Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blamin’ Palin? What Are They Thinking?
FoxNews.com ^ | November 6th, 2008 | Andrea Tantaros

Posted on 11/06/2008 12:04:00 PM PST by Joiseydude

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Joiseydude
FOX News’ Carl Cameron ticked off a litany of these accusations

Saw that and really seemed to enjoy it, too. He more suited to TMZ.

21 posted on 11/06/2008 12:23:20 PM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude
Operation Freep Palin
22 posted on 11/06/2008 12:23:42 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lnzog

Yeah the stories changes depending on who reported it Fox or Newsweek.

I don’t think that particular story has all that damaging an effect. To many guys get distracted with the visual.


23 posted on 11/06/2008 12:24:41 PM PST by redk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude
THEY BETTER LEAVE GOVERNOR PALIN ALONE !
24 posted on 11/06/2008 12:24:41 PM PST by timestax ( CNNLIES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude
McCain:
Just recall his presidential run against G.W.
Mac already returned to his original and natural style of back and forth, here and there, against:
Maverick.
25 posted on 11/06/2008 12:25:03 PM PST by hermgem (Will Olmr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chippewaman
I know that I gave several hundred dollars AFTER Sarah came on board, not to mention a few more hundred going to the 527's. ( probably all totalled close to $1500 which is a lot of money to me.....

Sarah Palin is the only one that motivated me.....

these despicable people can just go fly a kite....

if Palin ever decides to endure this type of constant onslaught from the media, and some of her staff, SHE will be in charge and SHE will pick who her staff is....

Hang in there Sarah Palin.....

26 posted on 11/06/2008 12:25:15 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

I do NOT understand all the HELL that is being raised about her wardrobe! Who the hell pays for Obama’s suits, his airplane, etc.?
Sure as heck didn’t come out of his own pocket.
Which “campaign related” expenses must be paid for by the candidate?


27 posted on 11/06/2008 12:25:52 PM PST by a real Sheila (REGROUP! ENERGIZE! Let's take this country BACK!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
"But Sarah didn't cement the base and didn't attract the PUMA vote. She had high negatives. And if she did any of the stuff Cameron noted, then what's the beef if it's exposed."

Y'know, you coulda fooled me. I thought she did a great job of energizing the base. That she didn't manage to get all of them back, when McCain's foolishness lost them is hardly her fault. And the only "high negatives" I noticed were from the MSM and a few of their "inside-the-beltway" accomplices, running a 24/7 verbal assassination party.

28 posted on 11/06/2008 12:26:57 PM PST by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: chippewaman
I agree 100% chippewaman.
The ONLY reason I voted in the general election was because of Sarah.
After the Primary the RNC called here to get a donation. I told them I'll start donating again when they get Conservatives back on the ticket. NO MORE RINO'S. The woman said “you don't want a Democrat in the WH do you?” I told her I'd take my chances.

We may have to go through HELL the next 4 years but hopefully the conservative politicians will now wake up.

The numbers are coming in and conservatives stayed home and PUMA'S went with Obama.

It's time we take back our party

29 posted on 11/06/2008 12:31:00 PM PST by Country Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude
Two-time loser Juan McCain was a terrible candidate who ran a terrible campaign.

He's spent more energy defending Obama than he has defending Sarah Palin.

He is part of the reason I left the Republcan Party. Bush is the other.

30 posted on 11/06/2008 12:32:47 PM PST by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
because of the entire war against her and her family....is it her baby/ is it not her baby....give dna....lousy mother with pregant teenager, son a vandal and a drug user, own husband had a dwi 20 yrs ago, oy my....tasergate,clothes gate...travel gate...going rogue threated with gang rape...called names and c*unt printed on shirts about her....her private email attacked...

attack attack attack....

McCain is lame if he allows this ridiculous and meaningless diatribe arout OUR candidate.....

31 posted on 11/06/2008 12:33:25 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

I don’t have a problem with them airing Palin’s shortcomings and misbehavior. However, in the same breath, they ought to be airing the names of those really responsible for putting this woefully unqualified and unvetted person on the ticket. Sarah Palin did not place herself on the ticket, and those who are responsible for placing her there need to be held to account for THEIR incredibly poor judgement. Fawning FReepers notwithstanding, Palin will be nowhere near the Republican ticket in 2012, but the campaign advisers who put her on the 2008 ticket should be banished to the fringes as well, or we can pretty much count on 8 years of President Obama.


32 posted on 11/06/2008 12:35:16 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
We've got to get out the tribal mentality of protecting our own at all costs.

I'd consider siding with those scumbag staffers who badmouth her now as "tribal mentality". The conservative base loves Palin. The only one who have beef with her are the RINOs, the media, the liberals and the sheeple mouthbreathers who bought marxism hook line and sinker. Get real. Without Palin, McCain would had to content with having Lieberman for audience.

33 posted on 11/06/2008 12:35:25 PM PST by SolidWood (Sarah Palin - Everything that is Sweetness and Light! WE STAND WITH HER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

Thrown under the bus? She laid in front of it. And then challenged the driver to run over her. Like an idiot he did, but she brought it on.


34 posted on 11/06/2008 12:36:25 PM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lnzog
This whole thing is worse than high school.

You're surprised? This is what happens when you let the butt-brigades run your campaign.

It would be nice if once, just once, Republican candidates could find campaign managers who were ACTUAL CONSERVATIVES!
35 posted on 11/06/2008 12:36:30 PM PST by Antoninus (Beware of so-called Republicans who trash Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Exactly!! Before Palin, we were not giving to the McCain campaign. As soon as Palin became his running mate, I told my husband to get out the checkbook and send money. He said he already had it out.

I might have voted for him, but not with the enthusiasm that I did with Palin on the ticket. And there were Hillary voters that wouldn’t have voted for him without Palin on the ticket. All these other people that are negative about her wouldn’t have voted for McCain anyway.


36 posted on 11/06/2008 12:37:17 PM PST by AUsome Joy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

McCain and his geniuses have to explain to themselves how they managed to lose to a guy with no experience, no resume, no past. How do you lose to a ghost?

A guy with Joe Biden as his running-mate, no less, while you’ve got a wildly popular partner out stumping for you.

How do you manage to screw that up?


37 posted on 11/06/2008 12:37:34 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

The “he’s a war hero” thing isn’t flying anymore. McCain was an awful candidate with an awful campaign. Your neocon experiment utterly failed. You McCain trolls need to leave and find somewhere else to spew your garbage so FR can get back to work on SERIOUS candidates.


38 posted on 11/06/2008 12:38:31 PM PST by Bull Market (The Neo-Con experiment failed. John McCain deserved to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
but she brought it on.

How? Show us your true feelings!

39 posted on 11/06/2008 12:38:52 PM PST by SolidWood (Sarah Palin - Everything that is Sweetness and Light! WE STAND WITH HER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Suprised... yes. I’m young, this was the first election I voted in. So I was suprised and extremely disapointed in my ‘leaders’.


40 posted on 11/06/2008 12:39:47 PM PST by lnzog (I can't wait to blame the president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson