way this time around and the results were predictable.

My point is more about the strengths of Palin going forward. There are some things that are set in stone. Her commitment to pro-life and the 2nd ammendment are very clear. I never had any doubts about those issues were GW was concerned either, but his compassionate conservatism was ruinous.

My point is that my reservations concerning Palin do not come from the left but from the right. I do not want to fall into a cult of personality type of support for her. I simply was not impressed with her peformance during the campain.


88 posted on 11/07/2008 7:52:50 AM PST by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

He won’t have another shot at it, thank God.


89 posted on 11/07/2008 7:55:46 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: MDspinboyredux

Can’t confirm this, but it was reported at another site that the interviewer mentioned South Africa and she asked “Do you mean the country of South Africa, or the southern part of the continent?” — and the spin was in (so to speak).


90 posted on 11/07/2008 7:55:57 AM PST by Tenniel2 ("Obama's the guy in the office who has never done anything but move on to the next job" -- Anon., TH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Yes. Thank God.


91 posted on 11/07/2008 8:07:41 AM PST by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

What program was used to create that? What fonts and colors were used?


92 posted on 11/07/2008 8:11:09 AM PST by TheFourthMagi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheFourthMagi

I’m afraid I honestly couldn’t say. Possibly the folks over at the zazzle.com site, where I found the photo, could help you...?


93 posted on 11/07/2008 8:13:25 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (G-d watch over and protect Sarah Palin and her family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: DocT111
"I'll be keeping an eye on you Marxists..."


94 posted on 11/07/2008 8:36:05 AM PST by TXnMA (To anger a conservative, lie about him. To anger a liberal -- tell the truth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
The only thing about you that makes sense on this thread is your FRName...

Depart.

95 posted on 11/07/2008 8:41:54 AM PST by TXnMA (To anger a conservative, lie about him. To anger a liberal -- tell the truth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
Exactly. The fault lies with McCain. Period.

McCain, at the top of the ticket, no matter who he had as VP, was NEVER going to win IMO.

By nominating McCain we lost our best argument that Washington was broken and we needed outsiders to go in and fix it.

Also, the dems were able to tie McCain to Bush very successfully by harping on their connection and repeating the ad about McCain supporting Bush 90% of the time over and over again.

The people wanted change and McCain represented the past.

While, I am not sure they could have defeated the Cult of Obama either, a Romney/Palin ticket would have been much more successful in arguing that THEY could bring REAL change as the only true Washington outsiders and the only two with actual executive experience.

The indies would have trusted the experienced and steady hand of Romney to guide us in this financial crisis and the base would have been energized by Palin. Who knows what could have been.....

Case in point: Romney talking here about what needs to be done -- his experience and demonstrated grasp of the issues would have been reassuring to many (even across party lines): http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/05/news/newsmakers/romney.fortune/

96 posted on 11/07/2008 8:54:33 AM PST by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: redgirlinabluestate

Oh, and I wanted to add because McCain was at the top of the ticket, it precluded Sarah from highlighting her own fabulous credentials as a Washington outsider and an exectuive with real experience. Her credentials made McCain look bad and she was hampered as to how much she could say.


97 posted on 11/07/2008 8:56:35 AM PST by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
Depart.

No.

98 posted on 11/07/2008 9:04:55 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Mea culpa: I presumed that you had created it.


99 posted on 11/07/2008 9:05:33 AM PST by TheFourthMagi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: BobS
You are exactly the kind of back-stabber Rush was talking about. You need to be named so you can’t work again. Guess what? The other party won’t trust you either.

There is nothing about the other party that attracts me. I'd rather stay and try to save this one from fools and idiots. It'd be nice to win some elections again. We haven't been doing too well the last couple years.

100 posted on 11/07/2008 9:06:24 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson